Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • Sep 22 01:09
    billgao87 starred exceptionless/Exceptionless
  • Sep 20 13:20

    niemyjski on elastic7

    Fixed more unit tests (compare)

  • Sep 20 12:11
    niemyjski commented #447
  • Sep 20 07:42
    ZhiqiangTao commented #447
  • Sep 19 22:56

    niemyjski on elastic7

    bumped major and deps (fixed te… (compare)

  • Sep 19 14:20

    niemyjski on elastic7

    Fixed all issues with the event… (compare)

  • Sep 19 07:04
  • Sep 19 04:49
  • Sep 19 03:32
  • Sep 18 12:46
    LydellM commented #448
  • Sep 18 12:38
    niemyjski labeled #448
  • Sep 18 12:37
    niemyjski closed #448
  • Sep 18 12:37
    niemyjski commented #448
  • Sep 18 12:37
    niemyjski commented #448
  • Sep 18 12:35
    niemyjski commented #447
  • Sep 18 07:09
    ZhiqiangTao closed #447
  • Sep 18 05:31
    leehomlee starred exceptionless/Exceptionless
  • Sep 18 03:17
  • Sep 18 02:13

    niemyjski on elastic7

    More ES7 Changes (compare)

  • Sep 17 20:34
    LydellM opened #448
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah good idea :)
@srijken I’m not sure if anything but less chances to dead lock???
between there lock implementations and ours but I don’t see how that would happen with our locks being around everything
see first answer
that kinda suggests that it is in PCL?
oh where’s there’s a bunch of platforms
just leave it
could try a normal queue, and see if the tests + your recent problem are still OK?
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
really hope the new TFM stuff will make this simpler.
Sander Rijken
@srijken
TFM?
is that missing an R in front? ;)
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
lol no
Target Framework Moniker
Sander Rijken
@srijken
right
Eric J. Smith
@ejsmith
the stuff where you target an API surface area and all platforms that support that contract or higher just wokr.
and you don’t have to do stuff for each platform
Sander Rijken
@srijken
@niemyjski merge conflict is fixed
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yay
feel free to merge it in
Sander Rijken
@srijken
can’t ;)
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
I’m fine either way no?
Sander Rijken
@srijken
ugh build error
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah
Sander Rijken
@srijken
it’s complaining about some reference. How can that be, I just changed one cs file
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
@srijken you have write access to that repo, do you not see any options to merge?
Sander Rijken
@srijken
yeah I do
can you kick that build off once again to see if that does anything?
exceptionless/Exceptionless.Net@85ee49c
can’t see how that can break anything
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah
kicking it off again
Sander Rijken
@srijken
fails again
been getting those type references for a while
Sander Rijken
@srijken
MSBuild version is now 14, last time it succeeded it was at 12
hmm
that’s MSBuild 12
and that’s like yesterday
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
I updated some dependencies to try and get benchmarks.net to run appears there is an issue with with there latest version
yeah what the hell
Sander Rijken
@srijken
C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\14.0\bin\Microsoft.Common.CurrentVersion.targets(1098,5): error MSB3644: The reference assemblies for framework ".NETFramework,Version=v4.5,Profile=Client" were not found. To resolve this, install t
he SDK or Targeting Pack for this framework version or retarget your application to a version of the framework for which you have the SDK or Targeting Pack installed. Note that assemblies will be resolved from the Global Assembly
Cache (GAC) and will be used in place of reference assemblies. Therefore your assembly may not be correctly targeted for the framework you intend.
but the build you just triggered when you did the hashcode changes on master is also MSBuild 14, and that one doesn’t have this error
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
yeah
I think I broke it
Sander Rijken
@srijken
how? :)
Blake Niemyjski
@niemyjski
idk
Sander Rijken
@srijken
so.. now what?