@obscuren can you please break up this fight and award a winner? https://pay.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/3g2ifb/gas_price_too_low/ctu9mwq
(because I'm not 99.99999% sure. Only about 90% sure.)
Now I'm actually about 40% sure I was wrong... :-/
miners can ignore it
Maybe I should ask Augur instead, lol.
16.5k, so close I can taste it!
@iurimatias 0xbb7
@iurimatias 4,000 gas limit away. Can you feel the excitement? :-D
you guys are also waiting for 21000
@iurimatias bitcoin ceo called me and told me all of the bitcoins would be on backorder on account of Ethereum launching
LOL
I know it
sons a bitches
@tymat play the game: spot which OSes people are using who haven't upgraded yet. :smile:
is it Windows? is it Linux? :)
just a guess
anyone mining on 1.0.0 should be slapped at this point lol
80% voting up in the last 10 mins. If this continues, the first TX should be here in less than 1.2 hours.
So, perhaps we'll see the first TX in less than 2/3 hours....
So, perhaps we'll see the first TX in less than 2/3 hours....
@tymat someone please slap together a quick meteor page (could even be posted on .meteor.com) that helps people say "this is what I want to set gas prices to", then tells you what command line options to use. :-D
it sounds stupid to us, but not to people that are afraid of command line switches
What is the default gas for a TX when I don't specify it?
do you have to pay 25,000 gas to make a new account? how does that work exactly? (or is that only when a contract makes an account?)
so accounts are just your keys
if you need to include stuff (like anything in data, or a call to a contract function) you add those too
oh wait, I think I get it. :-D
new contract = 25,000. sending from a presale wallet (or any other existing wallet) = 21,000.
found it!
start your engines
opening orders on kraken, 1eth for $100
@tymat interesting. I can have a contract that looks at the gaslimit. :D
block.gaslimit
I'll just have it tell me when everything gets to 21k. lol
lol
I'm not
watching that number go up though is like watching paint dry
well I have a script to do it
damn it's so close!
there's a reason why windows folks might be lagging behind.
if you go here: https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum
and download the windows from Automated development builds, it's still 1.0.0
not from releases
on linix too btw
if everyone was building the gas limit would be lifted long ago
I always build from source even on windows/Mac when possible
caktux the develop branch shows 1.0.0 but does have the thawing PR merged, so the builds linked on the readme should be fine
my current soundtrack for launch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAjR4_CbPpQ
do they transform people into rockstars so often that they need a machine to do it? lol
HI there. I put autoreload in the page: http://bb7b8287f3f0a933474a79eae42cbca977791171.xyz/count.html
When we get to 1 tx/block, I guess I'll update it to be "How long until 5 transactions per block".
I just want to see the first transaction go in, then I'll hit the sack
plot twist: there is a hug bug, no transaction goes through
can you imagine... :P
back in Olympic days
lol I love all the publich shaming going on reddit
what if some large miner came with like 1000 GH/sec running geth 1.0.0
only one transaction per 10 hours (?) of waiting. :)
@tymat we'll have a decentralized solution in place to replace them by then. this is as much a race for them as everyone.
@tymat dump fiat, sure. :-D
which will come first? decentralized trading or kraken deciding to open its books?
decentralized trading needs more gas
once we get to 21000 there will be 1 TX per block at least
neverforget
@arhuaco man your junk code on github is probably the most organized junk folder ive ever seen
@tymat it's not luck to get it in there. it should be a luxury!
21 = blackjack?
does that mean I can play blackjack using Ethereum? It's practically an endorsement! lol
where is obscuren? out partying?
taking a break? lol
i feel like someone is trolling, the number of people miningon 1.0.0 is going up lol
shouldn't be too hard to crash them
20310
@tymat should be like this to get people used to it: "Limit: 20256 gas" :)
linagee @linagee buys some gas
I hope Stephan has his finger on the button to launch a blog post. :P
almost there
mined at difficulty: 1,368,309,118,004
1 / difficulty?
or.... difficulty / hashrate?
every 139,716.04819564 minutes?
every 97 days?
my math may be screwed up. (and obviously, Ethereum has not been around 97 days, so, incredibly lucky?)
or is that just stats page?
