These are chat archives for csarven/ldn

24th
Aug 2016
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
Aug 24 2016 13:37
re: csarven/ldn#21 we have this for now: https://linkedresearch.org/ldn/#subscribing-to-notifications . How does ballpark sound?
Bart van Leeuwen
@semanticfire
Aug 24 2016 19:10
this is what I missed indeed
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
Aug 24 2016 19:21
Missed?
The thing is.. if we were to pick one it is going to annoy and deter some people.
And we asked everyone to explain 1) why they prefer x, and 2) plan to implement x.
Bart van Leeuwen
@semanticfire
Aug 24 2016 19:24
well it was my complaint that I didn'T see a subscription mechanism mentioned in the previous version
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
Aug 24 2016 19:24
There is no point in bloating the spec with more normative stuff and raise the bar for implementations. One of the 'out of the box' things that we've been aiming for is to get existing LDP implementations.
Are you satisfied with the current section on subscription?
Is it that you want to see a normative section or just any section on it to begin with. If it is the former, I'm not sure how far we can take that forward. The latter is hopefully in the process of being ironed out.
Bart van Leeuwen
@semanticfire
Aug 24 2016 19:27
I like it like it is, it gives me clues on how to implement it
and more importantly, that it is not covered by the spec
intentionally
Sarven Capadisli
@csarven
Aug 24 2016 19:28
Cool