cherifGsoul on update-infrastructure-page
Fix typos (compare)
cherifGsoul on document-inserted-removed-can6
Add inserted/removed events to … (compare)
greenkeeper[bot] on can-view-live-5.0.1
fix(package): update can-view-l… (compare)
greenkeeper[bot] on core-js-3.4.8
chore(package): update core-js … (compare)
cherifGsoul on update-infrastructure-page
Update infrastructure page with… (compare)
greenkeeper[bot] on @feathersjs
chore(package): update @feather… (compare)
greenkeeper[bot] on @feathersjs
chore(package): update @feather… (compare)
can-observation.js:255 Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'valueDependencies' of undefined
at Function.Observation.updateChildrenAndSelf (can-observation.js:255)
at eval (can-observation.js:257)
at Set.forEach (<anonymous>)
at Function.Observation.updateChildrenAndSelf (can-observation.js:256)
at Observation.get (can-observation.js:156)
at Object.getValue (get-set.js:147)
at Text.branchRenderer (mustache_core.js:329)
at Text.HTMLSection.targetCallback (html_section.js:151)
at hydrateCallbacks (can-view-target.js:254)
at Object.hydrate (can-view-target.js:276)
hey, I am using can-fixture and I was wondering how to avoid getting stringified responses. for example:
let statuses = {
success: 1,
statuses: "anything really, just testing!"
}
fixture({method: "get", url: "/json/internet/blah/blah/blah"}, function() {
return statuses
});
returns statuses as a string
Can someone explain visible difference between can observables and stream functionality ? LIke Kefir streams / toStream etc. What is possible with streams that isn't possible with observables ?
For example here: https://canjs.com/doc/guides/technical.html in section where redux-like approach described. There is point:Having a single, ApplicationViewModel that contains all state, derived using can-define-stream from events dispatched on the ApplicationViewModel.
I cant understand why we need can-define-stream here ? Any observable will have change
event as well.
value
stream added. But you could have same functionality in set
before, isn't it ?
set
and with value
it may be different, but still