21003
!!!!
web3.eth.getTransaction('0x5c504ed432cb51138bcf09aa5e8a410dd4a1e204ef84bfed1be16dfba1b22060')
{ hash: '0x5c504ed432cb51138bcf09aa5e8a410dd4a1e204ef84bfed1be16dfba1b22060',
nonce: 0,
blockHash: '0x4e3a3754410177e6937ef1f84bba68ea139e8d1a2258c5f85db9f1cd715a1bdd',
blockNumber: 46147,
transactionIndex: 0,
from: '0xa1e4380a3b1f749673e270229993ee55f35663b4',
to: '0x5df9b87991262f6ba471f09758cde1c0fc1de734',
value: { [String: '31337'] s: 1, e: 4, c: [ 31337 ] },
gas: 21000,
gasPrice: { [String: '50000000000000'] s: 1, e: 13, c: [ 50000000000000 ] },
input: '0x' }
{ hash: '0x5c504ed432cb51138bcf09aa5e8a410dd4a1e204ef84bfed1be16dfba1b22060',
nonce: 0,
blockHash: '0x4e3a3754410177e6937ef1f84bba68ea139e8d1a2258c5f85db9f1cd715a1bdd',
blockNumber: 46147,
transactionIndex: 0,
from: '0xa1e4380a3b1f749673e270229993ee55f35663b4',
to: '0x5df9b87991262f6ba471f09758cde1c0fc1de734',
value: { [String: '31337'] s: 1, e: 4, c: [ 31337 ] },
gas: 21000,
gasPrice: { [String: '50000000000000'] s: 1, e: 13, c: [ 50000000000000 ] },
input: '0x' }
who was it
holy moly!
31337 wei
not enough gas for it
can someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong? :(
eth.sendTransaction({from:eth.coinbase, to:eth.coinbase, value: web3.toWei(0.5, "ether"), gasLimit: 21000})
but I see it still shows 21288
I hope this is not the plot twist becoming true afterall :S
I'm doing exactly the example now:
eth.sendTransaction({from:eth.coinbase, to:eth.accounts[1], value: web3.toWei(0.05, "ether")})still exceeds block gas limit. :(
does that mean I have to retry because someone beat me to it?
let'
{eth.accounts[2], to: '0xb5ce1861d98e85c84531dbc18720278328fd97f6', value: web3.toWei(1, "ether")})
Exceeds block gas limit
at InvalidResponse (<anonymous>:-60926:-126)
at send (<anonymous>:-124886:-126)
at sendTransaction (<anonymous>:-113803:-126)
at <anonymous>:1:1
let's make history! :-D 0xc9d4035f4a9226d50f79b73aafb5d874a1b6537e
@chrisfranko I get that too
lol. Please send me some test ETH: 0x8394a052eb6c32fb9defcaabc12fcbd8fea0b8a8
@tymat can you send me a penny of windows please? 0xc9d4035f4a9226d50f79b73aafb5d874a1b6537e
penny of ether
wow, hands don't work, lol
can you send me 1000 ether or something, for test purposes
:P
linagee @linagee breaths
for the history books
can anyone else get it working or just "Exceeds block gas limit"?
hope this gas limit is not a big issue
unless you're the first to publish your TX
for that block
well considering there isnt many txs showing up, i dont think people are fighting over it
er, gas price
I assume a tx stays in the mempool until there is a block with room for it?
I'm not sure where the "Exceeds block gas limit" comes from. Just client side?
Yeah the client knows there is no possibility of it getting mined, so it doesn't send it at all
0xe17d4d0c4596ea7d5166ad5da600a6fdc49e26e0680135a2f7300eedfd0d8314
did this clear?
@linagee that was for you
@drupalnomad Oh. So this is different than with Bitcoin where the mempool just grows and grows.
and look at the data
Amount: 31.337 Ada
Account Nonce: 1
Gas Price: 50 Szabo
Gas Used: 21,750
Tx Price: 1.0875 Ether
Account Nonce: 1
Gas Price: 50 Szabo
Gas Used: 21,750
Tx Price: 1.0875 Ether
web3.toAscii(web3.eth.getTransaction('0xe17d4d0c4596ea7d5166ad5da600a6fdc49e26e0680135a2f7300eedfd0d8314').input)
lol
@arhuaco this is different. The error is because the tx is too big for any block. I assume there is still a mempool for unconfirmed transactions
ohhhhhhhhhhh
quick, someone send me a pizza. or trade with me for a pizza. :-D
lol
hell, who is sending anything lol i cant send shit
@tymat let's set the price right here. Do you have access to Papa Johns? I can send you a gyft card for pizza if you send me the value in ether. :-D
:D
whoever the miner was also made history
first mined TX
from IRC:
<Semiel> In my case, it took me until now to realize that you have to manually set the gas on your transaction to 21000
@tymat we'd stand a better chance at being the first pizza that way anyway. :P
@tymat deal
so you have to do gasPrice: web3.toWei(50, 'szabo'), gas: 21000
I paid 50 szabo for it
worth it tho
all the new names for branding
@tymat damnit. Gyft would be so slow and I only have an existing card with $0.29 of pizza, lol. :-D
so you have to manually set to 21000
here or privately?
when it's ready!
