Where communities thrive

Join over 1.5M+ people
Join over 100K+ communities
Free without limits
Create your own community

Explore more communities

fponticelli/thx.core

Core features for the thx library

People

Repo info

Activity

Mar 19 03:14

MasterEric opened #9
Feb 22 12:24

RealyUniqueName commented #114
Feb 21 07:22

acarioni commented #114
Feb 20 11:02

RealyUniqueName commented #114
Feb 20 11:00

RealyUniqueName labeled #114
Feb 20 10:59

RealyUniqueName commented #114
Feb 14 08:18

acarioni opened #114
Jan 19 04:30

RealyUniqueName on master

Add execution time (#113) * ad… (compare)
Jan 19 04:30

RealyUniqueName closed #113
Jan 18 21:41

AlexHaxe opened #113
Jan 17 00:18

fponticelli on master

Fix thx.Set#toString type confu… Merge pull request #278 from xu… (compare)
Jan 17 00:18

fponticelli closed #278
Jan 16 21:45

xunto edited #278
Jan 16 21:44

xunto opened #278
Jan 15 23:35

fponticelli on master

Fix wrong sign in DateTime#subt… Add tests. Merge pull request #277 from xu… (compare)
Jan 15 23:35

fponticelli closed #277
Jan 15 23:35

fponticelli commented #277
Jan 15 21:35

xunto commented #277
Jan 15 21:35

xunto commented #277
Jan 15 21:23

xunto synchronize #277

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

it looks right to me

postite

@postite

why would i get 5,8 min and not something like 5,5 min at least some decimal that wouldn't get over the 60 secs in a minutes

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

because it is a decimal representation ... it doesn't get over 60secs

you are probably looking for something like this: trace(sec.toTime());

postite

@postite

oh yeah ! exactly ! thx a lot !

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

no problem

ousado

@ousado

@fponticelli method apply has not been correctly migrated to ddbmviz.web.VizC - what does that mean?

(giving doom a shot)

ousado

@ousado

oh, I see - there was an update function that was called too early

ousado

@ousado

@fponticelli http://ousado.github.io/bench/ - made with thx.*/doom :)

(just a proof of concept so far)

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

that's great!

how do you like it so far?

ousado

@ousado

it's good - but I'm not really happy with the syntactical overhead - I have a similar thing that's way lighter in that regard

it uses macros, though, so there are different trade-offs

what I do is div( id=this, title=that, a(href=foo), ... )

and it doesn't use a virtual dom, it generates a binary representation instead, so it's not exactly comparable

but I'm thinking of writing a doom-backend for the syntax

ousado

@ousado

also I have some other things in there that you might be interested in for doom

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

contributions are always welcome :)

ousado

@ousado

@fponticelli HaxeFoundation/haxe-evolution#8 maybe +1 that :)

or write a pamphlet :)

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

I feel like the more I say, the more Nicolas react in a bad way to it

I gave my +1 ... I am not sure I should write anything

ousado

@ousado

sounds good - I'm not sure about the course of action there, either..

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

ousado

@ousado

but he's following the discussion it seems

(at least he's online)

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

we can hope

ousado

@ousado

and hasn't objected so far

I mean, it's pretty trivial

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

it is on every possible meaning

ousado

@ousado

I just fixed some more stuff

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

I am not sure what is the deal with the explicit return type but I will let that to you :)

ousado

@ousado

https://gist.github.com/ousado/6ab6664144dabe87c66156735920156f

all this works now

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

that looks really great

ousado

@ousado

yeah.. and frankly, the change is so small

if he comes with his veto again, I seriously consider a fork

this is only on syntax level, no semantics touched

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

this is really impressive: var ff = a -> b -> b*a;

ousado

@ousado

not even a new AST node or anything

yeah, I think it's kind of beautiful :)

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

it really is

ousado

@ousado

seeing it in haxe now, I like it even better than =>

Franco Ponticelli

@fponticelli

it is consistent with the type system, which is great

it took me a while to get used to the lean arrow but I like it now :)

ousado

@ousado

hehe, yeah

and with haskell and ocaml we're in good company there