Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • Nov 20 15:34

    dependabot[bot] on npm_and_yarn

    (compare)

  • Nov 20 15:34

    niemyjski on master

    Bump js-yaml from 3.11.0 to 3.1… Merge pull request #88 from exc… (compare)

  • Nov 20 15:34
    niemyjski closed #88
  • Nov 20 14:26
    CLAassistant commented #88
  • Nov 20 14:25
    dependabot[bot] labeled #88
  • Nov 20 14:25
    dependabot[bot] opened #88
  • Nov 20 14:25

    dependabot[bot] on npm_and_yarn

    Bump js-yaml from 3.11.0 to 3.1… (compare)

  • Nov 20 14:24

    dependabot[bot] on npm_and_yarn

    (compare)

  • Nov 20 14:24

    niemyjski on master

    Bump mixin-deep from 1.3.1 to 1… Merge pull request #87 from exc… (compare)

  • Nov 20 14:24
    niemyjski closed #87
  • Nov 20 03:01
  • Nov 19 09:24
  • Nov 18 01:47
  • Nov 15 15:45
    niemyjski synchronize #452
  • Nov 15 15:45

    niemyjski on elastic7

    Fixed reindex mapping issues on… (compare)

  • Nov 15 03:05
    foresightyj closed #467
  • Nov 15 03:05
    foresightyj commented #467
  • Nov 15 03:03
    foresightyj edited #467
  • Nov 15 03:02
    foresightyj opened #467
  • Nov 14 14:41
    niemyjski synchronize #452
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
@ejsmith this stuff is pretty specific to exceptionless
hitting some roadblocks
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
with the aggregations?
stuff like avg:somefield min:somefield, max:somefield
that shouldn’t be specific
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
i know
but we need access to the elastic index for alias name
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
so what is specific?
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
can share my screen quick
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
what do you mean alias name
can’t do that.
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
No generic way to inject the index on the context unless we add a constraint to the index with a <T> for the hell of it to auto inject it
then the date stuff is not generic but something we’d have to ahve
that’s only for terms tho
Screen Shot 2016-04-11 at 4.12.07 PM.png
            .WithDateRange(utcStart, utcEnd, EventIndex.Fields.PersistentEvent.Date)
            .WithIndices(utcStart, utcEnd, $"'{_eventIndex.VersionedName}-'yyyyMM”); 
is the biggest thing
you want to do smart date ranges
Sander Rijken
@srijken
@niemyjski no ReaderWriterLock in PCL it seems, so just keep the lock the way it is?
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah I guess
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
that is up to the user to pass in a filter and system filter just like any other thing in the repo
aggregations are on top of that.
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
wonder if we can get away with non concurrent queues but is it worth it? what might it introduce
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
use the exact same query builder stuff
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah
ok
Sander Rijken
@srijken
and, how much do you think we gain?
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
so object query as first param
yeah good idea :)
@srijken I’m not sure if anything but less chances to dead lock???
between there lock implementations and ours but I don’t see how that would happen with our locks being around everything
see first answer
that kinda suggests that it is in PCL?
oh where’s there’s a bunch of platforms
just leave it
could try a normal queue, and see if the tests + your recent problem are still OK?
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
really hope the new TFM stuff will make this simpler.
Sander Rijken
@srijken
TFM?
is that missing an R in front? ;)
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
lol no
Target Framework Moniker
Sander Rijken
@srijken
right
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
the stuff where you target an API surface area and all platforms that support that contract or higher just wokr.
and you don’t have to do stuff for each platform
Sander Rijken
@srijken
@niemyjski merge conflict is fixed
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yay
feel free to merge it in
Sander Rijken
@srijken
can’t ;)
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
I’m fine either way no?