Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • May 16 19:05
    lbguilherme synchronize #11947
  • May 16 17:29
    straight-shoota milestoned #11971
  • May 16 17:15
    straight-shoota closed #12038
  • May 16 17:15
    straight-shoota closed #12036
  • May 16 17:14
    straight-shoota edited #12038
  • May 16 13:47
    straight-shoota closed #12051
  • May 16 13:47
    straight-shoota closed #12050
  • May 16 12:17
    beta-ziliani edited #7318
  • May 15 08:43
    r00ster91 closed #7318
  • May 15 08:17
    r00ster91 closed #7690
  • May 14 17:01
    Blacksmoke16 labeled #11995
  • May 14 13:03
    webhive closed #12055
  • May 14 10:19
    straight-shoota milestoned #12051
  • May 14 10:00
    I3oris edited #12051
  • May 14 08:45
    oprypin review_requested #11977
  • May 13 23:29
    Blacksmoke16 unlabeled #12061
  • May 13 22:56
    Blacksmoke16 edited #12061
  • May 13 22:56
    Blacksmoke16 edited #12061
  • May 13 22:54
    Blacksmoke16 labeled #12061
  • May 13 22:54
    Blacksmoke16 labeled #12061
manveru
@manveru:matrix.org
[m]
but i wanted flag generation for optionparser and special handling for file paths passed as option values, since they're usually files containing secrets that i'd like to encapsulate and avoid accidental leaking of
plus it had no idea of how to handle URIs and the types it handles are not extendable afaict
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
there's als ohttps://athenaframework.org/components/config/. technically it's not coupled with the rest of athena. but not sure how useful it would be in your context. I.e. if you need to support runtime alteration of the values as it doesn't support that atm
does support alternate instantiation methods, e.g. from a file but meh
manveru
@manveru:matrix.org
[m]
will have a look at it :)
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
eh, i wouldn't worry about it. it's not what you're wanting
mfiano
@mjfiano:matrix.org
[m]
I'm curious how Crystal handles the once-only evaluation problem with macros, but that may be a question for the forums/someone experienced with macros not limited to the Crystal subset of the concept.
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
whats the problem?
mfiano
@mjfiano:matrix.org
[m]
Well, I know very little about Crystal macros but consider you wanted to write a square() macro, that takes 1 argument and multiplies it by itself. Because macros take in AST nodes and output AST nodes, and are expanded before the semantic analysis, such an invocation could be: x = 4; square(x += 1), which would expand into code that basically does (x+=1) * (x+=1), that is, the side effect of incrementing x is evaluated before the second occurence of x is evaluated, giving a wrong answer. I'm not sure if I explained that well enough...
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
ah i see
they're mainly just ways to generate crystal code
mfiano
@mjfiano:matrix.org
[m]
You would expect 25, but would actually get 32
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
this isn't really a good use case for a macro fwiw
mfiano
@mjfiano:matrix.org
[m]
and this was a bad example, only for demonstration purposes. Clearly this should be a method, not a macro :)
Right. Macros are strictly for 2 things only.
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
main benefit of macros is they can generate code based on compile time information. I.e. accessing annotations, all types that inherit from another, or all types that include a module, etc, etc
mfiano
@mjfiano:matrix.org
[m]
Syntactic abstraction and evaluation control.
But this problem comes up a lot in unhygienic macro systems, which CL and Crystal have afaict.
Unhygienic meaning that the the lexical state of the macro expansion can leak into the call site
Usually generating a temporary variable that is guaranteed to be unique is the way to solve this, which I see Crystal can do
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
mhm, those can also be keyed like a hash
which can be quite helpful, when you also bring unique indexes into things
mfiano
@mjfiano:matrix.org
[m]
Maybe your head wont explode reading this, but starts out with the same (bad) example: https://malisper.me/once-only/
But as you can see, the once-only macro definition is rather complex to solve such a common issue
Was just wondering if Crystal stood on the shoulder of the giants that have solved it decades ago and included such a thing in the language :)
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
hmm
you can deff run into this as you just saw, like if you did {{x}} * {{x}} but it's also fairly easy to fix
macro square(v)
  %v1 = {{v}}
  %v1 * %v1
end
macros are deff a more advanced concept, they also aren't as type safe and have quite a few quirks :P
mfiano
@mjfiano:matrix.org
[m]
Oh sure, the solution has an easy fix, but:
  • It's not always obvious that there is a problem to solve.
  • An automated solution (a macro) is fairly complicated.
  • It saves a lot of boilerplate (over time)
mfiano
@mjfiano:matrix.org
[m]
Yeah, macros are advanced and come with a lot of footguns that take years of experience to even realize their existence, especially in Lisp, which has a much more powerful macro system. I will refrain from asking more macro questions until I have had time to see how they map over :)
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
mfiano
@mjfiano:matrix.org
[m]
Oh that issue surprised me...
In Lisp a macro can evaluate at compile time arbitrary pieces of code, even methods that are shared with other macros or runtime code.
I did not know Crystal couldn't do that
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
its a pita
because of that missing piece that you cant define reusable macro code
i.e. that you could use in two separate macros
From IRC (bridge bot)
@FromIRC
<riza> ^
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
you can call a macro from a macro, but that just is moreso nested expansion, which doens't help in this case
From IRC (bridge bot)
@FromIRC
<riza> @Blacksmoke16 what do you mean fresh variables can be "keyed like a hash"
From IRC (bridge bot)
@FromIRC
<riza> hm, I'm not instantly sure how that would be useful, but it's neat to see regardless
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
main use case afaik is if you want to create them in a loop
otherwise if you just did %key, it would be overridden on each iteration
mfiano
@mjfiano:matrix.org
[m]
I see. Also I really like Crystal and I don't mean to sound like a Lisp snob, because there are plenty of them. Lisp is nice, but it's too dynamic for some tasks...which is one thing that makes its macro system powerful. Every phase of the compiler can be invoked by any other phase by the user, which means macros can be expanded at runtime and all that. It's a mind!@#$, really.
From IRC (bridge bot)
@FromIRC
<riza> Yeah I suppose that could be a useful way to replace https://github.com/mosquito-cr/mosquito/blob/master/src/mosquito/base.cr#L10-L12
<riza> or several places where the finished macro is used
George Dietrich
@Blacksmoke16
use an annotation and iterate over types that have it
then could build a hash literal at build time or whatever you need