Where communities thrive


  • Join over 1.5M+ people
  • Join over 100K+ communities
  • Free without limits
  • Create your own community
People
Repo info
Activity
  • Jun 17 23:00
    tomkralidis commented #689
  • Jun 17 23:00

    tomkralidis on master

    add geometry representations fo… (compare)

  • Jun 17 21:40

    alpha-beta-soup on locales

    (compare)

  • Jun 17 21:38
    alpha-beta-soup commented #689
  • Jun 17 20:04
    webb-ben commented #685
  • Jun 17 19:56
    ksonda commented #689
  • Jun 17 19:53
    ksonda commented #689
  • Jun 17 18:42
    ksonda commented #685
  • Jun 17 18:18
    tomkralidis commented #470
  • Jun 17 17:14
    webb-ben commented #685
  • Jun 17 14:51

    francbartoli on master

    Docker locale tz (#711) * upda… (compare)

  • Jun 17 10:56
    tomkralidis commented #711
  • Jun 17 02:09
    tomkralidis commented #685
  • Jun 16 21:05
    webb-ben commented #685
  • Jun 16 21:03
    webb-ben commented #685
  • Jun 16 21:03
    webb-ben commented #685
  • Jun 16 17:57
    ksonda commented #685
  • Jun 16 15:00
    tomkralidis commented #685
  • Jun 16 14:33
    webb-ben labeled #715
  • Jun 16 14:33
    webb-ben opened #715
Francesco Bartoli
@francbartoli
or they are meant to be shared for each pygeoapi block?
paul van genuchten
@pvgenuchten
i added those slides francesco, just to have some content, please update to your liking, openlayers is a nice-to-mention but probably too early to actually use?
but i guess we can also use it as a xyz tile source
Francesco Bartoli
@francbartoli
Yes I’m not going to use it but I can mention
paul van genuchten
@pvgenuchten
are you using leaflet instead?
Francesco Bartoli
@francbartoli
the pygeoapi template is using leaflet yes
with a plugin
Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis
slides 1-6 are core for all pygeoapi exercises I think
Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis
@pvgenuchten @francbartoli putting finishing touches on presentation and then sending out (in an hour)
paul van genuchten
@pvgenuchten
+1
Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis
@francbartoli / @pvgenuchten checking in, are we good for today ?
paul van genuchten
@pvgenuchten
i noticed some comments that you want to use mostly gitter (this one?) for questions, or are we presenting the slides along side?
Francesco Bartoli
@francbartoli
all good on my side @tomkralidis
Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis
@pvgenuchten not following?
paul van genuchten
@pvgenuchten
what do you mean tom, who/what is not clear?
i'm in the gotomeeting
Francesco Bartoli
@francbartoli
where is the link @pvgenuchten?
Alex Kmoch
@allixender
The GotoMeeting session is not linked in the program schedule :cry:
Francesco Bartoli
@francbartoli
I found that but it is saying that the id is not valid for me
No sorry what I found is an old id for a sprint
Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis

@pvgenuchten

i noticed some comments that you want to use mostly gitter (this one?) for questions, or are we presenting the slides along side?

We’re using the slides during the presentation. I mention Gitter if people have technical issues, does that work/make sense?

paul van genuchten
@pvgenuchten
Sure, nice!
Francesco Bartoli
@francbartoli

@pvgenuchten

i noticed some comments that you want to use mostly gitter (this one?) for questions, or are we presenting the slides along side?

We’re using the slides during the presentation. I mention Gitter if people have technical issues, does that work/make sense?

+1

paul van genuchten
@pvgenuchten
but i guess we also monitor the github discussions
Alex Kmoch
@allixender
Francesco Bartoli
@francbartoli
Thx @allixender!
Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis
yes, makes sense @pvgenuchten
Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis
@francbartoli given your OATiles session is the first of all 3 pygoeapi sessions, can you talk a bit (4-5 min) to slides 2-7 and that they form the basis for all pygeoapi sessions?
Francesco Bartoli
@francbartoli
Sure, it was on my plan @tomkralidis
Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis
+1
thanks
Francesco Bartoli
@francbartoli
GitHub discussions look good, do we want to open up that feature for the pygeoapi repo?
Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis

GitHub discussions look good, do we want to open up that feature for the pygeoapi repo?

Good idea @pvgenuchten . Should we open a discussion to discuss how we handle these discussions :)

Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis

jokes aside, GitHub Discussions now enabled: https://github.com/geopython/pygeoapi/discussions

I kicked things off in https://github.com/geopython/pygeoapi/discussions/665

@pvgenuchten @francbartoli @kalxas @justb4 @jorgejesus and others, please help kick things off with your intros when you have a chance.

I will tweet and send to the mailing list.

jmckenna
@freenode_jmckenna:matrix.org
[m]
request for pygeoapi PSC: please add into your release process, actually creating a 'release' on Github so that all 'followers' are magically notified. eg. go here and look at bottom-right panel, empty releases section: https://github.com/geopython/pygeoapi versus go here and look at lower-right 'releases' section: https://github.com/MapServer/MapServer That automated notice of the release sent by Gihub, is now as important as the old email
notices to the mailing list. thanks!
Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis
good idea jmckenna. Trying this out
jmckenna
@freenode_jmckenna:matrix.org
[m]
thanks
@tomkralidis: very nice, received! VIP
Tom Kralidis
@tomkralidis
thank you jmckenna for the suggestions and continuous improvement. VIP
Note I've added this step to our release management page: https://github.com/geopython/pygeoapi/wiki/ReleaseManagement#step-9
jmckenna
@freenode_jmckenna:matrix.org
[m]
perfect, great document. thanks!
Sander Schaminee
@GeoSander
Hi @tomkralidis. I guess you were too busy last week with the presentations and so on, but this is just a friendly reminder to have a look at PR #664 :)