Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • May 21 2017 10:33

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Fix typo. (compare)

  • May 21 2017 10:29

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Fix typo. (compare)

  • May 20 2017 17:49

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Correct typo on Ch 18. (compare)

  • May 20 2017 17:43

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Fix errors in CH17. (compare)

  • May 18 2017 10:58

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Fix typo in proof. (compare)

  • May 17 2017 18:23

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Correct typo in solutions to hw. (compare)

  • May 17 2017 17:59

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Correct feasible flow def heade… (compare)

  • May 16 2017 10:32

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Fix a typo in hw 2 sol Merge branch 'gh-pages' of gith… (compare)

  • May 08 2017 14:20

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    s to c Merge pull request #2 from timo… (compare)

  • May 08 2017 14:20
    drvinceknight closed #2
  • May 08 2017 14:20
    drvinceknight commented #2
  • May 08 2017 14:19

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Typo normal to extensive. Merge pull request #3 from Niko… (compare)

  • May 08 2017 14:19
    drvinceknight closed #3
  • May 08 2017 12:28
    Nikoleta-v3 opened #3
  • Apr 25 2017 13:46

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Fix typo in Ch 11. (compare)

  • Apr 04 2017 08:45

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Clarify sentence in HW5q2 solut… (compare)

  • Mar 22 2017 07:39

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Add clarification about super a… (compare)

  • Feb 26 2017 19:48

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Fix another typo in def of mixe… (compare)

  • Feb 16 2017 16:41

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Correct solutions. (compare)

  • Feb 16 2017 14:44

    drvinceknight on gh-pages

    Syntax fix to lesson plans. Add feedback feedback for 2016-… (compare)

Vince Knight
@drvinceknight
:+1:
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
:shipit:
blob
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
@drvinceknight in the above pic you have the utility of both players players playing the strategy ScS_c is 21δ\frac{2}{1 - \delta}. Is the 2 there because of the fact that the payoff for each player is 2?
Vince Knight
@drvinceknight
So that question is EXACTLY the same as in the notes.
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
I thought it was I was just checking
Vince Knight
@drvinceknight
Only difference is that players minimize as opposed to optimise.
So yeah they get 2 at each repetitions. When you apply discounting and use the formula for a geometric series you get that.
Heading off now but will be around tomorrow if there's anything else I can help with.
😴
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
night night @drvinceknight
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
@drvinceknight when looking at the transition probabilities for stochastic games am I right in assuming that the first number is the prob of staying in that game and the second is the prob of moving on to the next?
Vince Knight
@drvinceknight
Yes.
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
cool and also if all of the boxes connected does that mean that they are different strategies for the same game?
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
@drvinceknight in your notes you have a stochastic game where one of the states has a payoff of (0,0) and a transition probability of (0,1) which as far as I understand it would mean that players would definitely move on from this game once they have played it once. Why is it then that you refer to it as an absorbing state?
Vince Knight
@drvinceknight
In the notes the game that has a payoff of (0,0) is the second game.
So the transitions (0,1) mean that you always go to the second game (which is the same game). So once you’re there you’re absorbed.

is the prob of staying in that game and the second is the prob of moving on to the next?

Sorry, I scanned: that’s not correct.

If π\pi is the transition vector: πi\pi_i is the probability of transitioning to game (i).
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
oh right so if there were three games then the transition probability vector would have three parts?
Vince Knight
@drvinceknight
Yup.
So (0,1) just means you always go to the second game.
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
thanks :+1: this is making a lot of sense now
Vince Knight
@drvinceknight
As the utility at that second game is (0,0) basically nothing changes and the game is effectively ‘over’.
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
is that why when working out the equilibria for these games you only look at the probability of staying in the same game?
Vince Knight
@drvinceknight
Yes.
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
thanks have been trying to get my head around that for a while today
Vince Knight
@drvinceknight
:+1:
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
hope they come up tomorrow
Adam Pohl
@Huaraz2
This message was deleted
Vince Knight
@drvinceknight
Hi 2016-2017 :wave:
pcw8531
@pcw8531
HI there.
Can I talk with you?
It seems like you are absent right now.
I have a just small question, and I hope you can see this messge
Actually, I am trying to simulate your example via your git hub. It's called "Relative fitness.ipynb"
And what I am wondering is now is that where can I import the data about "outcomes.csv"
Would you mind me letting know the place of the data set via this email address when you see this messge (pcw8531@gamil.com)?
Vince Knight
@drvinceknight
@pcw8531 which repository are you talking about? This is a gitter channel for my game theory class (which has nothing to do with Moran processes).