by

Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
  • Jul 14 05:44
    BLasan commented #1472
  • Jul 13 19:10

    Orbiter on dev-dist

    wqadded ssi (compare)

  • Jul 13 02:58

    norbusan on development

    add icon specification to deskt… (compare)

  • Jul 12 15:07

    Orbiter on dev-dist

    wqadded ssi (compare)

  • Jul 12 10:17

    Orbiter on dev-dist

    wqadded ssi (compare)

  • Jul 09 03:02

    norbusan on dev-dist

    wqadded ssi (compare)

  • Jul 04 23:05
    jaymeanchante opened #1472
  • Jun 28 09:52

    Orbiter on dev-dist

    wqadded ssi (compare)

  • Jun 27 10:38

    Orbiter on development

    fixed youtube search the youtub… (compare)

  • Jun 19 03:31
    viditvarshney commented #1452
  • Jun 19 03:31
    viditvarshney commented #1452
  • Jun 18 09:09
    viditvarshney commented #1452
  • Jun 18 09:09
    viditvarshney commented #1452
  • Jun 17 21:27

    Orbiter on development

    generalized unify method call next step towards backtracking:… (compare)

  • Jun 17 07:07

    Orbiter on development

    fix for missing instantiations (compare)

  • Jun 16 22:30
    Trimankaur commented #1452
  • Jun 16 21:28

    Orbiter on development

    simplifying unify call (compare)

  • Jun 16 21:18

    Orbiter on development

    working on unify towards full p… (compare)

  • Jun 16 19:03

    Orbiter on development

    refactoring towards backtrackin… (compare)

  • Jun 14 16:39

    Orbiter on dev-dist

    added ssi (compare)

Mario Behling
@mariobehling

@Orbiter

I removed the submodule! No more submodules!

Cool!

aryanguls
@aryanguls
Nishith P
@NishithP2004
This message was deleted
Siddharth Sinha
@Sid911
@NishithP2004 I think he said that before mario sir said something
aryanguls
@aryanguls
Yep i had sent it before that.
Must have forgotten to delete it
Michael Christen
@Orbiter
@Sid911 does ./gradlew assemble work?
Siddharth Sinha
@Sid911
@Orbiter I think it does.. let me check
checking
image.png
it does work @Orbiter
let me just give the versions of java and gradle that I am using
Gradle 6.0.1
root@sid:/home/susi_server# java --version
openjdk 11.0.5 2019-10-15
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.5+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.118.04)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 11.0.5+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.118.04, mixed mode, sharing)
aryanguls
@aryanguls
fossasia/susi.ai#3341 Someone please review this and accept this merge request.
Michael Christen
@Orbiter
cool
EdwardCullen30
@EdwardCullen30
is this project up for gsoc 2020 ?
Norbert Preining
@norbusan
GSoC projects are not decided by now, but we hope so.
A.Dilshaad
@Dilshaad21
@norbusan @Orbiter @akshatnitd please review the changes fossasia/susi_server#1451
A.Dilshaad
@Dilshaad21
@Orbiter please review fossasia/susi_server#1456
Michael Christen
@Orbiter
@Dilshaad21 done
A.Dilshaad
@Dilshaad21
Great! Now users will have access to delete their skills after merging fossasia/susi.ai#3462 in the webclient
Muhammad Wasif
@MuhammadWasif
Wow.....That's really great 👍
Michael Christen
@Orbiter
Yeah maybe that reduces the number of bad skills. People are testing skills and are not able to remove their tests afterwards.
A.Dilshaad
@Dilshaad21
:+1:
A.Dilshaad
@Dilshaad21
@Orbiter there has been an issue in storing user's bots as drafts fossasia/susi_server#1457. It kept giving server error
object parser error: Unterminated string at 313 [character 314 line 1]
A.Dilshaad
@Dilshaad21
Mario Behling
@mariobehling

FOSSASIA Confirms Summit from March 19-21 + #DevSprints on March 22 at Lifelong Learning Institute #Singapore after meetings about measures ensuring health and safety https://twitter.com/fossasiasg/status/1229692817867325440

