Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
    Nicola Benaglia
    @nbenaglia

    Hi,
    I just downloaded 1.27.0, put binaries (linux) in /usr/bin/ and tried this command and receiving an error:

    --> docker-slim build hello_golang

    docker-slim[build]: info=http.probe message='using default probe'
docker-slim[build]: state=started
docker-slim[build]: info=params target=hello_golang continue.mode=probe rt.as.user=true keep.perms=true
docker-slim[build]: state=image.inspection.start
time="2020-03-01T19:06:25+01:00" level=fatal msg="docker-slim: failure" error="open /tmp/docker-slim-state/docker-slim-sensor: no such file or directory" stack="goroutine 1 [running]:\nruntime/debug.Stack(0x415436, 0x7f65e1e39b00, 0x100)\n\truntime/debug/stack.go:24 +0x9d\ngithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/pkg/util/errutil.FailOn(0xb5b4a0, 0xc00001f050)\n\tgithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/pkg/util/errutil/errutil.go:14 +0x54\ngithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/pkg/util/fsutil.PrepareImageStateDirs(0x0, 0x0, 0xc0000d0050, 0x47, 0x1, 0x2, 0x2, 0x31, 0x0, 0x0, ...)\n\tgithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/pkg/util/fsutil/fsutil.go:730 +0x9df\ngithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/internal/app/master/commands.OnBuild(0x9bd501, 0xa74064, 0x10, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc0000a0000, 0xc0000b9050, ...)\n\tgithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/internal/app/master/commands/build.go:199 +0xa83\ngithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/internal/app/master.init.0.func6(0xc0000c2160, 0x0, 0xc0000c82f0)\n\tgithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/internal/app/master/cli.go:862 +0x1936\ngithub.com/urfave/cli.HandleAction(0x99d1a0, 0xa99000, 0xc0000c2160, 0xc0000c2160, 0x0)\n\tgithub.com/urfave/cli@v1.22.1/app.go:523 +0x11a\ngithub.com/urfave/cli.Command.Run(0xa6ad11, 0x5, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc0001ec560, 0x1, 0x1, 0xa8d5c0, 0x3e, 0x0, ...)\n\tgithub.com/urfave/cli@v1.22.1/command.go:174 +0x56e\ngithub.com/urfave/cli.(*App).Run(0xc000210000, 0xc000106150, 0x3, 0x3, 0x0, 0x0)\n\tgithub.com/urfave/cli@v1.22.1/app.go:276 +0x7ae\ngithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/internal/app/master.runCli()\n\tgithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/internal/app/master/cli.go:1274 +0x55\ngithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/internal/app/master.Run()\n\tgithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/internal/app/master/app.go:6 +0x25\nmain.main()\n\tgithub.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/cmd/docker-slim/main.go:8 +0x20\n" version="linux|Transformer|1.27.0|bbc8c5364169f10f69a87dc09968b1b719c4e2bd|2020-02-29_06:51:21AM"

    Any suggestions, please?

    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    @nbenaglia looks like the main docker-slim process can't find the sensor executable in the /tmp/docker-slim-state/ directory where it was supposed to copy it (because you put the binaries in the /usr/bin directory)
    there's a couple of options... one option is to put the binaries in a different non-system bin directory where the main docker-slim app will be able to save its state
    another option is to use the global --state-path parameter (e.g., docker-slim --state-path /some/path/where/ds/will/be/allowed/to/write build your_target_image_name )
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    either way, it'll also try to repro it to see if it can be addressed without these workarounds
    Nicola Benaglia
    @nbenaglia

    another option is to use the global --state-path parameter (e.g., docker-slim --state-path /some/path/where/ds/will/be/allowed/to/write build your_target_image_name )

    Hi, thx for your answer, with state-path parameter I got it working.

