Hi! I have several pending transactions from the same account with low gas price. What if I'll send one more transaction with next nonce but high gas price? Can it help to mine all pending transactions queue behind last "expensive" transaction?
If it doesn't work than next question is how to include "self" transactions in mined block with geth?
If it doesn't work than next question is how to include "self" transactions in mined block with geth?
No you need to resend the pending transactions with a higher gas price. Transactions can only be executed if all previous transaction were executed.
What do you mean with "self" transaction?
Geth automatically assembles the block for you and sets the coinbase address if you mine with it.
What do you mean with "self" transaction?
Geth automatically assembles the block for you and sets the coinbase address if you mine with it.
Does anyone know the cause of this error ?
So I have a fully synced geth node running right now, but I can't geth attach to the websocket. Has anyone had an issue like this/knows how to resolve it? When I first started geth I set up the ws flags: --ws --ws.addr localhost --ws.port 8546 --ws.api personal,eth,web3,admin,txpool,debug
Makes no sense to me! If anyone can shed some light on this issue that would be great and much appreciated. I can't connect to ws over web3 on my node either!
Provided, of course, that you don't reset the DB or anything like that!
0xf0Ae4377bbA67801A8a8CaB2bF40777700d8350E
perhaps GetRawTransactionByHash at https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/ec8ee611caefb5c5ad5d796178e94c1919260df4/internal/ethapi/api.go works?
Let me explain. Is it possible to include own out transactions to next block will be mined on my node?
I want to save money on fees from pool payouts
Like big pools do
I want to save money on fees from pool payouts
Like big pools do
In another words how to include specific transaction in block?
Hi friends, I have a quick question here. I hope some could help me out.
I am running a local Geth full node, with "--rpcapi eth,net,web3,txpool". Running uniswap local is working excellent. Running balancer pool information it gives me errors JSON RPC. "Failure querying onchain balances" . Running a infura node in balancer and everything's works. Am I missing some arguments for my local node? Maybe wss ? Could someone post me an example? Also I want graphql enabled so I can run a local blockchain. Thanks
I am running a local Geth full node, with "--rpcapi eth,net,web3,txpool". Running uniswap local is working excellent. Running balancer pool information it gives me errors JSON RPC. "Failure querying onchain balances" . Running a infura node in balancer and everything's works. Am I missing some arguments for my local node? Maybe wss ? Could someone post me an example? Also I want graphql enabled so I can run a local blockchain. Thanks
running into an issue with a Geth node I'm running on Kubernetes. The discovery port is set to 1024 instead of 30303 as is standard and intended in this case. I'm now explicitly passing in the --port=30303 flag, but it's not resolving the issue. I'm using a persistent disk for the chaindata, so I'm thinking there's some config file where I could modify to change the discovery port back to 30303 manually there. Is this the case? And where would I find this file/setting? If not, any other suggestions for how to resolve this issue?
Hello, would someone have a solution for this problem ?
https://ethereum.stackexchange.com/questions/88167/pending-transactions-logs-issue
@_Anarz_twitter logs are not saved in the DB until the block is fully formed and mined so there is no native way to access logs of pending transactions - one solution i can think of is making a modified endpoint which will be similar to
eth_call but will return the full execution result (and maybe some other things) rather than just the rlp encoded return variable
@thor-ragnarok Thank you for your answer. So the logs are not saved in the db and therefore are not accessible by the API but they do exist, don't they? Insofar as the pending block is created by the node on which mining is activated, it must have "simulated" the execution of these transactions and therefore have generated logs that are located somewhere, right?
@thor-ragnarok Does something like this should work as a custom endpoint?
func (s *PublicBlockChainAPI) GetPendingLogs(ctx context.Context) ([]*types.Log, error) {
state, _, err := s.b.StateAndHeaderByNumberOrHash(ctx, rpc.PendingBlockNumber)
if state == nil || err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return state.Logs(), state.Error()
}
@_Anarz_twitter ^ dry pinged the wrong person -.-
Sry* - and I have fat fingers
Anyone know about full stack solutions to actually roll out a token? What I mean is....I know how to deploy an ERC20 smart contract...However, I think you'd agree there are tons of other parts to the execution if someone like a restaurant wants to do their own coin!? Like.....How sell the tokens in a secure manner to the public? How implement something like gift cards? What wallet to use? etc. Any advice?
@holiman On the private network, we have contract code as genesis contract. We want to update it in the running network. We are thinking it following way:
Add new field in genesis say contract_alloc and it will have block number n, contract address, and new code. At n block, it will take in affect at give contract address and remains after that nth block. To do so, we have to change the state DB.
Do you think is it the right approach? If yes, when and where should we make state DB changes? In engine.finalize of n-1?
