Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • 06:25
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • 06:25

    ejsmith on elastic7

    Minor (compare)

  • 06:00
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • 06:00

    ejsmith on elastic7

    Add missing task id (compare)

  • Dec 13 22:43
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • Dec 13 22:43

    ejsmith on elastic7

    More reindex job changes (compare)

  • Dec 13 15:46
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • Dec 13 15:46

    ejsmith on elastic7

    Just retry 3 times (compare)

  • Dec 13 15:44
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • Dec 13 15:44

    ejsmith on elastic7

    More log message changes (compare)

  • Dec 13 14:25
    niemyjski synchronize #452
  • Dec 13 14:25

    niemyjski on elastic7

    Added retry reindex for disconn… (compare)

  • Dec 13 14:09
    niemyjski synchronize #452
  • Dec 13 14:09

    niemyjski on elastic7

    Updated migration to retry sock… (compare)

  • Dec 13 04:51
  • Dec 13 03:28
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • Dec 13 03:28

    ejsmith on elastic7

    Oops progress (compare)

  • Dec 13 03:04
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • Dec 13 03:04

    ejsmith on elastic7

    More log formatting (compare)

  • Dec 13 02:02
    ejsmith synchronize #452
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
we need to finish that up
and then hook up user agent stuff that I just committed to .net
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
I need to add an issue for the x-forwarded-for header thing.
that could be a huge help for identifying end users properly
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah
but might not ever do anything
well
I guess it might if we start going off of ip address instead of user
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
@frankebersoll what needs to be done again
we wanted to move it ot a base class that shared more code?
or did it just need testing
I can test it now or I can work on the user agent stuff that’s in the .net client
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
well, we do go off of ip for anonymous ones.
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
@ejsmith not currently...
sigh so much to do which one
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
yeah, neverending.
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
have .net and js things to get done but also want to take a look ath foundatio.. unless you can do that ejsmith
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
man these foundatio tests are getting slower
and I have like 8 failing right now
in that branch
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
Yeah, we need to spend some time on them.
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
so down to one failing test
:)
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
Cool
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
I just did some serious renaming of the azure libs
was a few inconsistencies
omfg
they FINALLY fixed the stupid azure portal graphs
where the date ranges would overlay
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
@ejsmith we have a few azure message bus tests failing
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
ok
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
can you see if they are failing for you
I’m on a crappy internet right now
and don’t know if it’s latency
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
not right now
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
ok
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
can take a look with you soon
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
kk
Frank Ebersoll
@frankebersoll
@niemyjski I am doing the refactoring right now
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
cool
thanks
guess it’s time to update haha
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
just update to aurelia and call it a day
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
@srijken I’m sorry for taking so long to get to this
but todays your day
exceptionless/Exceptionless.Net#15
how do you feel about a plugin that sits with a really low priority and when it sees an aggregate exception it does two things..
cancels it, and calls flatten on it and submits x new events per exception
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
I think that would work.