dataHaskell/Lobby

Knowledge base: http://datahaskell.org/docs

Austin Huang

@austinvhuang

@YPares yeah it's an interesting development, though I haven't had time to try it myself.

Given the amount of resource and adoption jupyter has, it's always felt way more stagnated than it should be as a technology. Maybe it's time for new players like this and Observable to come in.

Does it solve the reproducibility + in-memory state spaghetti of jupyter notebooks? If it does would be especially interested.

Compl Yue

@complyue

@austinvhuang Thanks for sharing your insights, very informative to me. I can't describe my thoughts on solid theoretical ground, but I feel sorta down-sampling is with the approach we're proceeding, we use a event system to adapt to the varying of significance each model w/ params contributes to the overall expectation, along the timeline, and present captured sum only with sufficient importance to human for estimation and possible analyze. or simply put, the vast majority of data, even with some parts meaningful, would render each other mutually plain noise. to find the boundaries of meaningful parts from the data is the most hard work I presume, and tailoring by importance should be effective in attacking this. ideally there should be only 1~2% data left from the dataset left for human analyze, we definitely need vis tools beyond there, but yet still need vis tools to arrive there.

Yves Parès

@YPares

Hello guys, just to say that the blog post presenting porcupine is up https://www.tweag.io/posts/2019-10-30-porcupine.html cc @mgajda @mmesch

@austinvhuang I don't know about Observable. I should check them out
I'm not sure Netflix has solved reproducibility of notebooks but they tout they've made a big step towards it anyway :)

Michał J. Gajda

@mgajda

@YPares Cool! Will read it.

By the way, did you see streamly? https://github.com/composewell/streamly
After a few posts on how to make streaming benchmarks: https://github.com/composewell/streaming-benchmarks

I wonder if we can make an improved Porcupine+Streamly pipeline platform that can replace Shake as well?

Yves Parès

@YPares

I invited you to https://gitter.im/tweag/porcupine to continue the discussion

Austin Huang

@austinvhuang

I've not taken a deep dive behind Observable. The creator of D3 Mike Bostock is one of the people behind it. It seems to solve the out-of-control notebook state problems way better than jupyter does, taking advantage of javascript's asynchronous aspects (cells = promises, disallow variable re-definition).

This stuff is far beyond jupyter IMO:

https://observablehq.com/collection/@observablehq/explorables

I like this one which is a technical topic many researchers even are not well versed in (but super important in ml):
https://observablehq.com/@tophtucker/theres-plenty-of-room-in-the-corners?collection=@observablehq/explorables

On the other hand, it's all javascript which would require a cultural sea change for it to take over as mainstream in the data science / machine learning world. I wouldn't put anything beyond javascript, but a lot of shifts would have to align.

Compl Yue

@complyue

wow, I'm astonished by observable notebooks 😲, regret not discovered it earlier, lucky to see here, thanks!!
they even achieved this far with bare metal js, make me feel that type-safety is less a concern at all aspects they did so well.

Compl Yue

@complyue

also the 1st time I get to know about the 'ball' concept, many thanks for sharing! @austinvhuang

Yves Parès

@YPares

Well all JS might even be an advantage for us :) ==> compile to JS

MMesch

@MMesch

speaking about notebooks, there is also this one: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2019/03/iodide-an-experimental-tool-for-scientific-communicatiodide-for-scientific-communication-exploration-on-the-web/

and this one: https://nextjournal.com/

both interesting approaches

iodide is based on webassembly
nextjournal has some functional programming ideas behind:

The good news is that I believe that it is possible to fix computational reproducibility by applying a principle of functional programming at the systems level: immutability (which is what we're doing at Nextjournal). I will show how applying immutability to code, data and the computational environment gives us a much better chance of keeping things runnable in a follow-up post.

Yves Parès

@YPares

"In Nextjournal, you can use multiple programming language runtimes together in a single notebook. Values can be exchanged between runtimes using files."
Files?? C'mon...

David Johnson

@dmjio

https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire-haskell

show some love

Compl Yue

@complyue

I've not been using arrayfire, but love the idea, and appreciate their effort to make it viable.

Compl Yue

@complyue

for Haskell, I'd think a GHC backend spitting CUDA C would be even more sexy, but not seeing a clue it will come into being.