@tymat I'd put the pizza number in the blockchain if you could tell me how
is it like value: web3.toWei(1, "ether"), gasPrice: web3.toWei(50, 'szabo'), gas: 21000})?
that should work
0xe92bfc194a46e254244a83d8f1d07475cc28c871c12f53c3f9257d3af18e91b5
eth.sendTransaction({from: eth.accounts[2], to: '0xb5ce1861d98e85c84531dbc18720278328fd97f6', value: web3.toWei(1, "ether"), gasPrice: web3.toWei(120, 'gwei'), gas: 21000})
you have to keep doing it
put it in a try/catch
and just clearInterval(yourInterval)
@tymat I got a better deal. Just got a $10 gift card in my hands now. :-D
that's like a whole pizza, not just a penny of a pizza, lol.
if you send extra message
pvt
maybe your message is larger?
eth.sendTransaction({from: eth.accounts[0], to: eth.accounts[1], value: web3.toWei(1, "ether"), gasPrice: web3.toWei(120, 'gwei'), gas: 21000})
from account 0 to account 1
did you unlock sender account?
@chrisfranko I get the "Gas price too low for acceptance" with your command
LOL
the price that is
first pizza TX
$10 for 31.337 Ada
eth.sendTransaction({from: eth.accounts[2], to: '0xb5ce1861d98e85c84531dbc18720278328fd97f6', value: web3.toWei(1, "ether"), gasPrice: web3.toWei(200, 'gwei'), gas: 22000,data: web3.fromAscii('Franko is Freedom.')})
ah, web3
web3.toWei(1, "ether"), gasPrice: web3.toWei(120, 'gwei'), gas: 21000} gives me unexpected token
web3.fromWei(web3.toWei(31.337, 'Ada'), "ether") = 0.000000000000031337
10 / web3.fromWei(web3.toWei(31.337, 'Ada'), "ether") = $319,111,593,324,185/ether
web3.toAscii(web3.eth.getTransaction('0x0e2a5aa2d5cabaa90d3d00c9d8e5f3fb6e48e398df6b60a70bfecd584d33974c').input)
:)
@tymat we may have just made the silliest transaction in the history of cryptocurrency. :-D
@tymat $319 trillion dollars per ether? lol
@ohmannomma .\geth.exe --rpc console 2>/ethlog.log
@tymat should I even bother sending it to /r/ethtrader or would it just be hilarious? :-D
https://etherchain.org/block/46214 $10 Papa John's card for 0.000000000000031337 ether, $319 trillion dollars per ether
could someone please help me figur out the proper dos cmnd line in winsows to send something?
:shipit:
he'll have to take photographic evidence and post it there later, hopefully. :-D ^^^
amount = web3.toWei(1, "ether"), gasPrice = web3.toWei(120, "gwei"), gas = 21000; seems to work
but exceeds gaslimit
I love how smoothly we are taking off. It is going to be studied on the Blockchain technology lectures
eth.sendTransaction({from: eth.accounts[1], to: eth.accounts[2], value: web3.toWei(1, "ether"), gasPrice: web3.toWei(120, 'gwei'), gas: 21000})
can't make the messege go thru..with web3.fromAscii...get the Exceeds block gas limit
@ohmannomma thats because the gasprice is higher now
try making it 400
gwei
yeah you have to get lucky to be the first for the next block
web3.toAscii(web3.eth.getTransaction('0x0e2a5aa2d5cabaa90d3d00c9d8e5f3fb6e48e398df6b60a70bfecd584d33974c').input)
makes me happy
immortalized
tymat how much gas does the registrar take?
90k?
eth.sendTransaction({from: eth.accounts[1], to: eth.accounts[2], value: web3.toWei(1, "ether"), gasPrice: web3.toWei(350, 'gwei'), gas: 21000})
try that
:+1:
and it's on the blockchain! wee
what is the smallest smart contract you could make? time for some more firsts? (how big is greeter?)
