These are chat archives for frictionlessdata/chat

31st
Jan 2019
Tim Wisniewski
@timwis
Jan 31 09:59
Sure @rufuspollock! I've shot you a DM
Michael Joseph Rosenthal
@micimize
Jan 31 18:45
has there been any work done on package-of-package standards? Like, a package where the resources are all datapackages
Rufus Pollock
@rufuspollock
Jan 31 18:47
@micimize old proposal was like this - frictionlessdata/specs#37 I agree that a data package version might be interesting or a data package whose resource is a CSV of that structure.
Michael Joseph Rosenthal
@micimize
Jan 31 18:50
@rufuspollock sweet - yeah, I think between document resources (json) and data package resources, the frictionless spec would be able to represent any data topology
like, I'm currently dealing with a system where the topology is roughly:
batch:
  - metadata.json
  - user_packages[]:
     { metadata, relation_a, relation_b }
Rufus Pollock
@rufuspollock
Jan 31 19:00
ok, please add a comment to that issue on your proposal and we can make it into a pattern.
Michael Joseph Rosenthal
@micimize
Jan 31 19:03
:thumbsup: I'll read through the prior discussion and think about it a bit more deeply beforehand