I'm trying to integrate the Nodle SDK into my flutter app, it says to configure my Class name in the AndroidManifest.xml (https://developer.nodle.com/nodle-sdk/)
<!-- Put your application class name below -->
<application
android:name="App">
</application>
whatever I put in there it says it can't find
This is how to implement BLoC with something you already know Notifier listeners https://fredgrott.medium.com/bloc-with-training-wheels-1ae977f0cb2f?sk=6242d6cd9b6d48121d578a8871d2d8f5
Hello! I have created another video about "Flutter Tutorial - Add Package From Pub.dev [2021] (http)" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tCgIwza9bU 
but animation is on par with the mobile platform
@RandalSchwartz what about the seo? I saw this package https://pub.dev/packages/seo_renderer but unsure if it is a good seo renderer
I hook in to the router, to populate the meta tags of the web page with unique information for that url
it seemed to work well, but I haven’t tested it yet.
as in the web page HTML was updated even before the first paint
thanks
A Video Player For Vimeo Videos in Flutter. This plugin allows us to play video from Vimeo and it supports Android and iOS platforms.https://github.com/Mindinventory/vimeo_video_player
Hello
I'm integrating mastercard payment gateway sdk in my project, this is the link
https://github.com/Mastercard-Gateway/gateway-android-sdk/wiki/3d-secure-authentication
I want to display 3-D Secure authentication screen but when the app launches it crash and the error it is displaying "java.lang.IllegalStateException: You need to use a Theme.AppCompat theme (or descendant) with this activity". I checked in stackoverflow but unfortunately no success.
Hi guys anyone I have this problem with Streams, I have 2 behaviorSubject one have an initialValue of N and the other one have sucesive values of N produced by a textField, I need to provide a new Stream<N> that returns initialValue until edited values arrives then it should emit only that values. I checked the rxdart docs but I couldn't found any function that could provide this result. Any idea would be helpful, thanks
Hi @RandalSchwartz thanks for your answer. I know that I could use yield to emit a new stream listen to one of the streams but in this case I need more to combine both streams but without the restrictions that both need to emit at least one value, because I need to emit initialValue until the other stream (edited value) emits, when that happens I need to emit the edited values instead
I was thinking that maybe MergeStream could do the trick I am testing that solution right now
But I am on mobile right now so it’s hard to type.
import 'dart:async';
final stream1 = Stream.periodic(Duration(seconds: 1), ((n) => (n)));
final stream2 = Stream.periodic(Duration(seconds: 1), ((n) => (n * 1000)));
main(List<String> arguments) async {
await for (var e in action()) {
print(e);
}
}
Stream<int> action() async* {
await for (var e in stream1) {
yield e;
if (e == 5) {
break;
}
}
yield* stream2;
}
that’ll do it
that prints 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1000 2000 ...
Oh, not quite what you wanted.
I guess you need to explain better.
...if the initialValue Stream only has one single event and then closes, then asyncExpand is also an option
Hi! I'm looking for more reading on the lint rule no_logic_in_create_state, the documentation I've found so far doesn't really explain why a StatefulWidget passing data to the State obj in createState is a bad idea.
In my use case, it allows me to provide initialization data for a field in State directly vs initializing in initState so the null checker can know its never null.
that’s the traditional response
this seems pretty clear! https://dart-lang.github.io/linter/lints/no_logic_in_create_state.html
Doing it in
initState means I either declare my field as nullable (which in practice its not, but dart doesn't know that), or just initialize the field with some arbitrary data so that I can leave it as non-null.
So that's what I was trying to do by passing state via a constructor argument, and the docs just say "using
widget.<field> is preferred so do it that way". So I was trying to understand why its not OK to do it via a constructor argument