These are chat archives for csarven/ldn

13th
Jul 2016
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
Jul 13 2016 00:34
@sandhawke Is there a strict rule on which affiliation to use for the editors? Should it be the same as the one they used to join the WG? In my case it is IE.. so I leave it blank?
or can it be anything?
Sandro Hawke
@sandhawke
Jul 13 2016 02:09
Use whatever affiliation you want. Probably try to imagine a few years in the future, looking back, what affiliation will seem best. I'd maybe go with: Sarven Capadisli, University of Bonn / MIT
But maybe the MIT part doesn't feel right.
Amy Guy
@rhiaro
Jul 13 2016 04:43
This evening's adventure, LDN Consumer. https://apps.rhiaro.co.uk/onscreen (tested with http://rhiaro.co.uk and https://linkedresearch.org/ldn/ in the input so far, and all it does is dump the contents of each notification it can find). I can only say my late night app design and naming is getting better and better though. Time spent: 4 hours. 3.5 hours making and captioning the gif, 30 minutes writing PHP.
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
Jul 13 2016 19:44
@sandhawke How important is csarven/ldn#3 ? Is it editorial?
Sandro Hawke
@sandhawke
Jul 13 2016 19:46
I'm not sure I understand what one would say in such a section. It'd probably be normative if you did it, but FPWD is definitely fine without it.
I'm tempted to ask @rtroncy for more details. Where did he make this comment?
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
Jul 13 2016 19:48
My understanding is that, we'll have to define stuff like discoverInbox(url), getInbox(url), postNotification(url, data, options)
Offline; Skype
Amy Guy
@rhiaro
Jul 13 2016 20:43
@sandhawke Can ldp:contains contain resources that aren't on the same domain?
Sandro Hawke
@sandhawke
Jul 13 2016 21:42
Yes, @rhiaro
Designing an API is quite different from designing a protocol. One doesn't usually do both in the same spec, I think, unless one is a browser vendor, maybe.