This repo contains the foundational libraries that make up the .NET Core development stack.
In fact the
Reset1() method doesnt use anything that is listed in the article given by @jspuij which would 100% prevent the JIT from inlining it.
I've tried Ready2Run but everything runs slower and NativeAOT is still experimental.
it looks to be part of wpf
dotnet --list-sdks list none
Does anyone know of any good docs on writing custom LINQ implementations. It's really hard to search for because everyone's asking about IEnumerables when talking about LINQ. There's definitely some magic there that I've been prodding away at, and would really benefit from a proper understanding of. The only thing I've found which mentioned this was like "see an example of this in the AsEnumerable docs". The AsEnumerable() docs: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.linq.enumerable.asenumerable?view=net-5.0
8 replies
I cannot believe that this use-case is unsupported: https://dotnetfiddle.net/elSDwz (System.Text.Json + Record Types)
and probably generally affects things with parameterized constructors.pretty sure non positional records would work.
p3 has a new API that I've been dying to use
When I try .Net6 it does not like below, ApplyHighDpiModeEventArgs and ApplyHighDpiMode are not found
Private Sub MyApplication_ApplyHighDpiMode(sender As Object, e As My.ApplyHighDpiModeEventArgs) Handles Me.ApplyHighDpiMode
e.HighDpiMode = HighDpiMode.PerMonitorV2
End SubI don't see anything about WinForms in the what's new or any breaking changes
i use this regex
AA\((.+?)\) to get the text inside the parenthesis after AA in AA(text)-AB(text2)-
however if I have this
AA()-AB(text2) then the regex matches the whole string and i get )-AB(text2 extracted out. how can i get an empty result if there is no text in the parenthesis after AA?
It's an old joke, but it's a joke that exists for a reason.
So e.g.
AA\([^)]*\)
@RussKie It looks like they are already using non-greedy search because of the
.+?
@alealpha2000 Is maybe part of the problem if you want to match a zero length that you are using
+ instead of *?
It may be on some platforms, but i don't believe there is any guarantee of that
@isobel-cullen - If they're not, you have a pretty dangerous race condition.
ValueTask is mutable, more or less, but callers aren't supposed to muck with it (and are supposed to ignore it after successfully awaiting it, so don't have to deal with other modifications anyways).