flash-gordon on fix-keyword-warnings
Fix keyword warnings in ruby 2.7 (compare)
timriley on master
Fix specific typo Merge pull request #136 from pa… (compare)
solnic on master
Add docsite for version 0.7 [docsite] fix links Merge pull request #135 from sk… and 1 more (compare)
solnic on docsite-0.7
[docsite] fix links Merge pull request #135 from sk… (compare)
solnic on master
Add issue templates Add docsite.yml workflow Add ossy to tools (compare)
thanks! it also works for
optional(:my_number).maybe(inclusion?: 1..5) BUT if I do the below
schema = Dry::Validation.Schema do optional(:num).maybe(inclusion?: 1..5) end errors = schema.call(abc: '1', num: 6)
I get a NoMethodError.
input.rb:86:inoptions_for_inclusion?': undefined method
join' for 0..5:Range (NoMethodError)
Range#include?should work I think?
predicate(:included_in?) do |list, input| list.include?(input) end predicate(:includes?) do |value, input| input.include?(value) end
One more thing provided by @marshall-lee for initializer in our commercial project is the
It allows to set object dependency as either model or model id.
In Rails projects this proves to be very suitable (example below is over-simplified):
class DestroyUser ar_param :user def call user.destroy end def self.call(*args) new(*args).call end end user_id = 1 user = User.find 1 # This methods are the same DestroyUser.call user_id DestroyUser.call user
Under the hood the method either gets an activerecord instance or finds its by id (or by another argument):
ar_param :user, find_by: :key
The question is what do you think about implementing this behaviour in a submodule of
 pry(main)> LocalSearch::Types::Form::Bool['1'] => true  pry(main)> LocalSearch::Types::Form::Bool['0'] => false  pry(main)> LocalSearch::Types::Form::Bool['false'] => false  pry(main)> LocalSearch::Types::Form::Bool['False'] => "False"