Hello @all, I ahve the following example :
object testSpec
extends Specification {
def is =
s2"""
${Step(firstStep)}
example of execution1 $e1
example of execution2 $e2
example of execution3 $e3
example of execution4 $e4
${Step(secondStep)}
example of execution1 $e1
example of execution2 $e2
example of execution3 $e3
example of execution4 $e4
"""
}Is it possible to minimize the number of lines in the description and put all that in a loop in order to execute the firstStep and secondStep on each example of execution?
Hi all, is it possible to achive this one:
import org.specs2._
import specification._
import core.Fragments
import runner.SpecificationsFinder
// run this specification with `all` to execute
// all linked specifications
class Database extends Specification { def is =
"All database specifications".title ^ br ^
link(new Create).hide ^
Fragments.foreach(specs)(s => link(s) ^ br) ^
link(new Delete).hide
def specs = specifications(pattern = ".*Db.*")
}
// start the database with this specification
class Create extends Specification { def is = xonly ^
step("create database".pp)
}
// stop the database with this specification
class Delete extends Specification { def is = xonly ^
step("delete database".pp)
}
// an example of a specification using the database
// it will be invoked by the "Database" spec because
// its name matches ".*Db.*"
class Db1Spec extends Specification { def is = s2"""
test $db
"""
def db = { println("use the database - 1"); ok }
}
class Db2Spec extends Specification { def is = s2"""
test $db
"""
def db = { println("use the database - 2"); ok }
}in specs2 4.3.4?
I try to fix error that beforeAll and After all run in parallell with test suite
@a_nigredo_twitter sorry about that, there is a bug: etorreborre/specs2#797. I will try to fix it ASAP
@predragstefanovic unfortunately not at the moment
Unfortunately not soon. I am still (slowly) working on a version 5 which removes a few features that are not supported by Dotty, like
DelayedInit for mutable specs, but I haven’t had a look yet at the s2 macro. There seems to be a way to do it: https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/issues/5095#issuecomment-423299541
Yeah, there are a couple of examples in the Dotty repo, like this: https://github.com/lampepfl/dotty/blob/master/tests/run-macros/xml-interpolation-1/XmlQuote_1.scala
Should probably be able to do the same for the
s2 macro.
hello - I am unable to use the cats none[Int] syntax within a specs2 Specification because in there none refers to a matcher rather than to the cats syntax. Any ideas how to avoid the problem? (love specs2 btw). https://scastie.scala-lang.org/philipschwarz/Q0pHNey3SLqNixeTJj5q0A/71
ScalaJS is supported but I am not a primary user so it is hard for me to tell. Using a Future as a result in an example should work thanks to this implicit:
implicit class futureAsResult[T](f: => Future[T])(implicit ee: ExecutionEnv, asResult: AsResult[T]) extends FutureAsResult[T](f)So if your class has an implicit ExecutionEnv like class MySpec(implicit ee: ExecutionEnv) extends Specificationyou should be able to write ”test ok” >> Future(ok)
Will try to pin it down. Going to check to see if its the awaitFor. This is the PR I found it on, but is obviously not minimal yet. - https://github.com/djspiewak/cats-effect-testing/pull/70/files
My guess is its this line. As scalajs can't await.
https://github.com/etorreborre/specs2/blob/8305db76c5084e4b3ce5827ce23117f6fb6beee4/common/shared/src/main/scala/org/specs2/concurrent/FutureAwait.scala#L28
https://github.com/etorreborre/specs2/blob/8305db76c5084e4b3ce5827ce23117f6fb6beee4/common/shared/src/main/scala/org/specs2/concurrent/FutureAwait.scala#L28
@etorreborre Heres a minimal reproduction thats blocking me from hitting the later one. Can't initialize the class. First one seems to work so theres something between the ExecutionEnv and the AsResult instance thats ending me up in the painful point, as the
https://github.com/ChristopherDavenport/specs2scalajstest/blob/master/core/src/test/scala/io/chrisdavenport/specs2jstest/MainSpec.scala#L18
Future(ok) works on scalajs with the global EC.https://github.com/ChristopherDavenport/specs2scalajstest/blob/master/core/src/test/scala/io/chrisdavenport/specs2jstest/MainSpec.scala#L18
You can use the
AroundEach trait for thatclass MySpec extends mutable.Specification with SkipAll {
"this is ok" >> ok
"this is ko" >> ko
}
import org.specs2.specification._
import org.specs2.execute._
trait SkipAll extends AroundEach {
def around[R : AsResult](r: =>R) =
Skipped("skipped")
}
@ChristopherDavenport if you want to try out the latest release: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/specs2/specs2-core_2.13/4.10.0/
@etorreborre So the only way I see by Future to get to Result is via await. How do you evaluate the
Future[Result] for the specs and is there a way I could create similar functionality for IO? I'm missing a piece of code somewhere but I'm not sure where it is inside the specs2 repo.
Sorry this is not necessarily super well documented but you can use the
AsExecution typeclass to integrate IO:
import org.specs2.execute.{AsResult}
import org.specs2.specification.core.{AsExecution, Execution}
import scala.concurrent._
case class IO[T](run: ExecutionContext => Future[T])
object IO {
def successful[T](t: =>T): IO[T] =
IO(_ => Future.successful(t))
implicit def ioAsExecution[R : AsResult]: AsExecution[IO[R]] = new AsExecution[IO[R]] {
def execute(io: =>IO[R]): Execution =
Execution.withEnvAsync(env => io.run(env.executionContext))
}
}
class TestMutableSpec extends mutable.Specification {
"e1" >> {
IO.successful(ok)
}
}
:wave: I have this exact problem with specs2-mock: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49070901/mocking-a-method-which-returns-an-fs2-stream
Is there a remedy? I can't use the solution suggested by the answerers since the API is fix. Thank you.
Is there a remedy? I can't use the solution suggested by the answerers since the API is fix. Thank you.