These are chat archives for csarven/ldn

9th
Aug 2016
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
Aug 09 2016 13:47
Sorry, unfortunately I can't make. I hope the discussion generates issues, improvements on spec, or new implementations ;)
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
Aug 09 2016 14:14
I think the w3id.org/ldn ns has some nice properties: 1) relatively open control (individuals vs going through an organisation body), 2) extensibility - terms can be added/clarified down the line about LDN - right now we only use the inbox property but other LDN-like stuff can go there, 3) very low admin involvement
I still have some preference for the LDP ns because it feels like the right thing to do.