dylan-lang/general

Dylan programming language -- http://opendylan.org -- http://play.opendylan.org

Peter S. Housel

@housel

That’s not usually the case with Open Dylan; most slots use the regular <object> tagged representation

promovicz

@promovicz

well, if you declare slots as <byte-character> or <integer> then these objects will not be boxed unless required.

Peter S. Housel

@housel

That’s true with Gwydion, but not Open Dylan

Carl Gay

@cgay

I thought that's what repeated slots were about. ?

Peter S. Housel

@housel

Objects can hold raw values, and repeated slots of raw values can be smaller than word-sized

promovicz @promovicz yields to housel because he will know these things better. my memory of those things is a bit fuzzy after to many language implementations I guess.

Carl Gay

@cgay

Greenwich = UCT = Universal = UTC = Zulu

Peter S. Housel

@housel

Well, actually… 😀

Carl Gay

@cgay

These are links that all point to the same zoneinfo file.

Jon Godbout

@Slids

what versions of Dylan are currently being maintained?

distributions not versions

promovicz

@promovicz

only opendylan gets serious maintenance.

before opendylan there used to be an effort around gwydion dylan, but that is considered obsolete now.

Carl Gay

@cgay

@promovicz what about the recent Marlais attention? :)

promovicz

@promovicz

I see that as an experiment for now. it also has some major rough edges left.

Carl Gay

@cgay

Unlike Open Dylan. /snicker

promovicz

@promovicz

hehe. true, but they are less fundamental.

I've been working on the build system today, and bignums.

I should really push this run. let's start rebasing.

Jon Godbout

@Slids

So https://github.com/Slids/advent-of-code-2021/blob/e5d4f4a949716f4f57ffe52305137bb246a4f995/day-13/day-13.dylan#L34 I create a fold-x fold-y local, but it should be simple to just have fold (seq, int) and then use curry to give map a function (setting the value of int to 0 or 1)

nvm, rtfm

Carl Gay

@cgay

Yes, you can do that.

(with rcurry in that case, of course)

Jon Godbout

@Slids

I know realize I can also remove the duplication and put the if statements inside the rcurry

Carl Gay

@cgay

mmmm, curry

Jon Godbout

@Slids

Not actually needed: https://github.com/Slids/advent-of-code-2021/blob/aea4c9607c47bf9d0f59f0f7a73339c21ca2de31/day-13/day-13.dylan#L34

dunno why I tweak it after I've solved the problem, the point is to solve the problem, no grade for code

Carl Gay

@cgay

Good, cuz I see more ways to tweak it. :-)

Jon Godbout

@Slids

you could do better by making a tree...

but that would require real thought,

Carl Gay

@cgay

I don't actually know what problem you're solving so I can only look at it locally. This member?(vector(x, y), points, test: method(a,b) a[0] = b[0] & a[1] = b[1] end) can be written member?(vector(x, y), points, test: \=)

Jon Godbout

@Slids

does = work on vectors?

Carl Gay

@cgay

yes

Jon Godbout

@Slids

I thought = was basically eq

Carl Gay

@cgay

that's ==

Peter S. Housel

@housel

== is eq

= is EQUAL

Jon Godbout

@Slids

ah ty

i also keep writing :test instead of test: for the test keyword...

Carl Gay

@cgay

TBH I had to check to make sure first. https://play.opendylan.org/shared/b92d81dad57ac674

heh, I did exactly the opposite when writing CL again.

Jon Godbout

@Slids

The last two AoC problems were on par with what I might ask for an interview question

Jon Godbout

@Slids

not that it's hard to make, but does dylan come with a count function on sequence?

promovicz

@promovicz

@Slids I don't think we have count(seq, test). I remember using size(choose(seq, test)) instead.

(which is not the most efficient solution, but easy to read)

Jon Godbout

@Slids

Also, can I use non-let to set value from a multipel return function, say

define function foo (a :: <integer>) => (_ :: <integer>, _ :: <integer>) 
  values(a + 1, a+2);
end;


let (a, b) = foo(1);
(a, b) := foo2; // This line fails to compile

The documentation I found only uses let

promovicz

@promovicz

I don't think you can. the assignment operator only has one "lvalue".

Carl Gay

@cgay

Could write a macro. set-values(a, b := foo(1)) or something like that, perhaps.

Jon Godbout

@Slids

Yea, but then different users have different macros for similiar things (I recall you comment on this a lot with cl)

Where communities thrive

People

Repo info

Activity