Since your gems aren't considered stable by me - I prefer to cover all the things
will something bad happen?
:bike: time, bbiab
@solnic There are rumors about us :beers: at grill camp or whatever the name was?! ;)
It's in Wroclaw
Grillruby or something... god damnit, @mensfeld what's it called, again, the event in July?
https://www.instagram.com/p/BOfulQVAk8U/ that looks nice :)
you ok with that?
I tested it against rom/rom-sql, looks good
since meta change is (a bit) significant
worse part - specs pass when run individually
that keeps changing between spec runs
and some specs depend on it and they fail
we missed the fact we no longer equalize on :meta too
for some reason it broke some other things
as ie
Types::String == Types::String.meta(i_am: “different”) returns true
which is a bug
you wrote specs that specifically check if this works like that, so I wonder why?
we set meta to empty hash by default, so
Types::String == Types::String.meta({}) # true
in some way
types with different meta are not the same, so I don’t think it’s a good idea to treat them as such