Aman Rajput
@asraman9792
Hello everyone I am Aman Singh Rajput 3rd Year Electrical engineering from IIT BHU VARANASI . I want to get started for GSOC 2020 So i want to contribute to your organisation. I have experience in Core JAVA and Software Development in JAVA. So anyone please help me to get started .
Dandamudi Rohit
@diru1100
@asraman9792
FOSSASIA isn't participating in GsoC 2020, feel free to go through ReadMe and best practices if you still want to contribute.
Ceeee
@Ceeee
Hi room. My build fails with "29 tests completed, 1 failed" ("ai.susi.mind.SusiTutorialTest > test FAILED"). Did I miss a dependency here? Working on Ubuntu 18.04
Mario Behling
@mariobehling
@/all Dear friends, despite challenges we are happy to work with the community to share live streams from the FOSSASIA Summit "social distancing event" and include remote speakers and participation. An overview of streams is here: https://www.youtube.com/fossasiaorg
The complete schedule of the event is here: https://summit.fossasia.org/event/schedule.html
Mario Behling
@mariobehling
@Orbiter Anything to test for us please let us know when ready.
Norbert Preining
@norbusan
@mariobehling at least deepspeech seems to get better, I have committed a fix today
Mario Behling
@mariobehling
:thumbsup:
Ashwani Gupta
@ashwani99
Hi all I want to setup susi server in my local, I am following steps in README. But my grade build is failing
java.lang.AssertionError: does not exist: /home/ashwani/Documents/github/susi_server_https/data/generic_skills/media_discovery at ai.susi.mind.SusiMind$Layer.<init>(SusiMind.java:83) at ai.susi.DAO.init(DAO.java:381) at ai.susi.mind.SusiTutorialTest.test(SusiTutorialTest.java:86) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103) at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27) at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
Am I missing something?
ayush raj
@llucifer97
Hi I am ayush and excited to contribute to this project.I have some experience with flask and django and bit of javascript.Can u please guide me to first steps on how to start contribute.
I see some issues on github,should i start with that?
TOYLOPEZ
@Juvla
since i started join github i dont know how to start building a bot for line apps,botkick which i am badky needed to my room.
is there anyone here help to have a kickbot for nukers?
Sarthak Handa
@sarthakhanda
greetings to all, I'm having a hard time understanding the code base and setting up the work environment at my local. I'm a beginner, can anyone help me overcome the above problems/lack of knowledge?
Mario Behling
@mariobehling
@iamareebjamal There was a discussion about you recent merged PR. There are a lot of files changed. And, it is unclear if all changes are relevant to the issue. With so many file changes, the reviews will take more time. So, I dont know. Maybe the PR needs to be reverted and go back into a review stage? @norbusan @Orbiter What are the next steps?
Mario Behling
@mariobehling
@iamareebjamal So, we had a conversation in the weekly meeting and @Orbiter said that he will look through the changes.
Areeb Jamal
@iamareebjamal
The changes are relevant to reduce duplication and reduce a security issue to a single function and mitigate that. If reverted, the code will be vulnerable again, and the number of file changes were necessary because the same vulnerable chunk of code was copied in every file. For instance, there were 120 references of the security issue solved in the PR, work on which is going on since 10th March(since 2 months ago)
Norbert Preining
@norbusan
@iamareebjamal First of all thanks for your work on that issue!!! Nobody doubts the usefulness and importance of the changes, but think in maintainance terms - if something is broken now, we can hardly find the reason for it in a specific commit (that is no git bisect etc) due to lumping too many things together. git commits are best when they have a clear target, and only the necessary changes. Reformatting without function changes can be put into a separate commit.
Areeb Jamal
@iamareebjamal
Hi, I can't recall where I reformatted the files without function changes, and I have already put in unit tests to prove that not only my changes don't break the current system, but even that they are working correctly with previous behavior as there were no unit tests before which tested the skill loading and metadata, so in a way, we could conclude that there was no way previously to know if the system works without manually checking it, but now we do as now I have written tests for DAOFileAccess, SkillQueryParser, SkillQuery and every class I have added. If someone can show me the changes where I have just changed the formatting without functional changes and have not added tests for the function, I would be happy to oblige and either add tests for the same or revert it. I follow the rule of no reformatting without necessary changes quite strictly myself and have made as minimal as possible changes to ensure that the vulnerability is removed and system remains testable. The only changes I made which weren't related to the vulnerability were which broke the system on testing, for example, in SusiUtterance, the server crashed with error 500 when parsing a skill with just a "?" with IndexOutofBoundException because it didn't test for string being empty before accessing the first character, I fixed that and also added a test to ensure it parses such files correctly, so I am confident that more bugs are even fixed in the commits and tests have been added to prove that. However, I have split the changes into multiple atomic commits so it remains easy to git bisect and find where the bug is and if there are some changes someone feels unrelated to the PR or entirely cosmetic, I will be more than happy to add tests to prove they don't break and maybe even fix the system, or revert them :)
Thanks