looks a bit better for this scenario
You could just increase the column width
because it's contaisn the type name (the default .ToString() behaviour in .NET), but it's trimmed
with or without a coffee ☕️ hahaha
this one is a mystery for me
this one is a mystery for me
i saw that there were .WithNuget helpers but my guess is that it's helps full when thing still builds
i'm looking at few breaking change in my own implementation ;)
one way would be to release both version of my code in release and bench against my own Nugets package since i just consume an IHubProtocol ?
while previous version of this lib where already shipped but the exposed "contract" is still the same, the
.WithNuget might do the trick if i consume a "local" RestoreSource
i'll just make sure
PackOnBuild is enabled to consume the "nuget feed" versus local feed
the breaking change is for
MessagePack in my scenario so it's not a simple one ;)
Hey folks, new user here. Trying to benchmark something that (in setup) requires creation of a resource, whose location isn't known before it's created but needs to be communicated to the benchmark methods somehow. Is this (a) not possible, (b) a bad idea/wrong way to do things, (c) an indication that I'm using the wrong benchmarking library, or (d) all of the above?
@adamsitnik , I'm specifically comparing how a filesystem search heuristic scales depending on certain settings. My plan was to create a set of test directories somewhere in %TEMP%, and compare performance between settings, using
[Params("scaledirname1", "scaledirname2", "scaledirname3")] etc, but still need to communicate the root directory for each scale directory. (Yes, I'm aware of the fact that all sorts of things will affect benchmarks based on disk I/O, and am not yet worrying about it.)
an alternative is to use env vars to pass something to the process
also, is it possible to disable warnings?
liek this -> The minimum observed iteration time is 1.9000 us which is very smal
l. It's recommended to increase it.
l. It's recommended to increase it.
the legend is only needed for the users at the beginning, warnings too, and then you often would run a benchmark and want to see the results after it finishes
I end up scrolling up and looking for tables after each run
is there any update on the possibility to use BenchmarkDotNet with Unity?
While migrating webapplication from .netcore 2.1 to .netcore 3.1, I am getting runtime exception as
System.InvalidOperationException: 'The CORS protocol does not allow specifying a wildcard (any) origin and credentials at the same time. Configure the CORS policy by listing individual origins if credentials needs to be supported.'
How to resolve System.InvalidOperationException?
without using attributes... just: start measure (with params), do something (several times), stop, get results
because you would have to warmup stuff and so on
the problem is, i am in an environment that doesn't do static compilation/reflection. it's a live-programming environment that does compilation at runtime: https://visualprogramming.net/
so I can call warm-up things myself, if necessary
do you want bench or metrics ?
that's 2 different thing
also you could open https://github.com/dotnet/BenchmarkDotNet
and try to extract the logic you're looking for
and try to extract the logic you're looking for
that might exists, i never took a look at it to be fair