{:.30s} will always trim the tail. adding the alignment operator just aligns the field after it's been trimmed {:>.30s}
fmt::print writes the whole message atomically (using one call to the underlying system function), which prevents mixing parts of messages within the process, but I'm not sure if it helps with multiple processes.
Hello, people. How is your day?
Can I get an aid with my problem? I want compile-time checks of parameters correctness (number of param mismatch etc.) with syntax like fmt::format("The answer is {:d}", "forty-two");. Is that possible? From website I only see alternative format(fmt kind of syntax that switches to compile time checks instead of throwing exceptions.
I tried DCMAKE_FMT_PEDANTIC=ONdidn't seem to help on both gcc and clang, probably it's doing not what I thought it would.
Reason to do this is to have compile-time checks for another library that uses fmt (named spdlog) while not changing anything on spdlog side...
I promise I did research myself prior to asking here, sorry for any trouble. I hope someone else had solution for this, spdlog seems to be quite popular and is mentioned in readme as a fellow library.
fmt (or FMT_STRING) macro as described in http://fmtlib.net/latest/api.html#compile-time-format-string-checks
Now it is all clear to me. Thank you again, Victor.
template <>
struct formatter<Polygon> {
template <typename ParseContext>
constexpr auto parse(ParseContext &ctx) { return ctx.begin(); }
template <typename FormatContext>
auto format(const Polygon &p,
FormatContext &ctx)
{
fmt::memory_buffer out;
bool is_first = true;
for (auto& vertice : p.vertices)
{
if(is_first)
{
format_to(out, "{}", vertice);
is_first = false;
}
else
{
format_to(out, ", {}", vertice);
}
}
return format_to(ctx.begin(), "{}", to_string(out));
}
};
}
So something like:
template <typename FormatContext>
auto format(const Polygon &p,
FormatContext &ctx)
{
//fmt::memory_buffer out;
bool is_first = true;
for (auto& vertice : p.vertices)
{
if(is_first)
{
format_to(ctx.begin(), "{}", vertice);
is_first = false;
}
else
{
format_to(ctx.begin(), ", {}", vertice);
}
}
return ctx.begin();
}Seems much better. Thanks!
So something like
template <typename FormatContext>
auto format(const :Polygon &p,
FormatContext &ctx)
{
bool is_first = true;
for (auto& vertice : p.vertices)
{
if(is_first)
{
format_to(ctx.begin(), "{}", vertice);
is_first = false;
}
else
{
format_to(ctx.begin(), ", {}", vertice);
}
}
return ctx.begin();
}seems much better. Thanks!
format_to and use out() instead of begin() (the latter is deprecated): template <typename FormatContext>
auto format(const :Polygon &p,
FormatContext &ctx)
{
bool is_first = true;
auto out = ctx.out();
for (auto& vertice : p.vertices)
{
if(is_first)
{
out = format_to(out, "{}", vertice);
is_first = false;
}
else
{
out = format_to(out, ", {}", vertice);
}
}
return out;
}
hello i tested fmt::snprintf on vs 2017 like this:
The first one does only remove %s and %d resulting in
hallo mein name ist : und ich bin jahre altÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌÌ
The other two replace the format specifier correctly with their value.
Also neither of them does a null termination?
Am i missing something ? shouldnt fmt::snprintf work exactly like std::snprintf?
MachineInstr. I am receiving this error (since I'm using C++11): function uses ‘auto’ type specifier without trailing return type. Which return type should I put instead of auto?
template <> struct fmt::formatter<llvm::MachineInstr> {
template <typename ParseContext> constexpr auto parse(ParseContext &ctx) {
return ctx.begin();
}
template <typename FormatContext>
auto format(const llvm::MachineInstr &MI, FormatContext &ctx) {
return fmt::format_to(ctx.begin(), "{}", to_string(MI));
}
};
fmt::print("{}", str); or fmt::print(str);. For example: Print("({:.1f}, {:.1f})"); works, but it could be a hack as this is not explicitly documented. Furthermore, if both are valid, which one is the most performant and thus recommended?