These are chat archives for frictionlessdata/chat

1st
Dec 2016
Rufus Pollock
@rufuspollock
Dec 01 2016 09:05
@pdehaye i think this is the wrong channel - please use okfn/chat ;-)
pdehaye
@pdehaye
Dec 01 2016 09:06
@rgrp sorry, got confused
Rufus Pollock
@rufuspollock
Dec 01 2016 09:35
@danfowler any update on frictionlessdata/specs#322
@danfowler @pwalsh did we open an issue about need for a profiles registry (and why the schemas repo probably is not the place) based on our discussion last meeting? I can’t find it atm ...
Yuri Astrakhan
@nyurik
Dec 01 2016 15:44
@rgrp any thoughts about my comment above?
Dominik Moritz
@domoritz
Dec 01 2016 16:01
Are we meeting now?
Rufus Pollock
@rufuspollock
Dec 01 2016 16:04
@domoritz yes we are ...
Dominik Moritz
@domoritz
Dec 01 2016 16:05
@rgrp can you send me a link?
@nyurik you are welcome to join the hangout if you want to ...
roll
@roll
Dec 01 2016 17:09
@rgrp @pwalsh WDYT of changing specs repo via PRs? It will allow to review new changes by working group and community. In PR comment working group could be pinged e.g.
Rufus Pollock
@rufuspollock
Dec 01 2016 17:28
@roll i would usually do this. The last week i’ve pushed directly because a) we’d discussed the proposed changes at length and had language proposals for the complex ones in issues b) people were away and i did not want too many interdependent proposals stacking up (e.g. the multiple parts proposal dependin on url + path merge)
@roll generally going forward we can do PR ...
Yuri Astrakhan
@nyurik
Dec 01 2016 17:46
@rgrp sorry, just saw it. Let me know if you have any comments about https://github.com/frictionlessdata/specs/issues/265#issuecomment-264024229
Rufus Pollock
@rufuspollock
Dec 01 2016 17:47
@nyurik commenting now - if you are around later for a chat - i’m around. 15m a call may be worth multiples of that in issue comments :-)
roll
@roll
Dec 01 2016 18:42
@rgrp great, thanks
Yuri Astrakhan
@nyurik
Dec 01 2016 18:52
@rgrp I'm here, can chat for a bit, but have something in half an hour
Rufus Pollock
@rufuspollock
Dec 01 2016 18:54
@nyurik pinging you right now privately with a chat channel
Yuri Astrakhan
@nyurik
Dec 01 2016 19:28
@rgrp did you see the "sources" field in the help page? For us it will be a wiki markup field, where users will be able to write any kind of text about the origin of the data
Rufus Pollock
@rufuspollock
Dec 01 2016 19:28
ah - we have sources too - and they can use any kind of markup ther
i’ll make a comment
Yuri Astrakhan
@nyurik
Dec 01 2016 19:29
@rgrp "sources" or "source" ?
Rufus Pollock
@rufuspollock
Dec 01 2016 19:29
sources
Rufus Pollock
@rufuspollock
Dec 01 2016 19:37
you can have multiple - you might have pulled data from several places. But you can also have just one entry ...