is there an alternative for the content type API issue?
it would be good to have the "type" available… for the social stream we don't really need it. but it would be good to know (e.g. other markup or class if the post is a video, etc…
dejanlaco
@dejanlaco
Maybe status_type?
From docs:
The type of a status update. Values include: added_photos added_video app_created_story approved_friend created_event created_group created_note mobile_status_update published_story shared_story tagged_in_photo wall_post
@piccaso should we accept the merge request now or should dejan adopt everything in the branch first?
maybe everything related to the webhooks with also the open todos in the issue description should first went in the pull request. and this would be the base for the api update in the end?
dejanlaco
@dejanlaco
@Grienauer the last one proposal sounds good for me. I'm already working on the attachments & webhooks, so I'll push these changes after they're completed to the existing 'webhooks fix' branch...