by

Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
    Russell
    @miller-time
    sorry, probably wrong room. posted in elvish-public
    tunabot
    @tunabot
    [xiaqqaix] Packagers: I have updated the description for Elvish. It now reads:
    [xiaqqaix] Elvish is a cross-platform shell, supporting Linux, BSDs and Windows. It features an expressive programming language, with features like namespacing and anonymous functions, and a fully programmable user interface with friendly defaults. It is suitable for both interactive use and scripting.
    tunabot
    @tunabot
    zzamboni joined chat
    tunabot
    @tunabot
    [xiaqqaix] I just tagged 0.11-rc2 as zhsj discovered build failures on Debian and submitted a fix. This will become 0.11 later this week if no other severe bugs are discovered
    [xiaqqaix] Draft of the release note: http://draft.elvish.io/blog/0.11-release-notes.html You are all invited to review it! :) But please do not share this draft elsewhere yet
    tunabot
    @tunabot
    [zzamboni] @xiaqqaix no mention of epm in the release notes?
    [zhsj] Would it possible to add changelog in the code repo?
    tunabot
    @tunabot

    [zzamboni] @xiaqqaix no mention of epm in the release notes?

    [xiaqqaix] It's better to announce it after merging your PR and having some test usage; that will be in 0.12.

    [zzamboni] @xiaqqaix sounds good to me
    [xiaqqaix] It feels a bit too much a hassle to announce it now, only to announce some big changes next version
    [zzamboni] yes, makes sense

    [zhsj] Would it possible to add changelog in the code repo?

    [xiaqqaix] I haven't considered that before. What's the advantage?

    [xofyarg] apt changelog elvish
    tunabot
    @tunabot
    [xiaqqaix] Does that require the changelog to be in the same code repo? I would be a bit surprised if it does

    [xofyarg] apt changelog elvish

    [zhsj] no, apt changlog will not show changlog of upstream

    [xiaqqaix] Although on the other hand, I am considering merging the website repo into the main code repo
    [zzamboni] @xiaqqaix was there a way to forward-declare a function, so it can be used before its body appears in the file?
    [zzamboni] I seem to remember something about it, but can't find it
    [zzamboni] sorry, this is more for the other group

    [xiaqqaix] Does that require the changelog to be in the same code repo? I would be a bit surprised if it does

    [zhsj] So I can ship changlog in package (though I think nobody will read it

    [xiaqqaix] Does that require the changelog to be in the same code repo? I would be a bit surprised if it does

    [zhsj] So I can ship changlog in package's document (though I think nobody will read it

    tunabot
    @tunabot

    [xiaqqaix] Although on the other hand, I am considering merging the website repo into the main code repo

    [zhsj] That would be great, so I can ship usage documents too

    [zhsj] If the documents merged into main repo, we can also generate man pages
    tunabot
    @tunabot
    [xiaqqaix] 0.11 has been tagged. Release note: https://elvish.io/blog/0.11-release-notes.html
    Ming Hu
    @mingwho
    Hey guys I'm new to open source development but very interested in this project, and would love to contribute
    Ghost
    @ghost~5508905815522ed4b3dd685d
    elves looks amazing
    It looks like its built for doing pipelines from terminal ?
    on ALl Desktop OS's which is amazingly useful
    Kurtis Rader
    @krader1961
    Ping? I just noticed this Gitter channel for the Elvish project. The previous message was almost a year ago. Just wondering if anyone still pays attention to this channel. The only reference in the project is in file ./website/blog/newsletter-july-2017.md which is almost three years old.
    I think there is value in a discussion channel devoted to developers rather than users of elvish which should use the https://gitter.im/elves/elvish URI for asking questions. But it seems like 99.999% of messages in the past year are on the latter channel. I am thus wondering whether this channel should be documented.