involved_inshould be allowed. But http://geneontology.org/docs/go-annotations/#annotation-qualifiers says only
colocalizes_withare allowed. I'm making corrections in ontobio to catch the space issue, but I'm not sure how to proceed given the new information here
@dustine32 @vanaukenk I'm looking at the gpad 2.0 spec. For with/from:
Pipe-separated entries represent independent evidence; comma-separated entries represent grouped evidence, e.g. two of three genes in a triply mutant organism
We currently only model with/from as a list. Could/should the pipes be treated as different annotations? Like if I had withfrom
a|b, this would be the same as 1:
b? Do we need to update how this is modeled internally?
part_of(GO:0071474),has_input(UniProtKB:P32485)In GPAD, would that be
BFO:0000050(GO:0071474)|RO:0002233(UniProtKB:P32485)? Also, I think has_input is OK even though it’s not on the specs? @vanaukenk @kltm
The Relation_ID may be from the Relations Ontology or from the set of GO relations, go_rel.