crystal-lang/crystal

The Crystal programming language | http://crystal-lang.org | Fund Crystal's development: http://is.gd/X7PRtI | Docs: http://crystal-lang.org/docs/ | API: http://crystal-lang.org/api/

From IRC (bridge bot)

@FromIRC

<Groogy> It's midday but okay :⁠P

Serdar Dogruyol - Sedo セド

@sdogruyol

haha yeah :D

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

Midday everyone then :P

@straight-shoota I edited my comment to remove the "final word"

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

@straight-shoota if like you say, all your examples should call the method, how do we do to call the macro foo? Do we need to use special syntax?

Bar Hofesh

@bararchy

Head is broken on Arch Linux ?

g++ -c -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-plt  -o src/llvm/ext/llvm_ext.o src/llvm/ext/llvm_ext.cc `/usr/bin/llvm-config --cxxflags`
cc -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-plt -fPIC  -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -c -o src/ext/sigfault.o src/ext/sigfault.c
ar -rcs src/ext/libcrystal.a src/ext/sigfault.o
./bin/crystal build --release  -o .build/crystal src/compiler/crystal.cr -D without_openssl -D without_zlib
crystal: /var/cache/omnibus/src/llvm/llvm-3.8.1.src/lib/CodeGen/LexicalScopes.cpp:160: llvm::LexicalScope* llvm::LexicalScopes::getOrCreateRegularScope(const llvm::DILocalScope*): Assertion `cast<DISubprogram>(Scope)->describes(MF->getFunction())' failed.
/tmp/yaourt-tmp-unshadow/aur-crystal-git/src/crystal-0.23.1-3/bin/crystal: line 102:   805 Aborted                 (core dumped) "$INSTALL_DIR/embedded/bin/crystal" "$@"
make: *** [Makefile:117: .build/crystal] Error 134

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

Can you try to build manually?

kipar

@konovod

@bararchy same error message is in #4719 with Ubuntu. Don't know the cause.

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

@bew you can call it like a class method: https://carc.in/#/r/2dsw

From IRC (bridge bot)

@FromIRC

<Groogy> @bararchy you building with the aur package crystal-git?

<Groogy> if you have bauerbill you can just do bb-wrapper --aur -S crystal-git

<Groogy> and that should just install latest for you

<Groogy> at least I have 0.23.0+13 from (2017-07-17) installed through that

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

@straight-shoota but this makes that you need to know where the macro is defined, and it breaks the logic of include-ing a module with methods and macros and being able to simply call them

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

If self.class.my_macro worked this shouldn't be a problem I think

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

this is quite ugly.. IMO

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

True, but currently you need to prefix method calls with self. as well, so it's not that different

at least if macros are visible but methods have precedence

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

also, self.class is the runtime class of the instance, the compiler who needs to find which macro to call can't know what you want I think

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

I'm currently working on refactoring Kemal to use encapsulation instead of global state. There I have a macro Kemal::Base.get and an instance method Kemal::Base#get. Currently, when I call get from inside a instance method, it calls the macro, but I would expect it to call the instance method. And it's ugly if you have to invoke the instance method with explicit receiver...

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

you could use with my_obj yield to specify a strong implicit receiver

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

this only works with a block, not if you're directly inside a method

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

what is the macro get for ?

Cris Ward

@crisward

@straight-shoota If you're doing that, FWIW perhaps look at how express.js does it. Ie.

var app=new Express();
app.get("/",function(res,res){
  res.send("hello")
})
app.listen(3000)

could become

app = Kemal.new
app.get "/" do |env|
  "hello"
end
app.run

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

how do you want the users of your lib to use either the method or the macro?

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

https://github.com/kemalcr/kemal/pull/378#issuecomment-315873620

The macros create a DSL at class scope, the method at instance scope

@crisward this is already possible in my branch

an alternative is

class MyApp < Kemal::Application
  get "/" do |env|
    "hello"
  end
end
MyApp.run

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

should this call the macro or the method? can you show an example using the 2?

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

class MyApp < Kemal::Application
  get "/" do |env|
    "hello"
  end
  def initialize_instance_routes
    get "/foo" do |env|
      "bar"
    end
  def
end
app = MyApp.new
app.initialize_instance_routes
app.run

Line 2 targets the maro, line 6 the instance method

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

I don't get the use case of instance routes, but an idea of impl could be:

class MyApp < Kemal::Application
  get "/" do |env|
    "hello"
  end

  # `instance_routes` could be a macro that will define the `initialize_instance_routes` method
  instance_routes do # Here using `with .. yield`, the instance routes can be configured with another DSL (could be methods, .. whatever)
    get "/foo" do |env|
      "bar"
    end
  end
end
app = MyApp.new
app.initialize_instance_routes
app.run

From IRC (bridge bot)

@FromIRC

<oprypin> removed really

From IRC (bridge bot)

@FromIRC

<Groogy> mersenne twister random generation isn't that good though :⁠/

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

Well the initialize_instance_routes method is not part of the DSL, it could be any method defined in a custom application subclass.

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

I like the idea of macro only for class scope though!

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

The use case is that you might want to optionally add routes depending on configuration values or some other decision run-time

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

but in this case, you should have a Router object, that you configure via methods or sth like that

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

The router is configured through the application

get method would actually call route_handler.add_route("GET", path, &block)

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

like:

class App < Kemal::Application
  def some_method
    router.setup do
      get "kjhj" ...
    end
  end
end

Johannes Müller

@straight-shoota

I think the idea is to put these abstractions away

Bar Hofesh

@bararchy

Is there a PDF creator in Crystal ?

Cris Ward

@crisward

Int24 in crystal anyone?

From IRC (bridge bot)

@FromIRC

<oprypin> no

Yuri Vendruscolo da Silveira

@yvern

hello,
how can I get current working dir path (pwd) at run time?
basically I need to access other files that are going to be at the same folder, but if I either use "./file_name" or Dir.current+"/fie_name", crystal gets the path at compile time, and if I place this same folder anywhere else, it tries to look for those files at the dir I compiled it.
thanks!

Ghost

@ghost~55586c4815522ed4b3e08557

Dir.current should give you the runtime current working directory

Cris Ward

@crisward

Didn't think so...

Where communities thrive

People

Repo info

Activity