Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • 04:51
  • 03:28
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • 03:28

    ejsmith on elastic7

    Oops progress (compare)

  • 03:04
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • 03:04

    ejsmith on elastic7

    More log formatting (compare)

  • 02:02
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • 02:02

    ejsmith on elastic7

    Fix tests? (compare)

  • 01:18
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • 01:18

    ejsmith on elastic7

    Change duration format (compare)

  • 00:39
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • 00:39

    ejsmith on elastic7

    Only report progress once every… (compare)

  • Dec 12 23:26
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • Dec 12 23:26

    ejsmith on elastic7

    Show progress of index that is … (compare)

  • Dec 12 23:21
    ejsmith synchronize #452
  • Dec 12 23:21

    ejsmith on elastic7

    Change migration logging to not… (compare)

  • Dec 12 14:47
    niemyjski synchronize #452
  • Dec 12 14:47

    niemyjski on elastic7

    add failed task ids to log mess… (compare)

  • Dec 12 09:40
    zhangyiqiu starred exceptionless/Exceptionless
  • Dec 12 07:45
  • Dec 12 05:47
    ejsmith edited #471
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
stuff like avg:somefield min:somefield, max:somefield
that shouldn’t be specific
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
i know
but we need access to the elastic index for alias name
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
so what is specific?
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
can share my screen quick
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
what do you mean alias name
can’t do that.
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
No generic way to inject the index on the context unless we add a constraint to the index with a <T> for the hell of it to auto inject it
then the date stuff is not generic but something we’d have to ahve
that’s only for terms tho
Screen Shot 2016-04-11 at 4.12.07 PM.png
            .WithDateRange(utcStart, utcEnd, EventIndex.Fields.PersistentEvent.Date)
            .WithIndices(utcStart, utcEnd, $"'{_eventIndex.VersionedName}-'yyyyMM”); 
is the biggest thing
you want to do smart date ranges
Sander Rijken
@srijken
@niemyjski no ReaderWriterLock in PCL it seems, so just keep the lock the way it is?
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah I guess
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
that is up to the user to pass in a filter and system filter just like any other thing in the repo
aggregations are on top of that.
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
wonder if we can get away with non concurrent queues but is it worth it? what might it introduce
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
use the exact same query builder stuff
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah
ok
Sander Rijken
@srijken
and, how much do you think we gain?
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
so object query as first param
yeah good idea :)
@srijken I’m not sure if anything but less chances to dead lock???
between there lock implementations and ours but I don’t see how that would happen with our locks being around everything
see first answer
that kinda suggests that it is in PCL?
oh where’s there’s a bunch of platforms
just leave it
could try a normal queue, and see if the tests + your recent problem are still OK?
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
really hope the new TFM stuff will make this simpler.
Sander Rijken
@srijken
TFM?
is that missing an R in front? ;)
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
lol no
Target Framework Moniker
Sander Rijken
@srijken
right
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
the stuff where you target an API surface area and all platforms that support that contract or higher just wokr.
and you don’t have to do stuff for each platform
Sander Rijken
@srijken
@niemyjski merge conflict is fixed
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yay
feel free to merge it in
Sander Rijken
@srijken
can’t ;)
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
I’m fine either way no?
Sander Rijken
@srijken
ugh build error
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah
Sander Rijken
@srijken
it’s complaining about some reference. How can that be, I just changed one cs file