if, have to double-take almost every time i see it. kotlin's solution feels cleaner to me, they made the safe-nav operators convenient (even added elvis-op) and
if foo = some_nilableI think that very clearly expresses the intent that the branch depends on
foo = some_nilable; if fooas well. And I definitely prefer that if
foois used outside the conditional as well.
foois just used as non-nil inside the branch, combining it with the condition itself seems like a good idea to me.
.tryas unwieldy as they are was to motivate users to avoid them. but then at the same time we have this little backdoor (if =)
if foo = some_nilablewould be
foo = some_nilable; if foo(or maybe a dedicated assignment operator as @asterite mentioned)
if foo = anythingis not allowed at all. i imagine they may have had a similar discussion in their past)
if foo = nilableinstead of
list-style-type: lower-alphain CSS)
i += 1by
i = i.succmakes it even more generically useful
brew install crystaland with
Tis restricted to be of type
Vec, which is used for both arguments and the return type. How can I do similar with Crystal, without a type alias or relying on the inferred call site types?
proc abs[T: Vec](o: var T, v: T): var T = ...
whereor even overloading