Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Jan 31 2019 14:55
    theopenlab-ci[bot] commented #488
  • Jan 31 2019 14:46
    vadimstroganov starred fog/fog-openstack
  • Jan 31 2019 14:41
    vadimstroganov commented #487
  • Jan 31 2019 14:40
    vadimstroganov commented #487
  • Jan 31 2019 14:38
    vadimstroganov opened #488
  • Jan 31 2019 14:33
  • Jan 31 2019 12:24
    vadimstroganov opened #487
  • Jan 31 2019 09:36
    aufi labeled #486
  • Jan 31 2019 09:35

    aufi on master

    Created explicit mock and real … Merge pull request #486 from gi… (compare)

  • Jan 31 2019 09:35
    aufi closed #486
  • Jan 30 2019 16:38
    gildub closed #482
  • Jan 30 2019 16:38

    gildub on master

    Add multiattach parameter to vo… Merge pull request #482 from ma… (compare)

  • Jan 30 2019 16:38
    gildub commented #482
  • Jan 30 2019 16:23
    theopenlab-ci[bot] commented #486
  • Jan 30 2019 16:07
    gildub synchronize #486
  • Jan 30 2019 15:54
    gildub review_requested #486
  • Jan 30 2019 15:53
    gildub opened #486
  • Jan 30 2019 15:22

    gildub on master

    Fixed a couple of path to clear… Merge pull request #485 from gi… (compare)

  • Jan 30 2019 15:22
    gildub closed #485
  • Jan 30 2019 12:06
ioggstream
@ioggstream
1- remove the whitespace check
2- stick with URI.encode(URI.decode(
Bill Wei
@bzwei
or simply do like @Fryguy said search/replace
ioggstream
@ioggstream
@bzwei ok for me
:D
ioggstream
@ioggstream
ok, pushing...
ioggstream
@ioggstream
I wrote a small docker-compose for developing fog-openstack
it's useful to test with different ruby versions
is it worth to be added to the project?
Bill Wei
@bzwei
@ioggstream I approved it. Thanks!
ioggstream
@ioggstream
@bzwei Great! :DDDDD
Thank you very much1
!
@bzwei should we get in touch with @Ladas or @seanhandley for the merge?
Bill Wei
@bzwei
yes
ioggstream
@ioggstream
Let me know if I should rebase everything in a single patch or if some sort of history is needed
Bill Wei
@bzwei
I think it is good to rebase because many of the commits were temporary and got overriden with later commits. You may decide to have a few meaningful commits rather than a big one.
ioggstream
@ioggstream
@bzwei @Ladas @seanhandley rebased with 6 commits. Let me know pls!
Ladislav Smola
@Ladas
@ioggstream merged
ioggstream
@ioggstream
@Ladas thx for the merge!
Divya K Konoor
@dikonoor
Hi , As per https://github.com/fog/fog-openstack/blob/master/supported.md, the highest supported version of cinder is v2 (even though the current version of cinder is v3) and the highest version of nova is v2, even though v2.1 is the current in community. Are there any plans to upgrade the support to the latest/current ones ?
ioggstream
@ioggstream
@dikonoor I think we should update the v. There are features in microversions that are very useful like soft-anti-affinity...
Divya K Konoor
@dikonoor
@ioggstream Perhaps I should could open a bug so that it gets attention
ioggstream
@ioggstream
@dikonoor you should open a bug explaining how to riproduce the issue
did you wrote a patch?
Divya K Konoor
@dikonoor
@ioggstream :) well..there are no specific scenarios I have tried yet to be able to reproduce an issue as such but the versions mentioned in that support.cmd obviusly looks outdated. Also, I am still a MIQ end user / operator at this point. Haven't got my hands dirty yet
ioggstream
@ioggstream
@dikonoor is there a BZ or support case related?
I saw a related PR fog/fog-openstack#339
Divya K Konoor
@dikonoor
@ioggstream Not yet..it was a general observation ..
But I will watch out for use cases
ioggstream
@ioggstream
check that PR as it sets the supported_microversion
Divya K Konoor
@dikonoor
ok..Will check it out
ioggstream
@ioggstream
and open an issue so that people can understand better your suggetsion
Divya K Konoor
@dikonoor
yeah..Got it
ioggstream
@ioggstream
anybody's going to review this fog/fog-openstack#318 ?
it's good for me
EvanYang
@YaEvan
When I installed the pike version of openstack with devstack, the glance was version v2.8. I make the Fog::Image::OpenStack.new() failure.Is it because the highest only support to 2.3? How do I get it to support 2.8?Thank you very much. #342
Marco Voelz
@voelzmo
Hello friends of the ruby-managed openstack
Can we get fog/fog-openstack#340 merged and a release including that? We're currently packaging our fork of the gem just because of this and I'd like to change that :)
Marco Voelz
@voelzmo
Hey @gildub any chance to get a release including fog/fog-openstack#340? Also, not sure how to proceed with fog/fog-openstack#345 I've just opened it for not losing context
markliao
@liaodalin19903
who can help me with this, friends?
markliao
@liaodalin19903
who know this issue?
oblutak
@oblutak
Anyone aware of fog-core 2.0.0 change that breaks fog-openstack?
I never work with fog directly. Encounter the issue using test-kitchen, which is using kitchen-openstack. I have force via my gem file to have fog-core <2.0.0 and I don't see the issue. otherwise test-kitchen fails with
D      ----End Backtrace-----
D      -Composite Exception--
D      Class: Kitchen::ActionFailed
D      Message: Failed to complete #create action: [undefined method `each_pair' for "  <Fog::Compute::OpenStack::Metadata\n    [\n          \n    ]\n  >":Fog::Compute::OpenStack::Metadata
Did you mean?  each_slice]
oblutak
@oblutak
I see the travis build with similar error, so I guess someone will have a look and fix
zz9pzza
@zz9pzza
+1 on the fog-core 2.0.0 change