Afri | Parity :p
{
"name" : "node-app-stureby",
"script" : "app.js",
"log_date_format" : "YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm Z",
"merge_logs" : false,
"watch" : false,
"max_restarts" : 10,
"exec_interpreter" : "node",
"exec_mode" : "fork_mode",
"env":
{
"NODE_ENV" : "production",
"RPC_HOST" : "localhost",
"RPC_PORT" : "8547",
"LISTENING_PORT" : "31415",
"INSTANCE_NAME" : "Nethermind-VM1-Stureby",
"CONTACT_DETAILS" : "https://gitter.im/nethermindeth/nethermind",
"WS_SERVER" : "blahonga@ws://boot.stureby.ethdevops.io",
"WS_SECRET" : "blahonga",
"VERBOSITY" : 2
}
}
"name" : "node-app-stureby",
"script" : "app.js",
"log_date_format" : "YYYY-MM-DD HH:mm Z",
"merge_logs" : false,
"watch" : false,
"max_restarts" : 10,
"exec_interpreter" : "node",
"exec_mode" : "fork_mode",
"env":
{
"NODE_ENV" : "production",
"RPC_HOST" : "localhost",
"RPC_PORT" : "8547",
"LISTENING_PORT" : "31415",
"INSTANCE_NAME" : "Nethermind-VM1-Stureby",
"CONTACT_DETAILS" : "https://gitter.im/nethermindeth/nethermind",
"WS_SERVER" : "blahonga@ws://boot.stureby.ethdevops.io",
"WS_SECRET" : "blahonga",
"VERBOSITY" : 2
}
}
Wei Tang Here's the fixed version. Basically we missed: "eip98Transition": "0x7fffffffffffffff"https://gist.github.com/sorpaas/5d55a697e62c2578224115b1f00c1d1c
Afri | Parity Wei Tang: wait what, why is this on by default?
Wei Tang Yeah we need to fix that.
ok thanks, added bootnodes and fixed chainspec
https://gist.github.com/5chdn/baf0eb40cbaff5a90befc52815d6950b
https://gist.github.com/5chdn/baf0eb40cbaff5a90befc52815d6950b
@naikmyeong For nodes we have http://boot.stureby.ethdevops.io/
I don’t know if we have a block explorer yet.
I don’t know if we have a block explorer yet.
whats the point of #1588? the only purpose of such an EIP is to set the transition blocks and it doesn't set any
@andresilva to be fair, the same is true for https://github.com/naikmyeong/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-1013.md
@5chdn It was an ad-hoc meeting in Prague, that is why it was not announced. Nothing substantial happened there, so there is not much to discuss yet. I was actually one of the people who asked not to publicise this before we actually do any work. As you might have seen in the doc, the idea is to iterate private->public->private. I personally have a feeling that performing all discussion in public (like core calls) leads to very passive meetings. I can expand more on this, but please don't FOMO. There were people who wanted everything to be public from the start. I understand that lots of people would feel excluded, but believe me, you don't want to discuss the same things that were discussed hundred times before, without someone actually going and doing some data analysis, research, prototypes. Some intermediate results we could be uncomfortable to share, because we doubt ourselves if they were correct.
@5chdn There is nothing exclusive or glamorous about these meetings - it is taking on more work on ourselves...
Also how do you get Vitalik and Joe in one room without any coordination? Hard to believe this was ad hoc.
And who is to choose the people that are allowed to know private meetings and those who don't?
I am sad for being an ethereum holder haha
the way it happens - you just have a conversation with someone, and then someone else comes along, and then we talk about Eth 1.0 and Eth 2.0, and then we decide to ask some more Core Devs some more questions, and agree to meet in 2 hours. Then, suddenly, there is a room of 20 people - I did not expect that to happen. You can do it yourself if you want to, and have your own "cabal" :)
and, of course, these meetings do not make any decision, so there is no "ruling cabal", they just coordinate some more work that people want to do. Not all work has to happen under the projector lights of Reddit or Twitter, or Coindesk articles. Do you want to ban all Ethereum-related private meetings now?
@5chdn Are you prepared to start publicising all meetings that happen at Parity related to Ethereum? Or should I publish all transcripts of all my conversations with people? Please don't be transparency extremist, there is a balance to be found
In meetings you don't work on things
You discuss things and eventually make decisions
Are you prepared to start publicising all meetings that happen at Parity related to Ethereum?
At Parity we don't have meetings
Also, I don't see how this contributes to the discussion
and, of course, these meetings do not make any decision
There are action items on the document, they have been made by a decision