These are chat archives for fgpv-vpgf/rcs

29th
Jun 2018
James Rae
@james-rae
Jun 29 13:54

Joost logged an issue 3 weeks ago that got missed (I was away with germs, possibly heartbeat was also down?)
fgpv-vpgf/rcs#99

Barry and I are looking into it, but if anyone else has any insight, :thumbsup: :trophy:

Mike Weech
@mweech
Jun 29 14:37
fyi this is linked to CCCS work btw
Mike Weech
@mweech
Jun 29 14:43
have working entry for first one with an issue
needs to omit "recursive"
James Rae
@james-rae
Jun 29 14:46
@barryytm can you take a look at the code, see if recursive: false is bugged for WMS? If so can you create an issue for that?
Mike Weech
@mweech
Jun 29 14:47
recursive should really just be ignored in this case
if it doesnt apply, just drop it
or tight schema validation errors it out... but unless we give more detail about whats wrong its a bit unfriendluy
2nd issue is a false positive
works flawlessly for me.
likely a momentary server issue
James Rae
@james-rae
Jun 29 14:54

WMS layers cannot be added recursively

@barryytm can you verify, and if so, make an issue to update the service doc to remove recursive from the WMS contract: http://fgpv-vpgf.github.io/rcs/v3.0.0/service/contract.html#payload-type-ogc-wms

Barry Yung
@barryytm
Jun 29 14:56
Alright, I am still trying to fix my vagrant. Do you know a service with RCS v3.0.0 deployed?
James Rae
@james-rae
Jun 29 14:57
I believe http://section917.cloudapp.net:8000/static/test.html is v2.3.1. Which is what Joost thinks he is using so thats sorta useful
Mike Weech
@mweech
Jun 29 15:10
^ thats what i used for my two service tests
weird i am getting delayed 500 errors as well now
Barry Yung
@barryytm
Jun 29 15:13
I am getting the 500 error on the section917 service too.
However it worked when I tested it locally but my RCS was on v3.0.0 so I am trying to run v2.3.1 locally to see if it's a version problem.
Mike Weech
@mweech
Jun 29 15:36
it feels like some sort of time out issue given the lengthy delay