These are chat archives for christopherread/Obvs

26th
Apr 2016
Christopher Read
@christopherread
Apr 26 2016 07:26
@anthonyhawes great! By all means carry on using NetMQ transport, it should be pretty solid. Guess it depends whether your intended architecture is better suited to a brokerless transport like NetMQ or something with a broker like ActiveMQ. I've also been experimenting with an EventStore transport, where you get the added benefits of storage and projections built in.
@anthonyhawes the nice thing about Obvs is switching transport is easy, and you can pick and choose a different one for each endpoint if it suits.