composer/composer

Dependency Manager for PHP https://getcomposer.org/

Manjunath Reddy

@manjufy

No luck :-). its stuck

hmmm after 5mins

Using version ^6.3 for guzzlehttp/guzzle
./composer.json has been updated
Loading composer repositories with package information
Updating dependencies (including require-dev)

Manjunath Reddy

@manjufy

Here is the actual error message

`Using version ^6.3 for guzzlehttp/guzzle
./composer.json has been updated
Loading composer repositories with package information
Updating dependencies (including require-dev)

Your requirements could not be resolved to an installable set of packages.

Problem 1

- symfony/event-dispatcher v4.0.2 requires php ^7.1.3 -> your PHP version (7.0.13) does not satisfy that requirement.
- symfony/event-dispatcher v4.0.2 requires php ^7.1.3 -> your PHP version (7.0.13) does not satisfy that requirement.
- symfony/event-dispatcher v4.0.2 requires php ^7.1.3 -> your PHP version (7.0.13) does not satisfy that requirement.
- Installation request for symfony/event-dispatcher (locked at v4.0.2) -> satisfiable by symfony/event-dispatcher[v4.0.2].

Installation failed, reverting ./composer.json to its original content.
`

Ben Johnson

@cbj4074

@manju16832003 I have no idea why it takes so much time, but that is a separate issue.

The error you're receiving now is pretty cut-and-dry. You need PHP 7.1.3 or later to use the packages you're requesting.

Manjunath Reddy

@manjufy

Interesting.

Ben Johnson

@cbj4074

It likely has something to do with pcntl, which is available only in 7.1.

So, you either need to use older versions of everything, or upgrade PHP.

Manjunath Reddy

@manjufy

is there a command to upgrade php to latest..

Ben Johnson

@cbj4074

Yeah, it looks like you are using Ondrej Sury's PPA for Ubuntu. Smart guy!

Is this in a VM? Is it testing only? Do you care about anything breaking?

Manjunath Reddy

@manjufy

oh Yes...

Homestead vagrant from Laravel

Ben Johnson

@cbj4074

Okay, perfect. Then the easiest thing to do is simply to upgrade Homestead.

Your version appears to be quite stale.

Manjunath Reddy

@manjufy

Yes, I guess so. ... my vagrant box is quite old... Probably 1.3 years lol

Ben Johnson

@cbj4074

That's a different subject, though, and may be best asked over in laravel/laravel.

(I can help you there)

Kongthap Thammachat

@jeud

hi i would like to install private repo from github instead of packagist, i have setup my composer.json as below

{
  "repositories": [
    {
      "type": "package",
      "package": {
        "name": "laravel-repo",
        "version": "1.1",
        "source": {
          "url": "https://github.com/jeud/laravel-repo.git",
          "type": "git",
          "reference": "master"
        }
      }
    }
  ],
  "require": {
    "laravel-repo": "1.1"
  }
}

it's working but i'm not sure what different between defining type: packageinside repositories and type: git without type: package ?

shilili

@shilili

Hi all! Anyone interested in participating in a php authentication research project? It's remote and we're paying developers $100/hr to participate. The goal is to get insights on how to improve the developer onboarding experience for a SaaS. Message me if interested!

ahsan waseem

@ahsanwaseem

hi everyone

need a little help

regarding php

Diego Gullo

@bizmate

@jeud it is all pretty much explained here. https://getcomposer.org/doc/02-libraries.md#publishing-to-a-vcs

@jeud type package is if you want to import the project without relying on a composer.json existing on the package source. In general it is best to have a composer.json on that repository if you control it and then just use vcs as a type

Can anyone help with this conflict issue? composer/composer#7089 I have no understanding of what it means. Ie why is it complaining about a root package or something?

Diego Gullo

@bizmate

@manju16832003 remove the double require

Robert Main

@robertmain

Hey guys

Anyone know off-hand how to have Composer load a single file?

i.e: require the PHP file and instantiate the class contained therein?

Owen Melbourne

@OwenMelbz

it can load a single file yes, but it wont execute any code

Joaquin Varela

@jjvvx

Hi. I have a project that I want to upload outside of Packagist. I've just one question: where does Composer get the vendor and package name when not using public Packagist? Does it use the explicit definition in composer.json or does something external influence that?

Owen Melbourne

@OwenMelbz

that completly depends, you get different repo types, zip, packages, composer, vcs

so if you setup a composer repo - like satis, then it uses the composer.json

if you using a git repo - then you define a custom name in the projects composer.json rather than the 3rd party package

Joaquin Varela

@jjvvx

ah I see

Karl Viiburg

@kurbar

Hi. I'm developing a modular application on Composer and have a question regarding dependency inclusions during development.

Currently I have the packages pulled from a VCS.

I have a core module which requires all other modules.

When developing the different modules, I would like to pull in the core module as it implements the user logic.

Though the problem is that when I require-dev the core module, then it tries to automatically install it's dependencies for the modules as well, causing a recursion: e.g help-module > core > help-module...

Does Composer offer any possibilities to pull in a dev dependency without installing the sub-dependencies?

Romain GRELET

@babaorum

It doesn't feel right having your core module requiring all modules.

It should be suggested packages I think.

Karl Viiburg

@kurbar

The core is sort of like the base on top of which other modules are built upon

Or should I have a separate app package that pulls together all the modules including core?

Romain GRELET

@babaorum

Yes i understand. But in your project. You should not say i need the "core" library. You should say, I need the featureXx library (and this library will require the core library to work).

If you want some king of install with all modules without requiring them all in each project you do, it may be done in a different project dedicated to forming it all.

Romain GRELET

@babaorum

Maybe look at some php framework like symfony, which are splitting into components, and only requiring the needed part in each one.

Karl Viiburg

@kurbar

I took laravel/framework as a basis for mine. which yeah basically is the same structure that Symfony follows.

I do see that laravel makes use of the replace keyword for replacing individual subpackages, but based on the docs I'm not 100% sure if this is a necessary thing for me as well.

Though yes a difference is that laravel supplies a separate laravel/app package which requires the laravel/framework (core) package.

So maybe I will get away by using replace?

Romain GRELET

@babaorum

Yes the replace keywork could be usefull. But are you sure it is the right move for you're core package to require you other packages ? Specially all of them ?

Owen Melbourne

@OwenMelbz

anybody know if/how you can overwrite a dependencies package type? e.g one of the packages i want to pull in, is defined as "type": "wordpress-plugin"but I need it to install into the vendor like a normal "type": "library" is there anything i can do to overwrite it locally?

Varulv

@Varulv1997

FHRITP

Where communities thrive

People

Repo info

Activity