These are chat archives for evhub/coconut

27th
Aug 2016
Chuck Daniels
@chuckwondo
Aug 27 2016 21:16
@evhub I found a bug that I’ll create an issue for, but I’d like to know how to title the issue. It has to do with the shorthand functional notation that you’ve extended to support multiple lines (in the develop branch). Now that it supports multiple lines and automatically inserts the return keyword in front of the final expression, the term “shorthand functional notation” no longer seems applicable. What term would you like to use so that you readily understand what it means, or do you simply want to stick with the original term for convenience?