These are chat archives for dabblewriter/dabble

27th
Jan 2016
Jacob Wright
@jacwright
Jan 27 2016 00:04
icons look good
#15 is done
maybe we should add functional tests?
Matt
@matthopson
Jan 27 2016 01:07
Wouldn't be a bad thing.
Matt
@matthopson
Jan 27 2016 03:23
jacwright/dabble#16
:point_up: may not be quite what you had in mind, but did find a bug none the less.
Jacob Wright
@jacwright
Jan 27 2016 03:27
I made some chip fixes that should have made that work.
Matt
@matthopson
Jan 27 2016 03:27
Hmm
Jacob Wright
@jacwright
Jan 27 2016 03:27
I’m checking on it
Matt
@matthopson
Jan 27 2016 03:27
Where does it pull the projectId down?
Jacob Wright
@jacwright
Jan 27 2016 03:27
In the HTML, it has {project-id}=“params.projectId”
Matt
@matthopson
Jan 27 2016 03:28
doh
It's not in project.html
Jacob Wright
@jacwright
Jan 27 2016 03:28
still working through kinks in the routing since we’re doing it differently. We still have the option to going back to a routes.js file or some other method of routing.
index.html
see the element with [route]
Matt
@matthopson
Jan 27 2016 03:29
heh.. yes.
I'm still learning how to computer
Jacob Wright
@jacwright
Jan 27 2016 03:30
maybe a routes.js file is more intuitive. I’m still weighing the solution
what do you think?
Matt
@matthopson
Jan 27 2016 03:30
Yeah.. maybe.
I really like the idea of being progressive with it
Jacob Wright
@jacwright
Jan 27 2016 03:31
Yeah, I’m not getting a bug there. I did rm -r node_modules && npm install and it’s all working.
just need to npm update to get the bug fixes
Matt
@matthopson
Jan 27 2016 03:32
I'd just done that, but maybe I barely missed the fix :P
Jacob Wright
@jacwright
Jan 27 2016 03:32
sorry about that.
agree with being progressive. Finding a great solution is my priority, even if it isn’t standard.
great for the programmer, not for the framework builder
Matt
@matthopson
Jan 27 2016 03:33
heh
Jacob Wright
@jacwright
Jan 27 2016 15:41
Do you think mobile-first with dabble would be a good or bad idea?
Many young writers write their content on https://www.wattpad.com/getmobile
Matt
@matthopson
Jan 27 2016 15:43
Speaking as someone who's converted a number of sites to responsive - I'd say pick whatever makes the most sense for getting it going
I've rarely hit a problem I couldn't solve
BUT. It definitely helps to be smart when designing it
Jacob Wright
@jacwright
Jan 27 2016 15:43
you’re saying it isn’t a problem to convert later?
Matt
@matthopson
Jan 27 2016 15:43
Not usually in my experience..
but I'm kinda stubborn