psanders on v2
Refactored (compare)
psanders on v2
Cleanup WIP on route manager (compare)
psanders on v2
Fixed test Added additional unit tests (compare)
psanders on v2
Adding devcontainer config Fixed not forwarding bye messag… (compare)
psanders on v2
Set debug as the default loggin… Updated types Fixed missing parameter and 12 more (compare)
psanders on v2
Implements forward authenticati… Added example resources WIP APIServer implementation and 1 more (compare)
psanders on v2
WIP implementing connect proces… (compare)
psanders on v2
Adding request methods WIP implementing connect proces… (compare)
github-actions[bot] on 1.0.3
psanders on master
Reduces provisioning time Fixed registration gap Merge pull request #130 from fo… (compare)
psanders on npm_and_yarn
psanders
(edited) ... host -> sip provider
.(Verify your network status)tells me that Routr can't connect to the endpoint at the transport level. I have seem in the past issue with firewalls or dns, but it is obviously not your case. => ... host -> sip provider.(Verify your network status)
tells me that Routr can't connect to the endpoint at the transport level. I have seen in the past issue with firewalls or DNS, but that can't be your issue because your other apps work fine.
markcs
yes, it is weird.
psanders
To add to the mystery, I'm having problems proving port 5060 for the providers you are having issues with.
markcs
okay, this is strange. I did a subdomain search for localphone.com and found gateway.localphone.com and I managed to get this to register now
psanders
I can give it a shot. But I'm doing a simple telnet <http://localphone.com|localphone.com> 5060
markcs
Is there some mangling of domain names you're doing that expect the host in the format xxx.yyy.zzz ? The ones that failed for me did not have that format
psanders
Are you in Ubuntu?
markcs
I am
psanders
Try this telnet <http://localphone.com|localphone.com> 5060
psanders
Tell me what you see
psanders
Also try telnet <http://sip.linphone.org|sip.linphone.org> 5060
markcs
telnet to what? localhost or where?
psanders
Does it give you different results?
psanders
telnet http://localphone.com|localphone.com 5060
psanders
and telnet http://sip.linphone.org|sip.linphone.org 5060
psanders
to localphone[.]com and port 5060
psanders
and to sip.linphone[.]org and port 5060
markcs
telnet'ing just hangs for those
markcs
however, telnet'ing to gateway.localphone.com connects
markcs
linphone always works for me too
markcs
but sip2sip.info requires a outbound proxy which is not yet supported
psanders
Ok. I get connection refused for sip2sip[dot]info
markcs
I don't understand how this can be a firewall as I don't have any active. Check out http://telnet-online.net and you'll see the same issues
markcs
# telnet localphone.com 5060
Connection to localphone.com:5060 - fail
Error #110 (Connection timed out)
Connection to sip.linphone.org:5060 - ok
psanders
You are correct. I'm seen the same.
markcs
that actually makes me happy! 🙂 Glad it wasn't just me
psanders
Hehehe
psanders
I've never seen this behavior. It doesn't sense that your softphone works.
markcs
I wondered the host was expected to be in the format xxx.yyy.zzz ? All those that fail have either yyy.zzz or www.xxx.yyy.zzz format
psanders
But there is no restriction on the format of the hostname.
markcs
okay. rule that out then
markcs
that worked I realised today. I think I wrote that above. But they don't advertise that as an address to register to, I was just testing
psanders
Ok
_slack_fonoster_US6477RD4
[fonoster/routr] <https://github.com/fonoster/routr/compare/eb9e45f04402...947510cd7fcf|1 new commit> pushed to https://github.com/fonoster/routr/tree/master|`master`
_slack_fonoster_US6477RD4
[fonoster/routr] <https://github.com/fonoster/routr/compare/947510cd7fcf...a8ecd41a13a5|1 new commit> pushed to https://github.com/fonoster/routr/tree/master|`master`