Bogdan Penkovsky

@masterdezign

https://github.com/arrayfire/arrayfire-haskell

starred

Marco Z

@ocramz

@complyue that's what accelerate does, more or less

Compl Yue

@complyue

@ocramz thanks! this place is full of surprises. the only accelerate I knew before now is https://developer.apple.com/documentation/accelerate , now I know acceleratehs, too cool :D

Marco Z

@ocramz

@complyue :) yeah sorry for not elaborating earlier, I was on my mobile. http://hackage.haskell.org/package/accelerate does really a few things and I'm not too qualified for describing them in detail, but one of these used to be rewriting high-level Haskell array programs in terms of predefined Cuda C splices, which are then executed on the GPU. Nowadays IIUC this is subsumed by compiling to LLVM intermediate representation : https://hackage.haskell.org/package/accelerate-llvm-ptx

there are some actual experts lurking around here, such as the main author @tmcdonell and one of the core LLVM-Hs contributors @cocreature

there's also a whole gitter channel dedicated to AccelerateHS : https://gitter.im/AccelerateHS/Lobby

Austin Huang

@austinvhuang

@dmjio very nice! Have been interested to see how arrayfire was coming along.

Marco Z

@ocramz

@dmjio speaking of, I was looking at the API docs, and was puzzled by the use of unsafePerformIO in the wrapper functions e.g. : https://hackage.haskell.org/package/arrayfire-0.1.0.0/docs/src/ArrayFire.FFI.html#op3 ; wouldn't it be better to catch the FFI error codes and convert them into a Haskell sum type?

sorry, the problem (at least IMHO) is here: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/arrayfire-0.1.0.0/docs/src/ArrayFire.Exception.html#throwAFError

sure, it's possible to catch an AFException, but I think the "pure" return types in the main API are misleading

Doug Burke

@DougBurke

@complyue (and other people interested in large-scale data visualization in the browser); I just saw mention of https://github.com/uwdata/falcon from one of the Vega folks

Austin Huang

@austinvhuang

@DougBurke awesome! "initially loads reduced interactive resolutions, then progressively improves them" seems right.

if this can be abstracted and reused for arbitrary backend data + frontend consumers that would be quite useful.

Compl Yue

@complyue

@DougBurke @ocramz thanks for the info, I've suffered much behind the GFW for a few days, even with several vpn like solutions, networking to major sites barely connects. our govenor is insane to ban hard even tech sites, sigh!

Compl Yue

@complyue

looked at falcon, about the data size it handled:

10M flights in the browser and ~180M flights or ~1.7B stars when connected to OmniSciDB (formerly known as MapD)

make me remember that at a time about months ago, I'd had to increase chrome's heap size to around 12GB to visualize one of my dataset (with BokehJS frontend and golang backend), as even the 64-bit version of chrome has a default heap size limit around 3.5GB:

performance.memory.jsHeapSizeLimit/1024/1024/1024
3.501772880554199

seems they haven't hit this limit, while Bokeh already exceeded.

Yves Parès

@YPares

Hi guys, I and a few people started a room for pro/semi-pro Haskellers to discuss architecture of purely functional programs, mostly how to deal with effect composition frameworks (be it via raw monad stacks, free monads/applicatives, mtl, extensible-effects, polysemy, etc) which one is the best and interoperate between different libs written in different frameworks.
Its goal is to be "Effect composition for the rest of us": we want to have a focus on practical intermediate to advanced stuff (ie. remain accessible for those who don't know/want to know about coyoneda lemma or right-kan adjustments)
Ideal scenario: we determine the best effect composition pattern to rule them all and take over the pure FP world
Good enough scenario: we produce insights, use cases and material (or just discussions) about which way to best address effect composition in such specific scenarios and how to deal with interop between frameworks

Yves Parès

@YPares

You can join the public community room https://gitter.im/pure-fp-architects/community if you are interested, and just drop a line if you are interested. The actual room is invite only

Yves Parès

@YPares

(by "which one is the best" I meant "which one seems to be the most suited in specific contexts", I'm not intending to solve what the Haskell community as a whole has been struggling with for 20 years ^^, don't worry)

Austin Huang

@austinvhuang

@YPares do you do much ghc hacking or deeper dives into the RTS? or know anyone that might be useful to ask about the RTS?

Torsten Scholak

@tscholak

Hi, didn’t know about this channel, I see lots of familiar faces!

Tim Pierson

@o1lo01ol1o

:wave:

Marco Z

@ocramz

Hi @tscholak , welcome !

Austin Huang

@austinvhuang

Hi @tscholak!

Indeed... upside and downside of doing data science + machine learning in Haskell, you know everyone after about five minutes!

that's alright though, there's a strong selection bias for interesting people :)

Yves Parès

@YPares

@austinvhuang For my part, I never dabbed with GHC internals, but I think we have people at Tweag who did work on the RTS. I can ask around

Austin Huang

@austinvhuang

Thanks @YPares !

Compl Yue

@complyue

I almost succeeded in distributing custom GHC by source with Nix, but met an annoying problem, any tip is appreciated: NixOS/nixpkgs#73443

David Johnson

@dmjio

hey

data haskell community

I was talking with the author of massiv https://github.com/lehins about making some benchmarks for every Haskell array library (CPU + GPU). It seems you guys have done that already here: https://github.com/DataHaskell/numeric-libs-benchmarks

Where communities thrive

People

Repo info

Activity