These are chat archives for coala/coala-bears

22nd
Feb 2017
John Vandenberg
@jayvdb
Feb 22 2017 06:18
@robinsjdotcom , very cool.
Travis has erlang support
You can rebase onto my PR coala/coala-bears#1386 , and add erlang
Abinash Senapati
@Techievena
Feb 22 2017 10:12
@Makman2 got changes merged in upstream codebase of apertium-lint https://sourceforge.net/p/apertium/svn/HEAD/tree/trunk/apertium-tools/apertium-lint/ Next I have asked them to release a new version for us. :smile:
Mischa Krüger
@Makman2
Feb 22 2017 10:31
cool @Techievena :D
John Vandenberg
@jayvdb
Feb 22 2017 12:43
Nice
Abinash Senapati
@Techievena
Feb 22 2017 14:32
:smiley:
arnab1896
@arnab1896
Feb 22 2017 16:09
is it okay if i only build my branch in appveyor?
or is it incorrect to proceed that way?
cheers :tada:
John Vandenberg
@jayvdb
Feb 22 2017 17:27
If it is a windows only change, then windows only ci is ok
If it is a coala repo change, appveyor has 100% coverage of the code, so it should be sufficient
But for coala-bears repo, appveyor tests are not very good
arnab1896
@arnab1896
Feb 22 2017 17:47
@jayvdb what I meant to ask was this---> is it okay to test only my branch, and not the master branch or other devs' branches
Lasse Schuirmann
@sils
Feb 22 2017 17:48
I don't see why not
arnab1896
@arnab1896
Feb 22 2017 18:13
@sils , :+1: