The .NET Compiler Platform ("Roslyn") provides open-source C# and Visual Basic compilers with rich code analysis APIs.
Solving all of those will probably take as long as the initial release took.
And will probably lead to an explosion of attributes.
I could definitely see the side of someone who says: who cares, I'm just going to remove the warnings in 95% of the cases, and its dammit from then on
there is so much about windows that confuses me at times
'moving 37k items'. yup, that's about right
"0 remaining items" hrmmm
"50.8gb remaining" hrmm
4% complete. hrmmm
i honestly can't really form any sort of mental model around this operation
like on the order of 10-100 times faster
This was from one M.2 SSD to another on the same mobo
@ryzngard I'll construct a more complete example so that I'm not accidentally stringing you along. Your advice is much appreciated!
@YairHalberstadt the amount of effort it took to post dotnet/roslyn#38191 is why I'm not jumping up and down to spam them with all the situations I encountered :D
Plus, maybe I learn something in this issue that impacts some of the other situations
what problem are you solving btw?
or is it possible to get nodes that have diagnostics/issues
my guess is that relying on this can be fragile due to async
I guess some package is not up-to-update?
@JohanLarsson I know that you can check the node for diagnostics, that's not my question (if that's what you're getting at). What I'm saying is, if the given node has diagnostics, then I (probably) don't want to do any analysis. But does the analyzer infrastructure only give you nodes when they don't have issues, or does it give it to you regardless? I have no problem adding an
if to check for diagnostics, but if I don't have to do that, then I'd rather not add unnecessary code.
All I'm trying to get an answer to is if the node given to the analyzer will not have diagnostics, or is that possible?
guess we could fire up vsix and get answers before cyrus
By design, not being able to depend on each other
@CyrusNajmabadi can you confirm?
You can check if you want. It's up to you
When you register a syntax node action, you will be called back for all nodes of that type. No matter what
All I'm trying to get an answer to is if the node given to the analyzer will not have diagnostics, or is that possible?
There is no support for this concept.
Note: diagnostics are only loosely related to nodes. For example you can have diagnostics with no relation to any specific node.