@linagee yeah
it will be awhile
yikes. Greeter will take: Creation: (unknown) + 95200
and: Creation: 20181 + 42600 (62781)
and: Creation: 20181 + 42600 (62781)
@cosmicv :+1:
@tymat do you think I could do this? https://gist.github.com/linagee/5d225fb36b480e67fff5
2000 + 41 gas for creation??
could this have been done a long time ago? lol
(it does say gas estimate)
solidity gas estimates don't work well
how can i list all the accounts and balance in the console?
function checkAllBalances() {
var i =0;
eth.accounts.forEach( function(e){
console.log(" eth.accounts["+i+"]: " + e + " \tbalance: " + web3.fromWei(eth.getBalance(e), "ether") + " ether");
i++;
})
};
var i =0;
eth.accounts.forEach( function(e){
console.log(" eth.accounts["+i+"]: " + e + " \tbalance: " + web3.fromWei(eth.getBalance(e), "ether") + " ether");
i++;
})
};
web3.eth.accounts.forEach(function(account) { console.log(account + " " + web3.eth.getBalance(account)); });
here is a better first Solidity contract: https://gist.github.com/linagee/ba00cd53daa4907366e3
it will take gas: 32,663
when you have the contract and execute go() it will return back "ETHEREUM!"
it will take gas: 32,663
when you have the contract and execute go() it will return back "ETHEREUM!"
:-D
It's a pretty damned simple one. If someone can simplify even more....
maybe using LLL or something? hah
well you can make your own
32,663 for my "minimum Solidity test". someone record that gas number as something we'll want to keep track of. :)
I tried returning a string from the constructor and it wasn't having any of that, hah.
I clicked "Optimize" in the online editor and it just about cut the size of the deploy gas in half.
bytecode and everything are all here: https://gist.github.com/linagee/ba00cd53daa4907366e3
here is the solidity:
contract testContract {
function go() constant returns (string) {
return "ETHEREUM!";
}
}
like I said, changed "go" to "testContract" but it complained.
(no idea if that might even be more optimized or not)
exceeds block gas limit eth.sendTransaction({from: eth.accounts[1], to: eth.accounts[2], value: web3.toWei(1, "ether"), gasPrice: web3.toWei(350, 'gwei'), gas: 21000})
:(
0x9a049f5d18c239efaa258af9f3e7002949a977a0
{ transactionHash: '0x6c929e1c3d860ee225d7f3a7addf9e3f740603d243260536dfa2f3cf02b51de4',
transactionIndex: 0,
blockNumber: 46402,
blockHash: '0x249ea54eada07708b29d7c424b8466dec9f1d98067b0be1b89c7ee660cca858d',
cumulativeGasUsed: 24000,
gasUsed: 24000,
contractAddress: '0x9a049f5d18c239efaa258af9f3e7002949a977a0',
logs: [] }
transactionIndex: 0,
blockNumber: 46402,
blockHash: '0x249ea54eada07708b29d7c424b8466dec9f1d98067b0be1b89c7ee660cca858d',
cumulativeGasUsed: 24000,
gasUsed: 24000,
contractAddress: '0x9a049f5d18c239efaa258af9f3e7002949a977a0',
logs: [] }
not sure if I'm the first?
0x6c929e1c3d860ee225d7f3a7addf9e3f740603d243260536dfa2f3cf02b51de4
if there's no to: on the address it's contract creation
How much block confirmations after transaction one has to wait to be 99.999% sure it's ok?
first contract!
eth.sendTransaction({from: eth.accounts[1], to: eth.accounts[2], value: web3.toWei(1, "ether"), gasPrice: web3.toWei(500, 'gwei'), gas: 25000}) should work . it doesnt
are you gunning for contract execution next?
contract Digix {
address owner;
function Digix() {
owner = msg.sender;
}
}
@tymat ah, you didn't return a string or anything fancy. ;)
@tymat can you verify that owner is set once the contract is deployed?
also return value
that's some pushin' and poppin'
mine is just a constructor
@tymat can I verify it is keeping state in any way? (like the owner value)
@tymat so the contract you pasted above lives here? 0xa1e4380a3b1f749673e270229993ee55f35663b4
web3.eth.getTransactionReceipt('0x6c929e1c3d860ee225d7f3a7addf9e3f740603d243260536dfa2f3cf02b51de4')
{ transactionHash: '0x6c929e1c3d860ee225d7f3a7addf9e3f740603d243260536dfa2f3cf02b51de4',
transactionIndex: 0,
blockNumber: 46402,
blockHash: '0x249ea54eada07708b29d7c424b8466dec9f1d98067b0be1b89c7ee660cca858d',
cumulativeGasUsed: 24000,
gasUsed: 24000,
contractAddress: '0x9a049f5d18c239efaa258af9f3e7002949a977a0',
logs: [] }
what will be the first LOG message?