    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    @nbenaglia next release will include the official fix for it too
    iliefa
    @iliefa
    Hello guys. congrats for the project .it's really cool. i've reduced my imagesize from 200 MB to 36.9 MB. is there any way to integrate docker-slim into the gitlab-ci, so it does not use the docker daemon? Until now i have experimented with gitlab+ kaniko running on kubernetes runners.Thanks.
    Eele
    @eele94
    Hello does anyone know a alternative for Windows?
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    @iliefa It is possible to use it in Gitlab CI thought it does rely on Docker… Here’s a sample GitlabCI config file: https://gitlab.com/k.q/sandbox/-/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml
    Dockerless is an interesting option to consider… I have looked at a number of container build tools like Kaniko… Definitely something that will happen in the future
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    @eele94 are you looking for a way to run it on Windows (with WSL2, for example) or are you looking for something that would work with the actual Windows containers?
    M Luy
    @mayanneluyun_gitlab
    in relation to @iliefa, I'm also using Kaniko in our GitLab CI and I am finding ways how to use docker-slim and kaniko. Hope both can be integrated soon! All the best!
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    @mayanneluyun_gitlab interesting… is it an open source project? curious to see your setup with kaniko
    iliefa
    @iliefa
    @kcq hello. i want to exclude some files from a specific folder. how can i achieve this? i've tried with the includefiles option but not working. for example ,from php:7.3-alpine image, i want to exclude the files php-cgi, php-config from the /usr/local/bin
    iliefa
    @iliefa
    docker-slim build --include-path-file=/usr/local/bin/docker-php-source php:7.3-alpine --http-probe=false
    docker-slim[build]: could not read include path file (ignoring): stat /usr/local/bin/docker-php-source: no such file or directory
    even if the file exists in the image
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    @iliefa the —include-path-file parameter is a way to specify multiple include paths loaded from a local file…
    @iliefa your example should looks like this instead: docker-slim build --http-probe=false --include-path=/usr/local/bin/docker-php-source php:7.3-alpine
    @iliefa if you want to exclude a file or a set of files you should use the --exclude-pattern build command parameters
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    the --exclude-pattern flag supports the Glob/Match syntax ( https://golang.org/pkg/path/filepath/#Match ) in Go plus the ** pattern
    Andrew Skelton
    @AndrewSkelton
    Hi, currently trying to narrow down the cause of this error:
    s6-mkfifo: fatal: unable to mkfifo /var/run/s6/services/s6-fdholderd/supervise/control: No such file or directory
    Reproducible example on this issue, any suggestions or insight welcome! - docker-slim/docker-slim#161
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    thanks for sharing the repro @AndrewSkelton ! let me check the docker image to see where it’s coming from
    Yash
    @yashbhutwala
    Hi guys, is there any guidance on how to figure out base image and add that to xray?
    https://github.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/blob/1.32.0/pkg/docker/dockerfile/reverse/reverse.go#L381
    Carmelo Sammarco
    @carmelosammarco
    Hello everybody. I am trying to docker-slim one my image created. when i do it and run the container i receive the following error: standard_init_linux.go:211: exec user process caused "no such file or directory"... i run the image like that: "docker run -d -v "/${PWD}/Notebook:/SRC/Notebook" --name "container" -p 8888:8888 --restart always --shm-size 2g user/container.slim" and it works for the not slimmed one. Thank you in advance for your help
    1 reply
    Carmelo Sammarco
    @carmelosammarco
    I forget to say that the command used to create the slim image is : "docker-slim build --http-probe user/container" I need to add more or modify it in some way?
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq

    Hi guys, is there any guidance on how to figure out base image and add that to xray?

    @yashbhutwala great to see that you looked at the code :-) there’s actually quite a bit of information related to the base image information when you run the xray command. For example, here’s what I got running docker-slim xray dslimexamples/server-node-hapi-alpine (server-node-haps-alpine is one of the sample app, so you can try it yourself):

    Dockerfile for the image starts with: FROM node:6.11.0-alpine

    The console output from the xray command has this line:

    docker-slim[xray]: info=image.stack index=0 name='node:6.11.0-alpine' id='sha256:b7535c8c7bee13ca6c082141f5416f2f5d9b8bf68a61cb9e6ce82d42773aa40d' instructions=8 message='see report file for details’

    Note how the name field value is node:6.11.0-alpine, which matches the FROM instruction value.

    The slim.report.json file (that gets generated when the command is done) includes node:6.11.0-alpine, node and 6.11.0-alpine in one of the image_stack sections.

