Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • 03:51
    opusforlife2 commented #595
  • 00:22
    BananaAcid commented #595
  • 00:21
    BananaAcid commented #595
  • 00:19
    BananaAcid commented #595
  • 00:19
    BananaAcid commented #595
  • Dec 10 17:01
    gep13 commented #595
  • Dec 10 13:31
    gep13 commented #595
  • Dec 10 10:15
    BananaAcid commented #595
  • Dec 10 10:12
    BananaAcid commented #595
  • Dec 10 10:11
    BananaAcid commented #595
  • Dec 10 10:11
    BananaAcid commented #595
  • Dec 10 10:10
    BananaAcid commented #595
  • Dec 09 15:53
    Computerlabrat commented #318
  • Dec 08 02:06
    rwperrott commented #595
  • Dec 04 18:14
    mtnielsen commented #718
  • Dec 04 18:13
    mtnielsen closed #718
  • Dec 04 18:13
    mtnielsen commented #718
  • Dec 04 16:42
    gep13 commented #718
  • Dec 04 14:54
    mtnielsen commented #718
  • Dec 04 14:53
    mtnielsen commented #718
Gary Ewan Park
@gep13
no, haven't considered doing that yet. That is not to say that we won't, but for now, the focus is on Windows, and using WPF.
@linuxUsr118 sorry, not sure I follow your question. Can you elaborate?
Joshua
@linuxUsr118
When doing an install, can I tell (or type in) where I want chocolatey to install a programme?
Gary Ewan Park
@gep13
ah, so you are asking for that to be exposed within ChocolateyGUI, right?
Joshua
@linuxUsr118
Yes, I think.
I have a weird feeling that all my answers have been staring me right in the face.
Gary Ewan Park
@gep13
I believe we have an open issue for what you are asking for, but if we don't then this should definitely be added
could I ask that you check, and if not there, add an issue? Thanks!
Joshua
@linuxUsr118
Thank you.
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
@Geogboe I'm a big fan of Electron, but at least right now Chocolatey is Windows only, and so WPF just makes more sense. Easy development and delpoyment, and easy interop with Choco's C# API.
Ironically moving to Electron wouldn't make Choco that much heaver as we're already shipping CEF for markdown (and some other item) support.
Manfred Wallner
@mwallner
hey @RichiCoder1 @ferventcoder how's the status on chocolatey/ChocolateyGUI#436 ? - I think this would be great to have in 0.15 .. :-)
Rob Reynolds
@ferventcoder
I think it is necessary :D
George.IO
@Geogboe
@RichiCoder1 Thanks for the insight!
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
@ferventcoder Are you going to integrate those changes, or should I tackle that?
Rob Reynolds
@ferventcoder
I will provide a fix in the next few days - if you can get to it sooner, :D
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
Baring any surprises, it should be be trivial to swap :). I'll see if I can knock it out later today.
Manfred Wallner
@mwallner
:sparkles:
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
@ferventcoder Those changes were in 0.16+ right?
Manfred Wallner
@mwallner
0.10.6+ I guess @RichiCoder1
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
Derp. Yes.
Rob Reynolds
@ferventcoder
@RichiCoder1++
The chocolatiest bot this side of the Mississippi
@choco-bot
richicoder1 gained a level! (Karma: 9)
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
Gotta love green builds :)
(not that our builds do that much currently admittedly)
Manfred Wallner
@mwallner
I've discovered some really stupid inconsistencies in the german translation of the current develop-branch .. will fix tonight/tomorrow!
(I am allowed to call them "stupid" as I'm the author of them :D)
@RichiCoder1 - please wait for the upcoming PR before considering the 0.15 release
In addition to that, the ChocolateyGUI solution cannot be built when a global nuget library path is specified - copying the correc packages to source/packages fixed the problem temporarily - but I guess there are some relative include directives/paths somewhere pointing to ../packages/...
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
@mwallner Yup yup. I think StyleCop, CEF, and another package depend on relative paths and targets.
Manfred Wallner
@mwallner
hey @RichiCoder1 - the current /develop GUI fails to pull the current version of packages:
image.png
can you reproduce this / is this actually a bug?
Manfred Wallner
@mwallner
  • not the current, but the latest available ...
Manfred Wallner
@mwallner
the "latestVersion" got from chocolateyService is null ...
image.png
Manfred Wallner
@mwallner
(couldn't debug into the service contract - maybe @RichiCoder1 or @gep13 could take a look? :-))
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
@mwallner If you set VS's Startup to start both Subprocess & GUI (In that order), you can debug into subprocess where all the logic is hapenning
That being said, it must have just broke. Was working literally yesterday
Manfred Wallner
@mwallner
do you think you can fix it soon (like, today :D) - I'd have the chance to 'hand out' a beta to a couple of collegues tomorrow to play with/ QA the thing before we do a 0.15 release ;-)
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
Workin fine here :|
Manfred Wallner
@mwallner
hm ..
oh: I think I broke the AppVeyor build - but it seems to be Nuget/Cake related ...
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
xD
Manfred Wallner
@mwallner
image.png
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
Hmm. Looks like we're hitting out MyGet quota or something. @gep13 ?
Kim J. Nordmo
@AdmiringWorm
@RichiCoder1 probably used up the 500MB quota, I suggest perhaps deleting older versions on myget (Possibly enable Package Retention cleanup)
Richard Simpson
@RichiCoder1
I think that's what I'll do. I can't configure cleanup as I'm only a contributer, not an admin