web3.toAscii(web3.eth.getTransaction('0xe363505adc6b2996111f8bd774f8653a61d244cc6567b5372c2e781c6c63b737').input)
this is after using the registrar and the tx going through
lol
I can't get beyond this point:
var helloDigix = "contract Digix { address owner;
function Digix() { owner = msg.sender;
}}"
var helloDigixCompiled = web3.eth.compile.solidity(helloDigix)
@tymat would you be able to inspect helloDigix.owner once you create the new contract?
there's no getter
yeah
but it's first
that sucks. :( I was hoping it at least might hold one state that could be retrieved.
when will the first functional smart contract come around that can show state? :)
will it be mine at 32k? :-D
If you send a TX with low gas, will it expire at some point?
it won't get accepted
but a low gasPrice
might
you can update it with a diff nonce
to change the gasPrice
but if the gas itself is not enough if it's a contract function then it will halt execution and you lose your gas
LOL got a bunch of random people adding me on Twitter
I better go into hiding now
https://stats.ethdev.com/ LOL @ gasPrice now
the markets have spoken
More than 85% of miners voting gas limit up. Things have improved.
shittiest altcoin ever
need to lock this wallet now
ack this is going to suck. I was able to submit my ~33k contract, but I can't stay up any longer. I guess it will eventually just go through?
console.log("Contract transaction send: TransactionHash: " + contract.transactionHash + " waiting to be mined...");
but haven't seen anything
Poloniex address consolidating deposits: https://etherchain.org/account/0x32be343b94f860124dc4fee278fdcbd38c102d88
@tymat does anything at the geth/solidity/web3 provide a gas estimate?
you can just look at the EVM opcodes
ouch!
in Frontier
ideally in Homestead we should have some sort of warning
@tymat can you please execute this for me unless you can come up with something better? https://gist.github.com/linagee/f3c07e97fe3357c633b0
(heading to sleep now)
(heading to sleep now)
or... I guess I could estimate when it will happen, then do a setTimeout....
that would be so crafty
I need to sleep as well
wait I don't get it... Overstock announced they aren't using Bitcoin. Yet there are things linked to it on the Bitcoin subreddit still?
(on an ongoing basis, past the point they said no Bitcoin)
so it is weird that /r/Bitcoin is still showing their articles
does btcrelay include the source to it? I'm not really getting how it even works. :-/
it does say "danger: this code is very experimental"
so many queued things
omfg first transaction worked and now i'm @ work and can't get into my pc again from here
no trading for me the next 9 hours :(
there probably won't be any real trading until the pi-million
can send one TX
@tymat could you do a mini transaction to this adres maybe? 0xee7a22ba6e2a440766740f46a2faccae8078fa83
to be the first one to trade a few wei :)
lol
This message was deleted
Notice: During the frontier phase, your deposit will be credited to your account after 6,000 confirmations (~24 h)
some failsafe :)
I'm gonna work as i'm supposed to i guess
eth.sendTransaction({from: '0x0ab366e6e7d5abbce6b44a438d69a1cabb90d133', to: '0x0117aca5d98443a8ce8aee7ac4bec8450abbd852', value: web3.toWei(0.000001, "ether"), gasPrice: web3.toWei(450, 'gwei'), gas: 22000}) doesnt work
nobody will be dumping
the 24 hours was advice from ETHDEV folks
did somebody manage to make a transaction with geth on mac os x? i keep on having the exceeds gas error
i wanted to do 200 @start but that was always a longshot. Only bought 400 during the IPO :)
omg kraken noobs, they have eth but you cant fund your account with eth. How are the whales supposed to dump eth on the market?
idiots
hey all... think i just hit some kind of memory error with Geth, but only when i run with the --autodag flag. Is that still necessary?
@tymat I already dumped some thru escrow...if you wait for the exchange you never know if you will be able to sell to the order book...
@tymat I used bitrated.com to make some solid trades. Wrote a contract. Everything went smooth. People released me the funds after I sent them ether. Everyone happy...:-)
After made some transactions on ethereum...bitcoin looks like a slow dinosaur in comparison..
it worked yesterday
and its ok shows in https://etherchain.org
hey guys, anybody know how to make Geth to not scroll down and erase typing in Console mode....?
