the only thing that worries me a little is that constructors can’t be represented with pure data :(
as in, if you use an anonymous proc instead of a method-based proc, you can’t represent it as data
in case of class methods it’d be possible, ie
[:constructor, [User, :new]]
which can be easily compiled as
klass, meth = node + klass.method(meth) :)
I can't bundle it :/
is it possible to make it a soft dependency at least?
have you consider it, I mean?
so it has been considered :)
@flash-gordon , OTH, is there a reason you make it optional?
for instance, people usually don't understand or don't want to use monads?
or just to have one fewer dependency?
there are some libs already which depends on
dry-v and we care :)
but maybe the use of monads should be encouraged here, since we are following a FP style
Well, good to know I can use them that easily if I want
just kidding :)
now that you mention it I'm a bit surprised how often I find people using dy-rb o rom-rb, at least indirectly, these days...
mostly for form objects and validations, but it's a start
if you have any problems or questions just ask
@alexandru-calinoiu Plus this may helps: https://github.com/dry-rb/dry-web-blog much simpler exmaple
for simle API
oh ok it's not api exmaple any more ;] but maybe will still help