    And the auto-generated Dockerfile.fat file has line: # end of image: node:6.11.0-alpine (id: tags: node:6.11.0-alpine)

    Daniel Leite
    @revolutionsystem
    Hello.
    I'm running the docker-slim on a hundred, seven, java 8 and wildfly image.
    However, it erases everything inside the image.
    What am I doing wrong in executing the command?
    Daniel Leite
    @revolutionsystem
    Centos 7
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    @revolutionsystem are those base images or are they application images with your applications running in them?
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    if you are using the latest version of Docker released a few days ago (20.10) you should download the latest version of #DockerSlim (1.33.0) to address breaking changes https://dockersl.im/downloads.html
    Tom Mason
    @mrmason
    hi @kcq - I'm getting this error on pretty much everything i try in docker-slim on 20.10-2 on fedora 33
    level=fatal msg="docker-slim: failure" error="source is not a regular file"
    ( I'll move this to discord )
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    @mrmason do you mind using the —debug flag and sharing the console output like you did in Discord
    Andreas Hansson
    @andreas.hansson2_gitlab
    Hi in trying to use docker-slim in my gitlab pipeline. But get this ettor: make sure the target image already exists locally'
    I have built an image before running docker-slim
    Andreas Hansson
    @andreas.hansson2_gitlab
    Hi can i include all files in a directory?
    --include-path i have to specify whole path to file to make it work.
    But I need to include 100 of files in a directory
    Anyone who knows? @kcq
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    @andreas.hansson2_gitlab do you mind sharing the output of docker images (feel free to exclude the images that are not relevant). Also can you share the full command line when you run docker-slim? Ping me directly if you don't want to share it publicly.
    --include-path works with directories too, so no need to include each file individually
    toothedsword
    @toothedsword
    docker images
    REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
    fogf.18.04.tar latest 088790bdafa6 3 days ago 1.85GB
    ./docker-slim build --http-probe ca88504b7e59
    docker-slim: message='join the Gitter channel to ask questions or to share your feedback' info='https://gitter.im/docker-slim/community'
    docker-slim: message='join the Discord server to ask questions or to share your feedback' info='https://discord.gg/9tDyxYS'
    docker-slim: message='Github discussions' info='https://github.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/discussions'
    docker-slim[build]: info=http.probe message='using default probe'
    cmd=build state=started
    cmd=build info=params target=ca88504b7e59 continue.mode=probe rt.as.user=true keep.perms=true
    cmd=build info=target.image.error status=not.found image='ca88504b7e59' message='make sure the target image already exists locally'
    cmd=build state=exited
    docker-slim: message='join the Gitter channel to ask questions or to share your feedback' info='https://gitter.im/docker-slim/community'
    docker-slim: message='join the Discord server to ask questions or to share your feedback' info='https://discord.gg/9tDyxYS'
    docker-slim: message='Github discussions' info='https://github.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/discussions'
    Do you know what's the problem of this? Thanks!
    ./docker-slim build --http-probe 088790bdafa6
    docker-slim: message='join the Gitter channel to ask questions or to share your feedback' info='https://gitter.im/docker-slim/community'
    docker-slim: message='join the Discord server to ask questions or to share your feedback' info='https://discord.gg/9tDyxYS'
    docker-slim: message='Github discussions' info='https://github.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/discussions'
    docker-slim[build]: info=http.probe message='using default probe'
    cmd=build state=started
    cmd=build info=params target=088790bdafa6 continue.mode=probe rt.as.user=true keep.perms=true
    cmd=build info=target.image.error status=not.found image='088790bdafa6' message='make sure the target image already exists locally'
    cmd=build state=exited
    docker-slim: message='join the Gitter channel to ask questions or to share your feedback' info='https://gitter.im/docker-slim/community'
    docker-slim: message='join the Discord server to ask questions or to share your feedback' info='https://discord.gg/9tDyxYS'
    docker-slim: message='Github discussions' info='https://github.com/docker-slim/docker-slim/discussions'
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    @toothedsword that was pretty helpful! thanks a lot!
    turns out this is a bug with accepting image IDs and i’ll fix it asap
    for now, try using the image name and tag instead of using images IDs (e.g., ./docker-slim build --http-probe fogf.18.04.tar:latest)
    Kyle Quest
    @kcq
    ability to reference the target images by their ID (full or partial) will be available in the next release, which would happen pretty soon (it’s already in master if you’d like to see it sooner)