Try this for checking the balance web3.fromWei(eth.getBalance('ENTER_your_account_address_HERE'), "ether")
im trying to
var sender = eth.accounts[1];
var receiver = eth.accounts[0];
var amount = web3.toWei(0.01, "ether")
eth.sendTransaction({from:sender, to:receiver, value: 1})
@Yerne that not worked for me in the console. try this: eth.sendTransaction({from: eth.accounts[YOUR_ACC_NUM_HERE], to: 'RECIPIENT_ADDRESS_HERE', value: web3.toWei(SUM_HERE, "ether"), gasPrice: web3.toWei(450, 'gwei'), gas: 22000})
could not decode, could not decode, json: cannot unmarshal number into Go value
of type string
at InvalidResponse (<anonymous>:-60926:-213)
at send (<anonymous>:-124886:-213)
at sendTransaction (<anonymous>:-113803:-213)
at <anonymous>:1:1
of type string
at InvalidResponse (<anonymous>:-60926:-213)
at send (<anonymous>:-124886:-213)
at sendTransaction (<anonymous>:-113803:-213)
at <anonymous>:1:1
guys does any one know what's a good gitter channel or IRC channel to talk to people who are trying to develop dapps in solidity
it seems most people here are focused on the mining aspect
Switched to Gitter
hi, is it safe to re-send a transaction that has not been mined due too a too low gas price?
using a higher gas price
thx, but what happens to such transactions? will they stay in limbo and be mined eventually?
they wont be mined if a transaction with a higher nonce is already
miners will individually determine which tx to remove from the txpool, based on their lowgas setting; https://github.com/obscuren/go-ethereum/blob/35f271b264b8e4a0449eff325fb75a78299cf9a6/miner/worker.go#L498
ok, thx. so it is safe to re-send them using a higher gas price?
I believe so, although there are miners who are not running 1.0.1 yet (or not running geth); I don’t know how that will behave
no, but which value should I use as the nonce? the last tx nonce +1?
[{
Data: '0x',
From: '0xe6a7a1d47ff21b6321162aea7c6cb457d5476bca',
GasLimit: '21000',
GasPrice: '133396610930',
Hash: '0xb5c81e2dbc09d3a085de90c83dda68c9a0872eb1ff8fea4272950b3fb9985b11',
Nonce: '141',
To: '0x02b2e758d92e953dfc0adc59ba237528e37606f5',
Value: '23282939161918360000'
} ]
Data: '0x',
From: '0xe6a7a1d47ff21b6321162aea7c6cb457d5476bca',
GasLimit: '21000',
GasPrice: '133396610930',
Hash: '0xb5c81e2dbc09d3a085de90c83dda68c9a0872eb1ff8fea4272950b3fb9985b11',
Nonce: '141',
To: '0x02b2e758d92e953dfc0adc59ba237528e37606f5',
Value: '23282939161918360000'
} ]
but I have 30+ tx that were not mined
give or take
Because that transactions says otherwise :)
jep, I have received a tx hash for all of them via the the.sendTransaction() call
I just made an "Ethereum Community" Slack team. Send me your email if you want in.
@drupalnomad why bother with slack if we’ve got this which is public?
@ppratscher ok restart your client please and send that transaction again
hey guys, i still cant send any ethers, maybe its because im not a miner?
@obscuren same issue after restart, some get send, some not
i use in console this: eth.sendTransaction({from:0xXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, to:0xXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, value:web3.toWei(0.01,"ether"), gasPrice:web3.toWei(450,"gwei"), gas:22000})
i specify the gas price manually using the eth.gasPrice value, could it be the case that the returned value is simply to low
what’s the output of
eth.pendingTransactions() ?
but they are not mined and eth.pendingTransactions is not increased
what would be a reliable way to send x amount of ether where the receiver pays the tx cost?
what would be a reliable way to send x amount of ether where the receiver pays the tx cost?
hm, how should then an exchange pay out an account? e.g. if a user wants to withdraw his balance of 20 ether? then the exchange has to cover the tx costs?
if user wants to take out 20, give him 19
thanks for your help ;)
just to confirm once more, if I re-send the not processed transactions there will be no double payments?
If you resend a transaction with the same nonce only one of them will and can be used to make a value transfer
resulting in one of the two being dropped
rule is defined by the protocol
Then it will be in pending until it fill the gap between current and your higher nonce tx
all tx nonces must be sequential
ok, I have never manually specified any nonces, can I assume that they are sequential?
They are handled for you
thanks a lot for your help
So if no nonce is specified it’s automagic. If you specify one we’ll use that one and trust you that you know what ‘you’re doing :)
no problem!
yay i also made my first transaction :D
Hi all, I am just testing our app with geth. Something is working differently compared to the pyethereum client. I want to debug using solidity events. How can I make those log statements from solidity show up in the geth client?
if you run
geth —vmdebug it will output all VM steps
and list LOGs
@obscuren even without specifying a gas limit the tx get dropped somehow
default gas limit is pretty high
afaik
I am specifying the same gas value for all the transactions
Just out of curiousity
it does not get mined and does not show up in the pending tx
@ppratscher did you check
eth.getTransactionReceipt(hash) ?
