Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    it is probably a bug
    Ryan Proud
    @spry-rproud
    @fwbrasil Any reason why the following wouldn't work? It runs without error but "bar" gets set to foo.id instead of BAR-${foo.id}.
    customScript {
      update {
        (foo: Foo) => where() set (foo.bar := s"BAR-${foo.id}")
      }
    }
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    @spry-rproud i can't see why it wouldn’t work
    Clayton Silva
    @claytonsilva
    hi everyone
    someone need to create "fat-jar" to run activate task ?
    i get this error ava.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid entity class class net.fwbrasil.activate.migration.StorageVersion.
    java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid entity class class net.fwbrasil.activate.migration.StorageVersion.
    Pawel
    @odwrotnie
    how do you count the results in query?
    Smirnov Ivan
    @StopKran
    Hi there. Does anyone use Activate in production, and what are your impressions of it? Activate looks very good, but for me it is little scared to use it. What about perspectives of the project? And what about documentation? Site tells, that last release is 1.6, but i found 1.7 in maven repository http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/net/fwbrasil/activate-core_2.11/1.7/ - what is it? Should it works with scala 2.11.2 and play framework 2.3.8?
    Ryan Proud
    @spry-rproud
    @fwbrasil Just checking in on the status of activate. Is this going to see any more active development?
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    hi @spry-rproud, I’m planning to work on a 2.0 release still this year
    is there something blocking you currently?
    Ryan Proud
    @spry-rproud
    Nothing, currently blocking. Just a few work arounds that are not ideal that we would like to iron out.
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    i see
    I’m working on a new query lib to integrate with Activate
    the built-in query mecheanism is limited
    and I had too many problems using Slick queries
    @spry-rproud what query mechanism do you use?
    activate queries or slick?
    Ryan Proud
    @spry-rproud
    Once you start to map out 2.0, let me know and I'll see if I can help out at all. Ok, will there be any support for postgresql json? We're using a mixture of activate queries and slick queries with slick-pg tacked on.
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    will do, my plan is release quill mid-september and start working on 2.0
    it’ll be nice to have your input
    Ryan Proud
    @spry-rproud
    Ok, sounds good.
    Michael Murray
    @murz
    FYI I think http://activate-framework.org/ is down. I'm being served an error: Error establishing a database connection
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    thansk for reporting @murz, I’m going to check it out in the evening
    Nykolas Laurentino de Lima
    @nykolaslima
    Does activate jdbc-async support scala 2.11?
    Nykolas Laurentino de Lima
    @nykolaslima
    @fwbrasil I saw that the last commit on activate was on October...Are you still evolving the framework?
    I'm making some research about Activate vs Slick
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    @nykolaslima I have plans to work on a new Activate version that features an integration with http://getquill.io, but I think it won’t happen before the 1.0 release of Quill in the next months
    note that Activate has a much higher abstraction level than Quill and Slick, so a comparison is not trivial
    Nykolas Laurentino de Lima
    @nykolaslima
    Should I use quill instead of activate?
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    it depends on what you want to do and the abstraction level that you like to work with
    Nykolas Laurentino de Lima
    @nykolaslima
    activate works like a high level quill version?
    sorry about my questions, I'm really new to Scala and those frameworks
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    the main difference is: activate is modeled for rich domain models with simple database interaction, while quill is modeled for simple domain models with rich database interaction
    Nykolas Laurentino de Lima
    @nykolaslima
    haha, nice explanation, thank you very much
    I have a real simple database interaction, so I believe activate will fit better
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    in the future, an integration with Quill would bring the best of both worlds
    Nykolas Laurentino de Lima
    @nykolaslima
    If I want to execute some complex query, with specific database functions, is it possible with activate? @fwbrasil
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    it should be possible through a Slick query or plain sql
    (activate has an integration with Slick)
    Nykolas Laurentino de Lima
    @nykolaslima
    nice!
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    btw, this is the kind of thing that I call “rich database interaction” :)
    Nykolas Laurentino de Lima
    @nykolaslima
    I think I would give a try to activate :D
    yeah, but I believe that it gonna be an exceptional case in this application
    Flavio W. Brasil
    @fwbrasil
    I see, makes sense then
    Nykolas Laurentino de Lima
    @nykolaslima
    You, as an experienced programmer, what do you think about Finatra
    We already have some projects using it and I'm thinking about using it...have you ever had some experience with it?