Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Activity
    Nolan Woods
    @innovate-invent
    :smile:
    Dave Clements
    @tnabtaf
    Thanks @innovate-invent ! I knew that would be a useful papercuts call. :-)
    And bravo on the issue number too
    selten
    @selten
    @innovate-invent with replacing the loc files, do you mean the data table data?
    Nolan Woods
    @innovate-invent
    @selten yes
    selten
    @selten
    @innovate-invent I have already worked on getting that one sorted (albeit for a different reason) and will continue with the suggestions soon, so that one is already being taken care of (galaxyproject/galaxy#9875). I'm currently waiting for a proper development laptop to arrive so I can continue working on it.
    Nolan Woods
    @innovate-invent
    @selten excellent! thanks
    do you mind linking that in the issue?
    others are also interested in following the progress
    selten
    @selten
    I did
    @innovate-invent I'll let you know when the PR is done, I hope to have it in the 21.05 release
    Nolan Woods
    @innovate-invent
    brilliant! :thumbsup:
    pvanheus
    @pvanheus
    as a usability tweak... when I search for a dataset in the multi-history view, I would like to only see those histories where the search has a hit, rather than see a whole lot of empty histories that I need to scroll though. I think this might be a not-too-hard thing to tackled, but can someone point me to where to start in the code?
    Nolan Woods
    @innovate-invent
    @pvanheus that is likely a @nerdinacan question. He is in the process of rewriting the history view and may have already addressed this.
    Mason
    @Nerdinacan
    @pvanheus I haven't actually built the multi-history view yet, but you could try mounting the History/HistoryPanel multiple times. The intent was to separate a history component from the fact that the history being shown is "the current one" so we should be about ready to try and build that view.
    As for finding histories that contain a text-match of a contained dataset, that is likely going to require a separate search ajax call which youwould use to determine which histories to try to render. That roughly the functionality you're looking for?
    At any particular time a history component doesn't necessarily know the entire contents of all its datasets, because that could be a whole lot of datasets. So you will need to do that filter you described first, then render any matching histories in a loop.
    Mason
    @Nerdinacan
    You could, however, search the local cache for all datasets matching your criteria, then get a unique set of histories. This will only work on data that has already been cached. This might be an acceptable "loading state" while your main query goes and gets an exact answer.
    pvanheus
    @pvanheus
    thanks, @Nerdinacan. where in the codebase is this stuff?
    Mason
    @Nerdinacan
    @pvanheus The beta history component is in client/src/components/History, although a somewhat cleaner version is just about to hit dev (galaxyproject/galaxy#10971)
    You would probably be interested in the HistoryPanel component. Probably you'd do some kind of history query/filter with the ajax call I mentioned, then try to loop over the results and render a HistoryPanel with each history object? I genuinely haven't tried it yet though
    pvanheus
    @pvanheus
    I'll have a poke at it thanks...
    I use Galaxy with IRIDA quite a bit and IRIDA has a way of making many histories... thus the interest.
    Mason
    @Nerdinacan
    awesome let me know how it flies, again, I'm still trying to get that component happy before I start slapping more on the page. :)
    Jennifer Hillman-Jackson
    @jennaj
    Hi! This is a question from Jochen @bimbam23 --problems using cvmfs with version 16.07 (!!) https://help.galaxyproject.org/t/toolshed-not-working-anymore-with-old-galaxy/5302 He exhausted the existing solutions (reset/allow cookies) except for upgrading (can't rn). Any other advice?
    Nicola Soranzo
    @nsoranzo
    Upgrade! Pretty sure this has been fixed in some recent release.
    dannon
    @dannon:matrix.org
    [m]
    I know that's an old release, but if this was working and we just broke it with the update we should address that
    Jochen Bick
    @bimbam23
    Hej thanks for having a look into that issue :-)
    wm75 (Wolfgang Maier)
    @wm75:matrix.org
    [m]
    Does anyone of you have an idea how you can display a collection, or better even, a specific dataset that's part of a collection in a workflow report?
    For displaying the collection, I know that there is history_dataset_collection_display, but where do I get an identifier for it?
    bgruening
    @bgruening:matrix.org
    [m]
    I don't know, but can you extract the file as part of the workflow?
    wm75 (Wolfgang Maier)
    @wm75:matrix.org
    [m]
    Yes, that's my workaround, right now.
    John Chilton
    @jmchilton
    I don’t think that is a work around - I think it is the right approach. If we’re going to pick apart collections - capturing it with that tool seems the right thing to do to me
    wm75 (Wolfgang Maier)
    @wm75:matrix.org
    [m]
    Conceptually, I agree with you. It's just that, practically, it forces you to generate a more complex history to get a nicer report.
    1 reply
    Björn Grüning
    @bgruening
    Agree concetually the correct thing, but it increases the complexity of the workflow and decreases UX (assuming the entire collection will be kept at the end). One of those cases ... :(
    wm75 (Wolfgang Maier)
    @wm75:matrix.org
    [m]
    Yeah, that's another good point. It seems the WF editor doesn't let you label non-starred datasets. But without a label you cannot access the dataset in a report.
    All this is still kind of acceptable, just making things a bit more complicated than necessary.
    Marius van den Beek
    @mvdbeek
    Yeah … we need to break up labels and starring. They are not the same
    Björn Grüning
    @bgruening
    I have the suspician that PDF export from reports yields to "sockets full" uwsgi messages.
    Worth an issue?
    Marius van den Beek
    @mvdbeek
    What makes you think that ?
    Björn Grüning
    @bgruening
    We have made PDF export work an hour ago and since then I see many full sockets and Galaxy is not responding ;)
    maybe just a coincidence, not sure, don't want to blame @wm75:matrix.org ;)
    wm75 (Wolfgang Maier)
    @wm75:matrix.org
    [m]
    always good to blame me ;)
    Marius van den Beek
    @mvdbeek
    and they go away if you revert ?
    wm75 (Wolfgang Maier)
    @wm75:matrix.org
    [m]
    I can at least close some open tabs
    Björn Grüning
    @bgruening
    (its only Wolfgang using them I assume ;))
    Marius van den Beek
    @mvdbeek
    does the report.pdf route show up in the slow response routes ?
    wm75 (Wolfgang Maier)
    @wm75:matrix.org
    [m]
    socket queue seems ok right now. Shoudl I try to get a pdf?
    Björn Grüning
    @bgruening
    go for it ;)