@obscuren yes, it returns empty for these tx
@ppratscher you said that"i specify the gas price manually using the eth.gasPrice value, could it be the case that the returned value is simply to low"
@ppratscher could you past an example of your transactions
ah, things are looking much better now, it looks like it took some time to mine some tx
its price in Gwei or szabo or what?
@Yerne I am sending the tx without specifying the gas price
it should be in Wei
@obscuren I am issuing the tx like this: {"from":"0xe6a7a1d47ff21b6321162aea7c6cb457d5476bca","to":"0x082b2013c855230fcd4b1b29d67d853de21df88a","value":"1 4276465077430098000","gas":"22000"}
Tx hash is: 0xff669db17ac3a4465f9df4ca59d80dfeae43c273a98308039b8bb55bd63d63bd
Tx hash is: 0xff669db17ac3a4465f9df4ca59d80dfeae43c273a98308039b8bb55bd63d63bd
there’s a space inbetween 1 and 4
Is that correct?
So you’re using the
curl and RPC to submit transactions?
but under the hood RPC
I just want to make sure it’s nothing silly
with the tx object like the one above
var web3 = require('web3');
web3.setProvider(new web3.providers.HttpProvider('http://localhost:8545'));
web3.setProvider(new web3.providers.HttpProvider('http://localhost:8545'));
that should be all of the relevant parts
I see, ok that’s why pendingTransactions doesn’t give you anything
could you try
geth console?
and see if that works for you
all you gotta do is the
var txHash = web3…
The rest you don’t need
ok, I will try again tomorrow, I will iteratively process them until all are confirmed, only a few are left
or is there a better way to send batch tx?
@obscuren thanks for the info. Is there any way to print only the logs? the complete vm output is a mess. The log statements get lost in my console.
What is it exactly you’re looking for?
(The VM output is very clean and structured btw :-D)
Yeah, but my transaction produces a lot of output hehe
I tried to redirect the output to a file but output has to be terminal.
But if you want to make sure log are generated you can do the following:
eth.getTransactionReceipt(tx_hash) after it has been mined and it should include the logs
thanks, ill try this
OOG?
out of gass
@Yerne you should put your addresses between quotes 'x123...n' for example.
@obscuren great I was able to verify now that transactions are processed successfully. The reason why the dapp is not working must be calls.
Is there any way to get log statements from calls?
With
call you can let the contract return a value and you’ll get the value thru web3 from the call call :)
yeah, logs are just nicer, because I can put multiple in one contract :)
my call function is:
function getMarkets(uint[] event_description_hashes) returns (uint[1024]) {
uint[1024] memory market_makers;
return market_makers;
}Any reason why this should fail?
Yeah, but the tx filled the storage that is returned from getMarkets. I removed parts from the pasted function.
I was wondering if there are known issues with static sized uint arrays as return.
but hang on, you’re saying that the array is being filled?
thru a transaction
But you’re doing a call, no?
I’m slightly confused on how you’re approaching it
FTR, calls always operate in a sandboxed environment and are never shared
- tx changes storage
- call reads from storage returns parts of it
so if call A changes something and call B tries to access it, that won’t work
Was 1 mined?
got the tx receipt and logs indicated it was processed until the end
I’ll try something on a private network
Or you can do me a favour and create a very simple test case :)
Will notify you here. Will take some time.
@Georgi87 something like this?
contract Test {
uint[10] test;
function setIndex(uint value, uint idx) {
test[idx] = value;
}
function get() returns (uint[10]) {
return test;
}
}
ethereum devs are showing their intellectual inferiority with all these parameters needed
dogecoin devs are much cooler
imagine
I just want to use the registrar lol still dont know the gaslimit for it though
ah you can provide multiple space separated accounts in
—unlock, however then your password file also needs to contain multiple lines
sorry @obscuren yes it is similar to this case. But our contract/tx is way more complex. I wonder if there could be any side effects.
funny thing about trolls, they only strengthen the community. for instance, he naysayed, and how many people followed with a yaysay
what if the powers that be planted a confederate just to make you yaysay more.
I had a dream I had the first TX on Ethereum LOL
btw the "yaysay" after a "naysay" is called false enforcement and are what make cults cults. js
<--- sociology major
hey guys can you check why receiver in this transaction is not showing?
why receiver showed as "new contract"?
if that's the case it's a contract
I guess estimateGas is telling me that would take 82k...
