Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • Oct 14 02:53
    wmowm commented #459
  • Oct 12 15:59
    niemyjski commented #459
  • Oct 12 15:57
    niemyjski edited #459
  • Oct 12 12:54
    niemyjski synchronize #452
  • Oct 12 12:54

    niemyjski on elastic7

    Fixed serializer null reference… Fixed all Swagger issues. (compare)

  • Oct 12 12:26
    niemyjski synchronize #452
  • Oct 12 12:26

    niemyjski on elastic7

    Updated to latest foundatio rep… (compare)

  • Oct 12 12:24
    niemyjski synchronize #452
  • Oct 12 12:24

    niemyjski on elastic7

    Fixed elasticsearch serializer … (compare)

  • Oct 12 11:01
    wmowm opened #459
  • Oct 11 11:21
    niemyjski commented #458
  • Oct 10 21:18
    kiquenet opened #458
  • Oct 10 13:30
    niemyjski updated the wiki
  • Oct 10 09:20
  • Oct 10 03:36
  • Oct 09 15:54
    john-roland closed #456
  • Oct 09 15:54
    john-roland commented #456
  • Oct 09 14:12
    niemyjski labeled #457
  • Oct 09 14:12
    niemyjski labeled #457
  • Oct 09 14:12
    niemyjski commented #457
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
so talking about offline storage for pal?
pcl
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
I think so I asked for clarificiation
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
I want to wait until RC2 comes out.
I think we can simplify things in the client then.
with the TFMs
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah
TFM?
Matt Oswald
@moswald
hey guys, I've been out of town for the past three days and didn't really get to read much on the PR I submitted
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
It’s all good :)
Matt Oswald
@moswald
based on the feedback, I wonder if I should abandon it and let you guys discuss further, it seems like maybe you have larger plans
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
no pressure over here, we know you guys work on this in your free time and it’s greatly appreciated
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
Yeah, I think it was good to take a stab at it. I think there just needs to be some discussion around it.
We know we need to do it, just what’s the best way long term.
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
@moswald yeah, we are just trying to figure out what the best approach is and you got the discussion started and I think that is awesome. I think we just need to iterate from there.
we just want to make sure that we come up with a solution that we all agree with.
Matt Oswald
@moswald
roger that - I'm just here to help ;)
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
That’s greatly appreciated
I’m testing the .net client for release and then I’ll take a look at the pr and add some feedback
I saw that there was activity on it this weekend I just was busy with family
@srijken seems to be working really good :D
@ejsmith when I get this user stuff done
I’m adding the ability to view the raw event json
I need it like every day
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
Screen Shot 2016-04-11 at 11.04.35 AM.png
@srijken I’m taking a look into this
seems like when I click between two different errors multiple times I get a series of them
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
yeah, I think that is definitely useful
and should be quick
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
@ejsmith @srijken
it appears we are doing
            hashCode = (hashCode * 397) ^ TotalPhysicalMemory.GetHashCode();
            hashCode = (hashCode * 397) ^ AvailablePhysicalMemory.GetHashCode();
            hashCode = (hashCode * 397) ^ ProcessMemorySize.GetHashCode();
            hashCode = (hashCode * 397) ^ (ThreadName == null ? 0 : ThreadName.GetHashCode());
            hashCode = (hashCode * 397) ^ (ThreadId == null ? 0 : ThreadId.GetHashCode());
which the memory one for process memory is changing by .1mb and causing it to not be deduplicated
wondering if thread id is changing it as well
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
hmm
total memory is fine
but I don’t think the memory and thread ones should be there
I’m seeing reference id interferring as it’s stored in a cookie
so it’s changing that on request info
should we remove cookies from the gethashcode logic too
?
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
no
why would we do that?
if the cookies are different, don’t we want to see them?
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
because were updating the lastreferenceid cookie value and then it’s not deduped
yeah I guess but if everything else matches then it’s kind of a dup no?
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
yeah, that sucks
if we can skip that one
that would be good.