http://dry-rb.org/gems/dry-validation/reusing-schemas/ deals with a hash with a key that has a schema of X
oh hm.. that works with plain schemas, not form schemas
on dry-v master
if I use a form schema, I get:
/home/monkey/.gem/ruby/2.2.5/gems/dry-types-0.9.0/lib/dry/types/compiler.rb:80:in `merge': no implicit conversion of Dry::Types::Safe into Hash (TypeError)
from /home/monkey/.gem/ruby/2.2.5/gems/dry-types-0.9.0/lib/dry/types/compiler.rb:80:in `each'
that a bug?
will check this out
re pattern matching, you can use
case for simple ugh ... cases
until 0.10 we only have
messages that merge both errors and hints, this turned out to be problematic in some cases so it was separated in 0.10.0
each { schema SomeFormSchema } doesnt seem to work. Using a non form schema does.
when they are inside a highlevel rule
I didn't get it completely from the changelog
So I tried
required(:user_id).maybe(:int?)
required(:global_auth_id).maybe(:str?)
rule(valid_user: [:user_id, :global_auth_id]) do |user_id, global_auth_id|
user_id.false?.then(global_auth_id.filled?)
end
rule(valid_auth_id: [:user_id, :global_auth_id]) do |user_id, global_auth_id|
global_auth_id.false?.then(user_id.filled?)
endbut i get
>> @schema.call(global_auth_id: '2')
=> #<Dry::Validation::Result output={:global_auth_id=>"2"} messages={:user_id=>["is missing"]}>
you marked it as required
with that I get
>> @schema.call(user_id: nil)
=> #<Dry::Validation::Result output={:user_id=>nil} messages={}>
basically I am trying to use two different params to do the same thing, so either is ok, but at least one and not both, ha
as one rule
>> @schema.call(user_id: 1)
=> #<Dry::Validation::Result output={:user_id=>1} messages={:global_auth_id=>["is missing"]}>
>> @schema.call(global_auth_id: '1')
=> #<Dry::Validation::Result output={:global_auth_id=>"1"} messages={:user_id=>["is missing"]}>
>> @schema.call(global_auth_id: '1', user_id: nil)
=> #<Dry::Validation::Result output={:user_id=>nil, :global_auth_id=>"1"} messages={:user_id=>["must be filled"]}>
I think maybe I am approaching my problem the wrong way
nah you don't i have the same sitations
with xor