@obscuren I have checked another call in my contract, which also returns an array of uints and this call works. The only difference in the func. sig. is that the getMarkets function has an uint[] argument
getMarkets(uint[] event_description_hashes). I am checking.
why does eth.estimateGas keep increasing every time I call it? :(
working on fixes for the next release
weird. solidity online compiler tells me even less. Creation: 81 + 53200 :(
ack. can't get it to make a TX. never calls back
why does even this never return a callback?
var ethereum = ethereumContract.new({from:eth.coinbase, data: '00', gas: 30000}, function(e, contract){
console.log("CALLBACK!");
if(!e) {
if(!contract.address) {
console.log("Contract transaction send: TransactionHash: " + contract.transactionHash + " waiting to be mined...");
} else {
console.log("Contract mined! Address: " + contract.address);
console.log(contract);
}
} else {
console.log("error");
console.log(e);
}
})
@tymat how were you even able to put a very very simple contract out there? :(
how does one lower the gas price in a test net? I need to do this just so I can test out a contract.
(TX number not showing on etherchain yet)
0x6fd112af869acb860895a29c1ee55b8edcf1c3081ce13ab2e5aa171b931746e1
wait now it is. :-D there's my deadbeef
@tymat I think @obscuren may have messed something up in that latest "don't send to invalid addresses" :(
@tymat because now I can't "send to no to address"
Invalid address
yep. now I'm 99% certain. https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/1615/files#diff-5ca161f6ea16137a30ef1967569c8418R897
@tymat it would be a good test if you could try making sure your geth is updated, then try to create that test contract again, please
ack. now I'll have to git pull source so I can test that removing that change fixes it. :(
booo
lucky
(if it isn't already, I really have no idea how all that is set)
like an idiot I was like, "let me make sure everything is upgraded before I try" :smile:
guys, is it possible at all to set the gas price in the testnet?
@VoR0220 I believe you want to force the min and max prices to the same thing for the gas price oracle to make it a static value.
thanks for the tip
np. sorry, trying to fix Ethereum or at least see if its broken or just me, lol.
but remember that there's a gas price oracle that miners use
Miners don't use the oracle, just a minimum accepted price (--gasprice).
@tymat I accidentally used master instead of develop. But that worked, no problems.
@tymat so I'll switch to develop and try removing #1615
here is my successful TX with master: (forgot to change deadbeef to something different) https://etherchain.org/tx/0x28a6edb8d77c1f1f5531aa0d1c9014c063dd512c9d6a6eff193b73ba676064a6
0xdeadbeef
0xcafebabe
back when I was working on Java disassembler I had 0xcafebabe sticker I made
Invalid address for contract creation means "update please" :)
why?
@obscuren or is it just me?
I'm at the latest build for .deb 1.0.1+718SNAPSHOT20150807120622trusty-0ubuntu1
(which is develop)
@obscuren wait are you saying, "develop bad, switch to the release"? lol
@obscuren that's not going to work for 99.9999% of ethereum users though. :(
I mean, I can do it, but 99.99999% of everyone is running -dev, as the instructions say to do that. ;)
Dev works too
@obscuren why not merge the branch into master? It's been tested, yeah?
bit more unstable but sure
That's my ask price.
actually @linagee got a discount. It was really $320,000,000,000
:( I am running develop branch and I get:
eth.sendTransaction({
from: eth.coinbase,
value: web3.toWei(0.01, 'ether'),
data: 'deadbeef3'
})> eth.sendTransaction({
...... from: eth.coinbase,
...... value: web3.toWei(0.01, 'ether'),
...... data: 'deadbeef3'
...... })
Invalid address
at InvalidResponse (<anonymous>:-60926:-102)
at send (<anonymous>:-124886:-102)
at sendTransaction (<anonymous>:-113803:-102)
at <anonymous>:1:2
you need this in your .bashrc
function parse_git_branch {
ref=$(git symbolic-ref HEAD 2> /dev/null) || return
echo " ("${ref#refs/heads/}") "
}
geth version should match hash for develop
I just made sure my ubuntu packages are update/upgraded. and I get the same Invalid address with the above.
I can switch to release/1.0.1, but most people are on develop branch. :(
@obscuren Nothing urgent: I have now a small contract example which shows the wrong behaviour:
function getMarkets(uint[] event_description_hashes) returns (uint[1024]) {
uint[1024] memory market_makers;
market_makers[0] = 666;
return market_makers;
}Calling this function from web3 returns an array with 1024 zeros. Expected is that element 0 has value 666.
Should I post this as an issue in the geth issue tracker?
otherwise grab the source and run make
I have geth 1.0.1+718SNAPSHOT20150807. will check to see what that equates to
ah...