@justinbmeyer
Hi, i created an issue: canjs/can-fixture#160.
I also briefly thought about fixing it myself but i'm not sure why it needs to be _log since there is no use of underscore prefixes in de rest of the code.
Hi, i created an issue: canjs/can-fixture#160.
I also briefly thought about fixing it myself but i'm not sure why it needs to be _log since there is no use of underscore prefixes in de rest of the code.
@/all We’re going to have a live stream right now about the next survey’s proposals:
https://forums.donejs.com/t/donejs-community-survey-november-2018/998
Live stream:
@nmingneau there isn't in
can-fixture, but there is in a lot of other canjs code
I'll write up a little more so you can do it if you'd like.
Our latest community survey is out! 📝 Check your email inbox for a link or learn more and take the survey from here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/donejs-survey-10
Since can@5.16.3 I get this warning inside my console when running my jest tests. But I’m not aware of any registered “not” helpers inside my code. Anyone an idea why this warning is triggerd?
Hi guys, what "crossed" items means in this issue:
https://github.com/canjs/canjs/issues/4115#issuecomment-434448401
@Lighttree We’re getting closer to having a stable version of
can released with IE11 support. You might want to watch this PR too. 😊 canjs/canjs#4600
'{viewModel} definemappram' function() { ... does not seem to fire
You want to listen to when any
property changes?
btw, if you are in
4.X, I'd suggest using connectedCallback() instead of the events object
You should be able to use
canReflect.onPatches(): https://canjs.com/doc/can-reflect/observe.onPatches.html
IE11 is now included in the CanJS test suite. 🎉 Props to Kevin, Cherif, and others who contributed to this! 🏁 https://github.com/canjs/canjs/releases/tag/v5.17.0
cc @Lighttree 😃
@/all Today’s the last day to vote in our community survey, please fill it out here if you haven’t already: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/donejs-survey-10
Hello everyone! Does somebody have an experience with migration CanJs 2 to CanJs 3? Are there some bottlenecks with this process not described into https://canjs.com/doc/migrate-3.html? Thank you for any help!
Besides is there any reason for this proposal: canjs/canjs#3864 disappear from survey ?
Why do you want to disable them?
I'm still having lots of log messages on console and I think that testee collects them.
So it seems like if you disable them you hide potential issues.
Meanwhile I was trying to have a build in ou CI server
It seems that the log messages are being sent to testee.
At least is what I can understand from the following call stack:
At least is what I can understand from the following call stack:
it runs a server with a little api for example mocha or anything else it is flexible
testee.min.js is the client part it gets the mocha tests for example executes them and returns them via the api to the server
so testee.min.js is only a executor that sends the result to the server via the api that it offers
and then returns the result from that api call
thats how it works hope that this info helps you a bit better to understand the concepts behind it
Can-bind, can-queues and can-observation-recorder are all being collected by testee client and being sent to testee server. This warning/info messages are not relevant to testee report, so I was trying to disable them because it seems that the tests are hanging because testee client is sending all the log messages to testee server.