My NeoPixelBus library was redesigned so it could work across platforms and support easily switching between Dma, Uart, and BitBang for Esp8266.
\github\makuna\neopixelbus\
cool :). I'm thinking about a ws2812 and esp8266 being controlled by mqtt by the home automation controller
@andig i have no idea. sent a message on Espressif bbs: http://bbs.espressif.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1781
Has anyone got WPA2 Enterprise (username+password) with esp8266?
@marksev1 pretty much exactly what I'm doing here https://gist.github.com/AdySan/bd23f7be5ca5a6a4563f
@AdySan Last I heard the Adafruit library has issues with Wifi features as they only support a bitbang model (they were using my bitbang code). This is due to requirement of bitbang needing NoInterrupts(); the same issues my bitbang method has.
The default "method" for my library is Dma.
yes I was actually trying out several RGB lights at home, this one happened to be Adafruit, the others have I2S over DMA using your library
I remember your HSV scaling was somewhat different from the HSV support I had to add here.
HSV or HSL? My HSL using 0.0 - 1.0 for the Hue rather than 0-360, and like normal if saturation is at 1.0, Lightness only needs to be 0.5. HSV is different.
My library only has HSB, similar to HSV.
At some point the HSL/HSB used Ints by default, but I found to much loss of detail due to provided other routines would cause color issues. I switched them all to floats to get rid of problems/support issues.
Really. So nobody has used WPA2 Enterprise with esp8266? Wow
Lol. It's not just for enterprises. It's a standard in non PSK installs.
duno, i find esps lack many important modern wifi features...
consider the price you paid, well...
"it connects!" would be pretty much "worthy" i guess.
The thing is that it's supported in the SDK. Strange that no one has implemented it in either Arduino or nodemcu.
ohh yeah?
esp8266/Arduino#1633 the PR is merged and this seems to be an example: https://github.com/joostd/esp8266-eduroam/blob/master/Arduino/eduroam/eduroam.ino
typedef enum _auth_mode {
AUTH_OPEN = 0,
AUTH_WEP,
AUTH_WPA_PSK,
AUTH_WPA2_PSK,
AUTH_WPA_WPA2_PSK,
AUTH_MAX
} AUTH_MODE;
AUTH_OPEN = 0,
AUTH_WEP,
AUTH_WPA_PSK,
AUTH_WPA2_PSK,
AUTH_WPA_WPA2_PSK,
AUTH_MAX
} AUTH_MODE;
int wifi_station_set_cert_key(uint8 client_cert, int client_cert_len,
uint8 private_key, int private_key_len,
uint8 private_key_passwd, int private_key_passwd_len);
void wifi_station_clear_cert_key(void);
int wifi_station_set_username(unsigned char, int);
void wifi_station_clear_username(void);
uint8 private_key, int private_key_len,
uint8 private_key_passwd, int private_key_passwd_len);
void wifi_station_clear_cert_key(void);
int wifi_station_set_username(unsigned char, int);
void wifi_station_clear_username(void);
hmm it does have these functions
I think this warrants a good blog post.
if i have a lib that includes avr/pgmspace.h etc should i change it and add checks to make it include pgmspace.h instead or is there a better way of doing it (arduino ide)?
(if i change nothing the include will fail)
@d-anders @igrr I thought we were going to put a avr\pgmspace.h somewhere that was going to include the right one, this way libs would still work? There might be an old issue for this?
anyway, it turned out the max6675 lib that i downloaded through the ide is somewhat silly anyway
so i modified it
it was using _delay_ms(1) for spi which cant be needed
i will just skip it all together
but for other cases the question is still valid. modifying a lib isnt optimal if it is also beeing updated
i meant skip the lib
Need a hand from some C++ gurus... trying to have a class that can call a variety of its own functions depending on which one is 'set'...
example
class foo {
public:
typedef std::function<void(int)> Callback; // define callback
void setcallback(Callback Fn) { _Callback = Fn; } // function used to set which function to call
void runcallback(int a) // function that calls what ever function is set by setcallback
{
_Callback(a);
}
void thefunction(int value) // one of any number of functions that can be called....
{
Serial.printf("yes %u\n", value);
}
void randomfunction() // random function that sets the callback function...
{
setcallback(thefunction);
}
private:
Callback _Callback; // stores the current function...
};error
/Users/amelvin/Dropbox/Sketchbook/nah/nah.ino: In member function 'void foo::randomfunction()':
nah:18: error: no matching function for call to 'foo::setcallback(<unresolved overloaded function type>)'
setcallback(thefunction);
^
/Users/amelvin/Dropbox/Sketchbook/nah/nah.ino:18:28: note: candidate is:
/Users/amelvin/Dropbox/Sketchbook/nah/nah.ino:6:8: note: void foo::setcallback(foo::Callback)
void setcallback(Callback Fn) { _Callback = Fn; } // function used to set which function to call
^
/Users/amelvin/Dropbox/Sketchbook/nah/nah.ino:6:8: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from '<unresolved overloaded function type>' to 'foo::Callback {aka std::function<void(int)>}'
exit status 1
no matching function for call to 'foo::setcallback(<unresolved overloaded function type>)'tried for a few hours... just missing some C++ spice.. to get it right any ideas?
ok.. so the issue seems to be that i want to call the function with parameters.. as this works..
using namespace std::placeholders;
class foo {
public:
typedef std::function<void(int)> Callback; // define callback
void setcallback(Callback Fn) { _Callback = Fn; } // function used to set which function to call
void runcallback(int a) // function that calls what ever function is set by setcallback
{
_Callback(a);
}
void thefunction(int a) // one of any number of functions that can be called....
{
Serial.printf("yes \n");
}
void randomfunction() // random function that sets the callback function...
{
setcallback(std::bind(&foo::thefunction, this, _1));
}
private:
Callback _Callback; // stores the current function...
};